CanadianCowboyİ
April 5th 06, 04:37 PM
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
> On the other hand there is not a shred of empirical evidence supporting
> the existence of an eternal causeless God. Not a bit. It if pure
> abstract supposition with no corroberation.
Then explain your existence.
And once you have given me your answer explain the existence of what you
explained ...and so on and so on.
It has to start from somewhere and it is probably something that we
can't explain hence why you don't believe it.
> On the other hand there is not a shred of empirical evidence supporting
> the existence of an eternal causeless God. Not a bit. It if pure
> abstract supposition with no corroberation.
Then explain your existence.
And once you have given me your answer explain the existence of what you
explained ...and so on and so on.
It has to start from somewhere and it is probably something that we
can't explain hence why you don't believe it.