Re: Finally, a Manpanzee experiment!

[Elroy Willis]

wrote in alt.atheism

> I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
> darn..!!!

> Jason Spaceman wrote:
>> From the article:
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> In an attempt that Intelligent Design (ID) theorists' claim will
>> definitively disprove Darwin's theory, ID proponents will attempt to
>> mate humans and chimpanzees to "empirically test Darwin's theory" in
>> the words of one ID theorist. Under the controversial plan, female
>> volunteers will copulate with male chimpanzees. ID proponents predict
>> that none of the women will become impregnated, thus refuting
>> Darwinism.

>> "Evolutionary theory is nothing but a lie," said IDN founder William
>> Harris. "They've been saying man came from monkeys for years. Well,
>> we're about to disprove that. If a monkey can't successfully
>> impregnate a human woman, then we're not related to them."
>> -------------------------------------------------

>> Read it at http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/11/195116.php

"Project leaders laughed off the question of their plan being sinful
bestiality."

That should read "sinfully beastful," shouldn't it?

Anyway, after reading the above, I see that it's just a joke, but to
be honest, I'd actually like to see the experiment done, just to shut
up the creationists out there.

--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com

[Ken Shackleton]

Elroy Willis wrote:
> wrote in alt.atheism
>
> > I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
> > darn..!!!
>
> > Jason Spaceman wrote:
> >> From the article:
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> In an attempt that Intelligent Design (ID) theorists' claim will
> >> definitively disprove Darwin's theory, ID proponents will attempt
to
> >> mate humans and chimpanzees to "empirically test Darwin's theory"
in
> >> the words of one ID theorist. Under the controversial plan, female
> >> volunteers will copulate with male chimpanzees. ID proponents
predict
> >> that none of the women will become impregnated, thus refuting
> >> Darwinism.
>
> >> "Evolutionary theory is nothing but a lie," said IDN founder
William
> >> Harris. "They've been saying man came from monkeys for years.
Well,
> >> we're about to disprove that. If a monkey can't successfully
> >> impregnate a human woman, then we're not related to them."
> >> -------------------------------------------------
>
> >> Read it at http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/11/195116.php
>
> "Project leaders laughed off the question of their plan being sinful
> bestiality."

Gotta be a joke, I can think of any number of "sins" that the woman
would be guilty of:

Bestiality
Fornication
Adultery?

Should she not marry the chimp before having sex with him?

>
> That should read "sinfully beastful," shouldn't it?
>
> Anyway, after reading the above, I see that it's just a joke, but to
> be honest, I'd actually like to see the experiment done, just to shut
> up the creationists out there.
>
> --
> Elroy Willis
> www.elroysemporium.com

[[email protected]]

Once bonesmoking becomes constitutional;everything goes.

Ken Shackleton wrote:

>
> Gotta be a joke, I can think of any number of "sins" that the woman
> would be guilty of:
>
> Bestiality
> Fornication
> Adultery?
>
> Should she not marry the chimp before having sex with him?
>

[Ken Shackleton]

wrote:
> Once bonesmoking becomes constitutional;everything goes.

bonesmoking? new term on me....oh...I get it....head!

>
> Ken Shackleton wrote:
>
> >
> > Gotta be a joke, I can think of any number of "sins" that the woman
> > would be guilty of:
> >
> > Bestiality
> > Fornication
> > Adultery?
> >
> > Should she not marry the chimp before having sex with him?
> >

[Ken Shackleton]

Ken Shackleton wrote:
> wrote:
> > Once bonesmoking becomes constitutional;everything goes.
>
> bonesmoking? new term on me....oh...I get it....head!

Well....I don't really get it that much

>
> >
> > Ken Shackleton wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Gotta be a joke, I can think of any number of "sins" that the
woman
> > > would be guilty of:
> > >
> > > Bestiality
> > > Fornication
> > > Adultery?
> > >
> > > Should she not marry the chimp before having sex with him?
> > >

[Denis Loubet]

"Elroy Willis" > wrote in message
...
> wrote in alt.atheism
>
>> I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
>> darn..!!!
>
>> Jason Spaceman wrote:
>>> From the article:
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> In an attempt that Intelligent Design (ID) theorists' claim will
>>> definitively disprove Darwin's theory, ID proponents will attempt to
>>> mate humans and chimpanzees to "empirically test Darwin's theory" in
>>> the words of one ID theorist. Under the controversial plan, female
>>> volunteers will copulate with male chimpanzees. ID proponents predict
>>> that none of the women will become impregnated, thus refuting
>>> Darwinism.
>
>>> "Evolutionary theory is nothing but a lie," said IDN founder William
>>> Harris. "They've been saying man came from monkeys for years. Well,
>>> we're about to disprove that. If a monkey can't successfully
>>> impregnate a human woman, then we're not related to them."
>>> -------------------------------------------------
>
>>> Read it at http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/11/195116.php
>
> "Project leaders laughed off the question of their plan being sinful
> bestiality."
>
> That should read "sinfully beastful," shouldn't it?
>
> Anyway, after reading the above, I see that it's just a joke, but to
> be honest, I'd actually like to see the experiment done, just to shut
> up the creationists out there.

See it? Hell, sell tickets!

Ummm... How much for a second row seat?


--
Denis Loubet

http://www.io.com/~dloubet

[kathryn]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
> darn..!!!
>
>

"Dammit I want a monkey man!"

[Elroy Willis]

kathryn > wrote in alt.atheism

> > wrote in message

>> I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
>> darn..!!!

> "Dammit I want a monkey man!"

Get yourself a Ron Jeremy video. :)

--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com

[Robibnikoff]

"Elroy Willis" > wrote in message
...
> kathryn > wrote in alt.atheism
>
> > > wrote in message
>
> >> I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
> >> darn..!!!
>
> > "Dammit I want a monkey man!"
>
> Get yourself a Ron Jeremy video. :)

ROTFLMAO!!! Don't DO that! <wipes eyes> Oh my ;)
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist

[kathryn]

"Elroy Willis" > wrote in message
...
> kathryn > wrote in alt.atheism
>
>> > wrote in message
>
>>> I should have trade marked the name when I had the chance.. oh
>>> darn..!!!
>
>> "Dammit I want a monkey man!"
>
> Get yourself a Ron Jeremy video. :)
>
> --
> Elroy Willis
> www.elroysemporium.com
>

OOOh my innocent eyes!

[The Great Hairy One]

In article >,
says...

> OOOh my innocent eyes!

Innocent???

Liar. :P

--
The Great Hairy One,

BAAWA all night long
SMASHing it to the masses
====================================
CEO EAC Roleplaying Division

Roleplay. Just do it.

[Pithecanthropus Erectus]

Ken Shackleton wrote:

> Ken Shackleton wrote:
>
wrote:
>>
>>>Once bonesmoking becomes constitutional;everything goes.
>>
>>bonesmoking? new term on me....oh...I get it....head!
>
>
> Well....I don't really get it that much


Perhaps because you don't know enough fundamentalist women.



>
>
>>>Ken Shackleton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gotta be a joke, I can think of any number of "sins" that the
>
> woman
>
>>>>would be guilty of:
>>>>
>>>>Bestiality
>>>>Fornication
>>>>Adultery?
>>>>
>>>>Should she not marry the chimp before having sex with him?
>>>>
>
>


--
"The pope should lift the ban on condoms immediately in order to err on
the side of life."

Catholics for Free Choice