View Full Version : Re: Why Is the Pope Afraid of Harry Potter?
~ janj JJsPond.ca
July 22nd 05, 01:04 PM
Why should anyone care?
A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
stoney wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2005 19:49:29 -0700, "Budikka666" >
> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-13386909,00.html
>>reveals that Pope Being Dicked 16 (aka John Paul version 3.0) said, "It
>>is good that you enlighten people about Harry Potter, because these are
>>subtle seductions which act unnoticed...[These stories could] deeply
>>distort Christianity in the soul, before it can grow properly".
>>
>>Out of all the poeple they could have chosen, some of whom are quite
>>enlighted as to the needs of the poor and downtrodden, why was it that
>>the cardinals elected a moron for Pope?
>
>
> That was all that was in the pool to select.
>
>
Robibnikoff
July 22nd 05, 03:43 PM
"~ janj JJsPond.ca" > wrote in message
...
> Why should anyone care?
> A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
I'll be sure to tell my Catholic sis-in-laws that bought the Harry Potter
book last weekend that they're not "true theists".
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
Christopher A. Lee
July 22nd 05, 03:58 PM
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:43:18 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> wrote:
>
>"~ janj JJsPond.ca" > wrote in message
...
>> Why should anyone care?
>> A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
>
>I'll be sure to tell my Catholic sis-in-laws that bought the Harry Potter
>book last weekend that they're not "true theists".
Exactly. My nearest Barnes and Noble stores (Poughkeepsie and
Newburgh) were open into the small hours when the latest book came
out, and did record business. In an area where the demographics meant
the majority of customers were some kind of Christian.
Robibnikoff
July 22nd 05, 04:10 PM
"Christopher A. Lee" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:43:18 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"~ janj JJsPond.ca" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> Why should anyone care?
> >> A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
> >
> >I'll be sure to tell my Catholic sis-in-laws that bought the Harry Potter
> >book last weekend that they're not "true theists".
>
> Exactly. My nearest Barnes and Noble stores (Poughkeepsie and
> Newburgh)
<chuckle> I sometimes forget that you don't live that far from me :)
were open into the small hours when the latest book came
> out, and did record business. In an area where the demographics meant
> the majority of customers were some kind of Christian.
But, of course! All my friends and family are christian and all of them and
their children read the books. Whoopsie!
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> Exactly. My nearest Barnes and Noble stores (Poughkeepsie and
> Newburgh) were open into the small hours when the latest book came
GAH! Coffee spit onto screen -- you must live right near me! Ah, the
wonderful new Newburgh B&N... conveniently located near Michael's,
Cosimo's, Home Depot, Lowes... GOOD TIMES.
-ml
Eris
July 22nd 05, 07:40 PM
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:10:31 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> wrote:
>
>"Christopher A. Lee" > wrote in message
...
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:43:18 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"~ janj JJsPond.ca" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> Why should anyone care?
>> >> A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
>> >
>> >I'll be sure to tell my Catholic sis-in-laws that bought the Harry Potter
>> >book last weekend that they're not "true theists".
>>
>> Exactly. My nearest Barnes and Noble stores (Poughkeepsie and
>> Newburgh)
>
><chuckle> I sometimes forget that you don't live that far from me :)
>
>were open into the small hours when the latest book came
>> out, and did record business. In an area where the demographics meant
>> the majority of customers were some kind of Christian.
>
>But, of course! All my friends and family are christian and all of them and
>their children read the books. Whoopsie!
The woman who condems me to Hell every week, purchase HP for her two
daughters. This woman can not wait to look down from heaven and wave
to me in Hell.
Jerry Kurst
July 24th 05, 06:26 AM
"Eris" <> > The woman who condems me to Hell every week, purchase HP for her
two
> daughters. This woman can not wait to look down from heaven and wave
> to me in Hell.>>
That's because you are a foul-mouthed dyke, not for any other reason.
Jerry Kurst
July 24th 05, 06:31 AM
Jerry Kurst, >, whose name means "stupid; gets around in
****-soaked underwear; likes to call his penis his 'shlong'", trickled:
> Deranged dilly-boy pines for nasty bog-queen with loaded sex meat to
> enforce horrendous anal plugging. Mail me at
stoney
July 24th 05, 04:18 PM
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:40:17 -0400, Eris >
wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:10:31 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Christopher A. Lee" > wrote in message
...
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:43:18 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >"~ janj JJsPond.ca" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> >> Why should anyone care?
>>> >> A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
>>> >
>>> >I'll be sure to tell my Catholic sis-in-laws that bought the Harry Potter
>>> >book last weekend that they're not "true theists".
>>>
>>> Exactly. My nearest Barnes and Noble stores (Poughkeepsie and
>>> Newburgh)
>>
>><chuckle> I sometimes forget that you don't live that far from me :)
>>
>>were open into the small hours when the latest book came
>>> out, and did record business. In an area where the demographics meant
>>> the majority of customers were some kind of Christian.
>>
>>But, of course! All my friends and family are christian and all of them and
>>their children read the books. Whoopsie!
>The woman who condems me to Hell every week, purchase HP for her two
>daughters. This woman can not wait to look down from heaven and wave
>to me in Hell.
Ahhhh, Xtian LoveŽ.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
stoney wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:40:17 -0400, Eris >
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:10:31 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Christopher A. Lee" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:43:18 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >"~ janj JJsPond.ca" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>> >> Why should anyone care?
> >>> >> A true a theist would not allow his child to read Harry Potter anyway.
> >>> >
> >>> >I'll be sure to tell my Catholic sis-in-laws that bought the Harry Potter
> >>> >book last weekend that they're not "true theists".
> >>>
> >>> Exactly. My nearest Barnes and Noble stores (Poughkeepsie and
> >>> Newburgh)
> >>
> >><chuckle> I sometimes forget that you don't live that far from me :)
> >>
> >>were open into the small hours when the latest book came
> >>> out, and did record business. In an area where the demographics meant
> >>> the majority of customers were some kind of Christian.
> >>
> >>But, of course! All my friends and family are christian and all of them and
> >>their children read the books. Whoopsie!
>
> >The woman who condems me to Hell every week, purchase HP for her two
> >daughters. This woman can not wait to look down from heaven and wave
> >to me in Hell.
Below, is linked, an interesting article about Harry Potter, that
matches some of my own observations, actually -- never seen the movies,
or read the books though. I do note, there are an awful lot of fantasy
oriented shows on US television. Let's see, we've got, or had, Buffy
The Vampire Slayer, Monsters (or something like that), that witch show
-- one where they're always talking about demons, and avatars, and
stupid **** like that, and Smallville.
Though I'm not sure Smallville is quite of the same category, because
the power seems to be mostly concentrated in the single embodiment of
the Superman like character, and though there are occasionally others
with powers, it all seems more or less "reality" based in the sense of
the premise, however unlikely, that it is all the result of a meteorite
or some such. Though it does seem less "reality" based than the
Superman of yore, so perhaps it represent sort of a morphing, or
degneration of the Superman character, and theme, into allignment with
more modern, egalitarian power distribution concepts, or rather,
delusions. With the old Superman, you knew Superman was a hero,
something special, and most likely, and realistically, that meant, not
you.
With the other shows, the power seems to be distributed more
promiscuously, without any particular rhyme or reason about it. They
seem to be about self delusion -- delusion of being powerful,
especially with the women -- mentality of like, 'I'm gonna put a spell
on you..' Which seems to be pretty much in line with the supposed
classic feminine affinity toward passive aggressive mentality -- the
oppositional strategy of coversion, and treachery, rather than direct
affrontry (whereas, with men, the negative side of the continuum is
supposedly violence, agression).
As a kid, I grew up with The Wizard of Oz -- I was captivated by it,
much as I imagine Potter fans today. I know the Wizard message was
about self directedness, and so on, and I've heard contentions Potter's
the same thing. I don't know -- like I said, at least regarding all
these shows on TV, they seem to be pretty shallow with their elloborite
constellations, hierarchies of monsters, demons, angels, councels,
spell books, and so on -- I mean, pah-lease, give me a break. The
Wizard Of Oz was obviously different, at least in one respect -- the
wicked witch of the east was killed at the outset, and wicked witch of
the west -- the one with the flying monkeys -- melted when she was
doused with a bucket of water.
A main contention of the article below, is that it's all about
narcissism:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GG20Aa01.html
Bryan
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.