Sulfur NO3 Reactors Continued.......

[CheezWiz]

Start here...

[CheezWiz]

For those interested:

http://mars.reefkeepers.net/USHomePage/USArticles/Soler/DenitratorSoufre.html
http://mars.reefkeepers.net/USHomePage/USArticles/SulphurDenitrator.htm

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/august2003/chem.htm
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/may2003/aquarium.htm (why did he
remove it?)

http://www.wetwebmedia.com/denitrification_erfaqs.htm

http://www.wetwebmedia.com/nitratesmar.htm (Note: natural seawater contains
about 2,700 ppm of Sulfate.)

Interesting N03 reduction discussion:
http://www.coralforum.com/ftopic1027.html&view=next




"CheezWiz" > wrote in message
...
> Start here...
>

[Wayne Sallee]

Yea right hide it in another thread :-)
hehe

There's still two post on the other thread that I sent, that still have not
gone through. Maybe the government is filtering it :-)

Wayne Sallee

[Wayne Sallee]

In the aritcle
http://mars.reefkeepers.net/USHomePage/USArticles/Soler/DenitratorSoufre.html

It says "At installation time, the rate of water going through must be very low
(set using a Mohr valve). The system starts up very rapidly (in 48 hours at 26
degrees centigrade and just measurements of nitrites concentration of the
output water must be made. They will give high results. The rate of water
flowing through the cartridge must then be increased until the nitrite
concentration falls to zero"

I say why not start up at full speed?

Wayne Sallee

[CheezWiz]

My stupid ISP has already started expiring the other one.
They dropped all Binaries groups and dropped retention to near zilch.... 8(

"Wayne Sallee" > wrote in message
...
> Yea right hide it in another thread :-)
> hehe
>
> There's still two post on the other thread that I sent, that still have
> not
> gone through. Maybe the government is filtering it :-)
>
> Wayne Sallee
>

[Wayne Sallee]

In article >, "CheezWiz" >
writes:

>My stupid ISP has already started expiring the other one.

That is rather quick, and I though aol was bad.

You still get the posts right? just not able to retrive the older post on the
thread?

You don't keep the threads that you are interested in, on your computer?
That's one thing that aol has done right, in the design of the personal filing
cabinet. That was designed back when Steve Case was CEO. After he left, aol has
been slowly going down hill. Earthlink looked like it might move to the top,
untill I realized that Sprint owns it. Sprint is going down hill, so there goes
that idea. It's interesting waching different companies merge, and go down
hill. Like Kmart and Searse has recently merged. What a joke that is.

That's why I now use as my default e-mail address. It
forwards my aol e-mail to my e-mail address here at home, and to my aol e-mail
address at the store. An then if I find some internet provider that looks
promising, I will also have it forward my e-mail to that address as well. It
used to be that you never had to worry about not getting your e-mail, but
that's not the case anymore. The internet is getting too cluttered with junk.

Wayne Sallee

[Wayne Sallee]

In article >, "CheezWiz" >
writes:

>Start here...
>

LOL

But now you'r going backwards sdrawkcab gniog r'uoy won tuB :-)


Wayne Sallee