PDA

View Full Version : CF Rated Wattage


Nikki Casali
January 19th 05, 06:22 PM
Would there be any harm in using a 36 watt compact fluorescent T5 tube
with a 55 watt electronic ballast? I presume the tube just pulls as much
current as needed. The reason for the higher wattage ballast is to allow
for the potential to "upgrade".

Nikki

Richard Blincoe
January 19th 05, 08:31 PM
The ballast is to limit the current flow to the amount needed by the lamp.

In the world of conventional ballasts I think it fairly important to use the
"correct" matching ballast for the lamp.

I think a lot of electronic ballast are actually rated for a wattage range
i.e. 30-60w?? but I am not certain on it...


"Nikki Casali" > wrote in message
...
> Would there be any harm in using a 36 watt compact fluorescent T5 tube
> with a 55 watt electronic ballast? I presume the tube just pulls as much
> current as needed. The reason for the higher wattage ballast is to allow
> for the potential to "upgrade".
>
> Nikki
>

Richard Sexton
January 20th 05, 01:33 AM
In article >,
Nikki Casali > wrote:
>Would there be any harm in using a 36 watt compact fluorescent T5 tube
>with a 55 watt electronic ballast? I presume the tube just pulls as much
>current as needed. The reason for the higher wattage ballast is to allow
>for the potential to "upgrade".

You'll never know until you try. 65 and 55 are interchangeable. 36 and 40
are interchangable. 36 to 55 is a bit of a stretch, but it might be ok. I've
got a T12 ballast here that works wi 2 40W tubes or 1 40W tube or 1 25W tube.

The only thing you can't do is mix tubes of different wattages. That doesn't work.

--
Need Mercedes parts ? - http://parts.mbz.org
http://www.mbz.org | Mercedes Mailing lists: http://lists.mbz.org
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | Killies, killi.net, Crypts, aquaria.net
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Old wris****ches http://watches.list.mbz.org

Nikki Casali
January 20th 05, 02:56 PM
Richard Sexton wrote:
> In article >,
> Nikki Casali > wrote:
>
>>Would there be any harm in using a 36 watt compact fluorescent T5 tube
>>with a 55 watt electronic ballast? I presume the tube just pulls as much
>>current as needed. The reason for the higher wattage ballast is to allow
>>for the potential to "upgrade".
>
>
> You'll never know until you try. 65 and 55 are interchangeable. 36 and 40
> are interchangable. 36 to 55 is a bit of a stretch, but it might be ok. I've
> got a T12 ballast here that works wi 2 40W tubes or 1 40W tube or 1 25W tube.
>
> The only thing you can't do is mix tubes of different wattages. That doesn't work.
>

It's a shame there aren't any dimmable CFL ballasts in existence
anywhere in the known universe. Maybe someone can hack one together from
a linear T5 dimmable ballast? I presume there is no electrical
difference between the two?

Nikki

Ian Stirling
June 20th 05, 02:51 AM
In rec.aquaria.tech Nikki Casali > wrote:
<snip>
> It's a shame there aren't any dimmable CFL ballasts in existence
> anywhere in the known universe. Maybe someone can hack one together from
> a linear T5 dimmable ballast? I presume there is no electrical
> difference between the two?

There are, actually.
Apparently noone makes a "in one" controller chip for 240V, only 110V.
I suppose you could buy dimmable 110V CFLs and use a transformer.