wowow

[[email protected]]

http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.

[George]

> wrote in message
...
> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
>

It's not going to happen. We went through a civil war and they didn't postpone
the elections. In fact, the Republicans have already dsiputed it, themselves.
Pardon me for saying so, but Rense is a leftist rag that jumps on every news
article like that one to durther their agenda. So, I don't buy it. IMHO. (and
I am a democrat, not a republican).

[Newbie Bill]

I would appreciate it if you preceded such subject matter with "OT", so I
know not to waste my time. IMHO many have had enough of this type subject
matter in a ponds group. I really appreciate your ponds/fish advice.
Thanxx
Bill Brister - Austin, Texas
> wrote in message
...
> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
> http://puregold.aquaria.net/
> www.drsolo.com
> Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
> compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
> endorsements or recommendations I make.

[Benign Vanilla]

> wrote in message
...
> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
<snip>

I think this site is capatilizing on a story and propagating it improperly.
From what I understand, Al-Queda is planning an alleged attack in order to
disturb the election process, and Tom Ridge has suggested we should be
prepared for such an event, even if that means postponing the election if an
attack does occur.

I find it hard to believe they are seriously talking about postponing it
pre-emtively. Not even Dubya would be that crass.

BV.

[PlainBill]

BV,

Who says Dubya is the one in charge? GOTCHA!!!

Seriously, IMHO, this was a story that got all blown out of
proportion. It APPEARS Tom Ridge asked several important questions -
Is their any plan to postpone the election in the event of a terrorist
attack? And should Congress pass a law permitting that?

Sadly, at least some congressmen seemed to be agreeable (which brings
up images of what happened in Germany 70 some years ago). Judging
from more recent reports, current plans are more in the order of 'How
do we conduct the election in case of a terrorist attack?'. And THAT
kind of planning is always in order.

But from the other hand, the freedom to ask such questions AND to go
totally overboard when they are asked are an important protection of
the Constitution.

PlainBill

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:49 -0400, "Benign Vanilla"
> wrote:

>
> wrote in message
...
>> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
><snip>
>
>I think this site is capatilizing on a story and propagating it improperly.
>From what I understand, Al-Queda is planning an alleged attack in order to
>disturb the election process, and Tom Ridge has suggested we should be
>prepared for such an event, even if that means postponing the election if an
>attack does occur.
>
>I find it hard to believe they are seriously talking about postponing it
>pre-emtively. Not even Dubya would be that crass.
>
>BV.
>
>

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression, for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
-Thomas Paine

[Ka30P]

When the election stuff gets to be too
much you can go here ---->

http://jibjab.com/thisland.html

It's rather cute and clever.


kathy :-)
algae primer
http://hometown.aol.com/ka30p/myhomepage/garden.html

[George]

"PlainBill" > wrote in message
...
> BV,
>
> Who says Dubya is the one in charge? GOTCHA!!!
>
> Seriously, IMHO, this was a story that got all blown out of
> proportion. It APPEARS Tom Ridge asked several important questions -
> Is their any plan to postpone the election in the event of a terrorist
> attack? And should Congress pass a law permitting that?
>
> Sadly, at least some congressmen seemed to be agreeable (which brings
> up images of what happened in Germany 70 some years ago). Judging
> from more recent reports, current plans are more in the order of 'How
> do we conduct the election in case of a terrorist attack?'. And THAT
> kind of planning is always in order.
>
> But from the other hand, the freedom to ask such questions AND to go
> totally overboard when they are asked are an important protection of
> the Constitution.
>
> PlainBill

I see no reason to postpone the election, certainly not because of terrorism.
The presidential election has never been postponed, not even during the civil
war.

> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:49 -0400, "Benign Vanilla"
> > wrote:
>
>>
> wrote in message
...
>>> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
>><snip>
>>
>>I think this site is capatilizing on a story and propagating it improperly.
>>From what I understand, Al-Queda is planning an alleged attack in order to
>>disturb the election process, and Tom Ridge has suggested we should be
>>prepared for such an event, even if that means postponing the election if an
>>attack does occur.
>>
>>I find it hard to believe they are seriously talking about postponing it
>>pre-emtively. Not even Dubya would be that crass.
>>
>>BV.
>>
>>
>
> He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
> oppression, for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will
> reach to himself.
> -Thomas Paine

[PlainBill]

Thank you, George. And does Dick agree with you?

