Re: AråchñÕe¤ thread: natural selection strikes the phillipines

[~Roy~]

And what does this have to do with the subject of this group
Carol......I see your dead set on disrupting yet another forum. Was
what you did to rec.ponds not sufficieint to curb your propensity to
dissrupt and create problems?
--
\\\|///
( @ @ )
-----------oOOo(_)oOOo---------------


oooO
---------( )----Oooo----------------
\ ( ( )
\_) ) /
(_/
The original frugal ponder ! Koi-ahoi mates....

[NetMax]

uh... Roy, it looks to me like you're going after another Koi-lo forgery,
and however unintentional, responding by cross-posting is ultimately harmful
to _this_ group.
--
www.NetMax.tk

"~Roy~" > wrote in message
...
> And what does this have to do with the subject of this group
> Carol......I see your dead set on disrupting yet another forum. Was
> what you did to rec.ponds not sufficieint to curb your propensity to
> dissrupt and create problems?
> --
> \\\|///
> ( @ @ )
> -----------oOOo(_)oOOo---------------
>
>
> oooO
> ---------( )----Oooo----------------
> \ ( ( )
> \_) ) /
> (_/
> The original frugal ponder ! Koi-ahoi mates....

[[email protected]]

NetMax wrote:
> uh... Roy, it looks to me like you're going after another Koi-lo forgery,
> and however unintentional, responding by cross-posting is ultimately harmful
> to _this_ group.
> --
> www.NetMax.tk

You don't have a clue about Koi-lo do you?

Let me help you out:

Carolyn Adamo Gulley
3245 North Lamar Road Mount Juliet TN 37122-7806
Phone 615-459-9345

has been caught in various vicious lies!
Before plaguing ARJW with her nonsense, she use to plague the Health NG
do a google search on Yarrow / windsong / Carol for more details.

http://tinyurl.com/bl2r2
http://tinyurl.com/99azt
http://tinyurl.com/87ow4
http://tinyurl.com/d6t5m
http://tinyurl.com/aheek
http://tinyurl.com/ck97r
http://tinyurl.com/cm3dp
http://tinyurl.com/8bscg
http://tinyurl.com/7epdg
http://tinyurl.com/bya3z
When she is best by a man she accuse him of stalking

http://tinyurl.com/8wryt

She engages people in senseless debates about absolutely nothing.
Her intent on ARJW is to slander JW's

Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts about JW's
or sling mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost
every country in the world?

Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time and
bandwidth on discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated
information. This is how she manipulates clueless bystanders in
participating with her distributing false information elsewhere?

Facts about Carol:

*She can never present evidence.
*She never reveals the source of her info (because there is none). Her
common reply, is: "everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why
bring it up?
*She always hides her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles. A TOS offense
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addresses
;which her ISP allows her to do. Just ask them:



If your newsgroups has been victim of Carol's MCP and ECP that is off
topic you can report her. Her account is dpc6682112001.direcpc.com and
you may report her by calling 1-800-DirecPC, by emailing us at
, or by writing to:

DirecPC
Customer Care Center
11717 Exploration Lane
Germantown, MD 20876 USA

Her use of remailers can still be traced to her account.No American ISP
like to be
associated with Hate Speech no matter if Hate speech is protected
under the First. It affects their commercial interest.
Then you can contact your own ISP and have them add them to their
block List Direcpc.com

Why does Carol behave as she does?


Carolyn Adamo Gulley of Mt Juliet Tn. Is a life long underachiever.
She did not finish High school in NYC, and lived as a biker gangsters
in the 60's and 70's. She claims on her former website that she has 2
failed
marriages and blames God for her poor choices. It is alleged that she
lost custody of her only son due to substance abuse, (never been
proven however). Dumped in TN by her Second husband, Quote-quote, with
no place to go.


She also has failed attempts at being a JW. She could never attain
their moral standards as dictated in the scriptures, and thus been at
war with them ever since. This has made her a very mentally unstable
woman, her hatred is intense, and due to biker-substance abuse
lifestyle, she now needs aid of a pacemaker.

By reporting her to her ISP, she is made aware, that she is alone in
her insane crusade full of false hoods and forgeries., and that you
the reader does not support hate speech against any religion or person.



Carol as Many other former and disgruntled JW's family members will
INDICATE that JW's
and/or the WTBTS are wrong or at fault no matter the topic, the proof,
or the evidence. As with Carol and other anti-jw's already
"know" the reality, and do nothing but work backwards from said
private reality with respect to a given WTBTS/JW related matter,
presenting anything and everything even remotely closely apparently
confirming their a priori conviction as "proof" that they were "right
all along". A good
example is ant-jw's fetish for reposting "excerpts" of articles which
simply declare that one or more wrong/evil-doers "is"/"are" Jehovah's
Witnesses, with ZERO proof/evidence that said alleged wrong/evil-doers
actually make any attempt at all to live the alleged godly principles
allegedly embodied in the teaching(s) of the WTBTS.

