The other Donald
June 10th 05, 01:57 AM
"Anonymous" > wrote in message
news:84YWYOSX38512.8553356482@anonymous...
>
>
> Those who argue for abortion contend that the fetus is not a human
> entity because it cannot live by itself. If that is the case, what is
> to be said of adults whose survival depends on the use of an
> artificial kidney machine or the aid of a battery-powered heart
> pacemaker? Certainly those people cannot be said to be less than
> human entities just because they cannot exist independently of these
> aids.
Apples to oranges comparison, and one of the most prolific of the strawmen
arguments you people posit.
We know that you ****ers don't care about the woman, that is why you equate
her body with a machine: a mechanical device that is only on this planet to
serve as a baby manufacturer.
Regardless of the smarmy bull**** you morons puke out about "a life
developing inside her," the fetus is a parasite that is drawing its
existence not from a machine, but a human.
It's certainly easy to require it of others, when it doesn't have lifelong
consequences for you.
When you are required, by law, to donate a piece of your liver, a kidney, a
lung, or your entire body to keep another organism alive, then you may
actually be getting close to a decent analogy.
Until then, you are just ****ing in the wind.
You people have been told this countless times, but you choose to ignore it
and shove your heads further up your asses.
<Excretia deletia>
(rec.ponds removed from the spammer's initial list. Creationism left in to
**** of the ignorant mass of fundies.)
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
news:84YWYOSX38512.8553356482@anonymous...
>
>
> Those who argue for abortion contend that the fetus is not a human
> entity because it cannot live by itself. If that is the case, what is
> to be said of adults whose survival depends on the use of an
> artificial kidney machine or the aid of a battery-powered heart
> pacemaker? Certainly those people cannot be said to be less than
> human entities just because they cannot exist independently of these
> aids.
Apples to oranges comparison, and one of the most prolific of the strawmen
arguments you people posit.
We know that you ****ers don't care about the woman, that is why you equate
her body with a machine: a mechanical device that is only on this planet to
serve as a baby manufacturer.
Regardless of the smarmy bull**** you morons puke out about "a life
developing inside her," the fetus is a parasite that is drawing its
existence not from a machine, but a human.
It's certainly easy to require it of others, when it doesn't have lifelong
consequences for you.
When you are required, by law, to donate a piece of your liver, a kidney, a
lung, or your entire body to keep another organism alive, then you may
actually be getting close to a decent analogy.
Until then, you are just ****ing in the wind.
You people have been told this countless times, but you choose to ignore it
and shove your heads further up your asses.
<Excretia deletia>
(rec.ponds removed from the spammer's initial list. Creationism left in to
**** of the ignorant mass of fundies.)
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn