stoney
January 12th 06, 06:38 PM
On 11 Jan 2006 15:24:17 -0800, "Neil Kelsey" >
wrote in alt.atheism
>
>MarkA wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:20:28 -0500, Nightphoenix wrote:
>>
>> > No planet like earth has been found elsewhere in the universe.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> You are SO ****ING PATHETIC!
>>
>> Let's see....100,000,000,000 stars in our galaxy; 100,000,000,000
>> galaxies; our ability to directly observe planets orbiting other stars =
>> 0. Number of planets that we can directly observe = 9.
>>
>> Let's assume that 10% of stars have planets (wild guess, but probably
>> conservative), that gives 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars with
>> planets that we can't even see. That's not even counting the number of
>> planetary moons that may be hospitible for life.
>>
>> That is one **** of a lot of "rolls of the dice".
>>
>> Yea, Earth is REAL SPECIAL. Not much chance that any other planet
>> like it exists anywhere else, eh?
>>
>> Asshole.
>
>No kidding. These idiots are great. What, we've had space travel for
>forty years or so and have managed to make it to the moon, and these
>lunatics are screaming about why we haven't explored planets that so
>far are just very fuzzy images in the Hubble telescope? They have no
>understanding or appreciation for the astounding distance we've
>travelled as a species. I guess that's what religious schools will do
>for you.
They're also the ones that have been screaming about how NASA's been a
waste of money since it's inception.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
wrote in alt.atheism
>
>MarkA wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:20:28 -0500, Nightphoenix wrote:
>>
>> > No planet like earth has been found elsewhere in the universe.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> You are SO ****ING PATHETIC!
>>
>> Let's see....100,000,000,000 stars in our galaxy; 100,000,000,000
>> galaxies; our ability to directly observe planets orbiting other stars =
>> 0. Number of planets that we can directly observe = 9.
>>
>> Let's assume that 10% of stars have planets (wild guess, but probably
>> conservative), that gives 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars with
>> planets that we can't even see. That's not even counting the number of
>> planetary moons that may be hospitible for life.
>>
>> That is one **** of a lot of "rolls of the dice".
>>
>> Yea, Earth is REAL SPECIAL. Not much chance that any other planet
>> like it exists anywhere else, eh?
>>
>> Asshole.
>
>No kidding. These idiots are great. What, we've had space travel for
>forty years or so and have managed to make it to the moon, and these
>lunatics are screaming about why we haven't explored planets that so
>far are just very fuzzy images in the Hubble telescope? They have no
>understanding or appreciation for the astounding distance we've
>travelled as a species. I guess that's what religious schools will do
>for you.
They're also the ones that have been screaming about how NASA's been a
waste of money since it's inception.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.