One may as well post an excerpt of an article that says, "four
teenagers girls - who are *WHITE* - were caught stealing Eminem CD's
from Tower Records", in hopes of convincing the audience that said
excerpt "proves" something about "whiteness". What does the "Jehovah's
Witness" label mean, if there's no proof/evidence that those it's
applied to in one of
these "excerpts" is anything more than a JW in name/label only? Do we
look at someone that tries to run 26 miles right off the bat,
with no training, and keels over, and say, "See? Now we KNOW that
runners are screwed up!" No, we don't. Or shouldn't. But that's
the kind of currency that the Carol's and PB's of the newsgroup deal
in.


replying to them is a virtual waste of bandwidth, and thee value of
their post should be considered in the same light as the National Globe
and
other tabloids..

notice what other NON-JW's have written about Carol:


"SD" > said about Carol

Carol,
When someone challenges you to justify your controversial claims they
are not being lazy, they are calling your BS. You seem to respond
with nothing but weasel tactics. I know this won't exactly break your
heart, but I have no choice but
to regard all the comments you've made about the WTS as unfounded
wishful thinking. Acting the way you do, probably helps the
organization more than hurts it. I can only think of two reasons for
one to constantly change their name as you do. Neither one paints you
in a particularly good light.

Maybe you should take a ride on that Yamaha of yours and clear your
head. She's here to subject her ranting to as many people as she can.
She's not here for honest discussion or debate. She just wants to make
noise, and lots of it

[Mean_Chlorine]

Thusly "NetMax" > Spake Unto All:

>uh... Roy, it looks to me like you're going after another Koi-lo forgery,
>and however unintentional, responding by cross-posting is ultimately harmful
>to _this_ group.

NetMax, if this is really you and not a forgery, I'd suggest staying
out of this mess. I don't know if there's a single actual functioning
human involved in this continuing saga of cyberstalking and mental
illness, but so much is clear as that the 'roy' persona you're
replying to is one of the stalkers/trolls/sockpuppets.

[NetMax]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> NetMax wrote:
>> uh... Roy, it looks to me like you're going after another Koi-lo forgery,
>> and however unintentional, responding by cross-posting is ultimately
>> harmful
>> to _this_ group.
>> --
>> www.NetMax.tk
>
> You don't have a clue about Koi-lo do you?
>
> Let me help you out:


Xabriol, you would help by telling me what any of that has to do with
someone (anyone) posting on-topic in r.a.f.m.

What we're interested in (if I can speak for more than just myself), is the
quality of the aquaria-related information, a poster's ability to give and
receive advice and that there's some respect for the opinion of others, when
we're not in agreement. I might add that this group doesn't do too badly in
these regards (imo).
--
www.NetMax.tk

[NetMax]

"Mean_Chlorine" > wrote in message
...
> Thusly "NetMax" > Spake Unto All:
>
>>uh... Roy, it looks to me like you're going after another Koi-lo forgery,
>>and however unintentional, responding by cross-posting is ultimately
>>harmful
>>to _this_ group.
>
> NetMax, if this is really you and not a forgery, I'd suggest staying
> out of this mess. I don't know if there's a single actual functioning
> human involved in this continuing saga of cyberstalking and mental
> illness, but so much is clear as that the 'roy' persona you're
> replying to is one of the stalkers/trolls/sockpuppets.


It hopefully does not hurt (too much) to ask what their issues are, while
it's in rafm and not cross-posted.
--
www.NetMax.tk

[Marco Schwarz]

Hi..

> What we're interested in (if I can speak for more than
> just myself), is the quality of the aquaria-related
> information

[x] you can..

--
cu
Marco

[~Roy~]

And just what is your dam point there chlorine dude? Or are you yet
one of CArols aka koi lo's sock puppets? You seem to have a lot in
common with that USENET Ho, anyhow, as you like to tell folks all
kinds of crap like they are not capable of making their own descisons
or interpreting who is who.............now go take a hike and its none
of your concern who replies to who now is it? In other words mind
your own F&^*ing business!

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:37:21 +0100, Mean_Chlorine
> wrote:
>><>Thusly "NetMax" > Spake Unto All:
>><>
>><>>uh... Roy, it looks to me like you're going after another Koi-lo forgery,
>><>>and however unintentional, responding by cross-posting is ultimately harmful
>><>>to _this_ group.
>><>
>><>NetMax, if this is really you and not a forgery, I'd suggest staying
>><>out of this mess. I don't know if there's a single actual functioning
>><>human involved in this continuing saga of cyberstalking and mental
>><>illness, but so much is clear as that the 'roy' persona you're
>><>replying to is one of the stalkers/trolls/sockpuppets.
>><>

--
\\\|///
( @ @ )
-----------oOOo(_)oOOo---------------


oooO
---------( )----Oooo----------------
\ ( ( )
\_) ) /
(_/
The original frugal ponder ! Koi-ahoi mates....