<G><G><G>

PlainBill

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:44:44 -0400, " George" >
wrote:

>
>"PlainBill" > wrote in message
...
>> BV,
>>
>> Who says Dubya is the one in charge? GOTCHA!!!
>>
>> Seriously, IMHO, this was a story that got all blown out of
>> proportion. It APPEARS Tom Ridge asked several important questions -
>> Is their any plan to postpone the election in the event of a terrorist
>> attack? And should Congress pass a law permitting that?
>>
>> Sadly, at least some congressmen seemed to be agreeable (which brings
>> up images of what happened in Germany 70 some years ago). Judging
>> from more recent reports, current plans are more in the order of 'How
>> do we conduct the election in case of a terrorist attack?'. And THAT
>> kind of planning is always in order.
>>
>> But from the other hand, the freedom to ask such questions AND to go
>> totally overboard when they are asked are an important protection of
>> the Constitution.
>>
>> PlainBill
>
>I see no reason to postpone the election, certainly not because of terrorism.
>The presidential election has never been postponed, not even during the civil
>war.
>
>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:49 -0400, "Benign Vanilla"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
> wrote in message
...
>>>> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>I think this site is capatilizing on a story and propagating it improperly.
>>>From what I understand, Al-Queda is planning an alleged attack in order to
>>>disturb the election process, and Tom Ridge has suggested we should be
>>>prepared for such an event, even if that means postponing the election if an
>>>attack does occur.
>>>
>>>I find it hard to believe they are seriously talking about postponing it
>>>pre-emtively. Not even Dubya would be that crass.
>>>
>>>BV.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
>> oppression, for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will
>> reach to himself.
>> -Thomas Paine
>

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression, for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
-Thomas Paine

[George]

"PlainBill" > wrote in message
...
> Thank you, George. And does Dick agree with you?
>
> <G><G><G>
>
> PlainBill

Cheney? Who cares?

> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:44:44 -0400, " George" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"PlainBill" > wrote in message
...
>>> BV,
>>>
>>> Who says Dubya is the one in charge? GOTCHA!!!
>>>
>>> Seriously, IMHO, this was a story that got all blown out of
>>> proportion. It APPEARS Tom Ridge asked several important questions -
>>> Is their any plan to postpone the election in the event of a terrorist
>>> attack? And should Congress pass a law permitting that?
>>>
>>> Sadly, at least some congressmen seemed to be agreeable (which brings
>>> up images of what happened in Germany 70 some years ago). Judging
>>> from more recent reports, current plans are more in the order of 'How
>>> do we conduct the election in case of a terrorist attack?'. And THAT
>>> kind of planning is always in order.
>>>
>>> But from the other hand, the freedom to ask such questions AND to go
>>> totally overboard when they are asked are an important protection of
>>> the Constitution.
>>>
>>> PlainBill
>>
>>I see no reason to postpone the election, certainly not because of terrorism.
>>The presidential election has never been postponed, not even during the civil
>>war.
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:49 -0400, "Benign Vanilla"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
> wrote in message
...
>>>>> http://www.rense.com/general54/postponed.htm
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>I think this site is capatilizing on a story and propagating it improperly.
>>>>From what I understand, Al-Queda is planning an alleged attack in order to
>>>>disturb the election process, and Tom Ridge has suggested we should be
>>>>prepared for such an event, even if that means postponing the election if an
>>>>attack does occur.
>>>>
>>>>I find it hard to believe they are seriously talking about postponing it
>>>>pre-emtively. Not even Dubya would be that crass.
>>>>
>>>>BV.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
>>> oppression, for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that
>>> will
>>> reach to himself.
>>> -Thomas Paine
>>
>
> He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
> oppression, for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will
> reach to himself.
> -Thomas Paine