Koi-Lo
May 14th 06, 10:40 PM
"Charlië" > wrote in message
...
>
> "le ténébreux" > wrote in message
> ng.com...
> > "Precision" > wrote:
> >
> >> If you can show that Jesus would have admonished his apostles to
> >> limit the use of such technologies in favor of making personal visits
> >> and giving congregations more autonomy then by all means please share
> >> those scriptures.
> >
> > Well the often-asked question "What's with this archaic doorknocking?"
> > always seems to be answered with just the opposite. No we can't spread
> > the message to the public using the modern media instead, there's no
> > scripture that authorizes such a thing, we must do it this way because
> > that's how the early Christians did it, etc.
> >
> > That's the wonderful thing about issues that the scriptures are silent
> > about. It can be said to be either "not authorized" or "not prohibited"
> > depending on the desired conclusion.
> ============================
> I nominate this the post-of-the-week award! The GB/JWs have an answer for
> everything and it's always something self-serving and beneficial to the
WTS
> in some way.
>
> I have yet to see any proof from anyone that they were anointed or
appointed
> in any way back in 1918.
I have yet to see you post proof of ANYTHING! Where is the proof the
Clarksville
women were DF'ed?
>This was just dreamed up to make more people
> believe their rap and join their not-so-merry band of book peddlers.
Just like you dream up BS to post about JW's, with no proof atall.
> --
> Long John CH....
> How did we get here?
> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
> =================================
>
...
>
> "le ténébreux" > wrote in message
> ng.com...
> > "Precision" > wrote:
> >
> >> If you can show that Jesus would have admonished his apostles to
> >> limit the use of such technologies in favor of making personal visits
> >> and giving congregations more autonomy then by all means please share
> >> those scriptures.
> >
> > Well the often-asked question "What's with this archaic doorknocking?"
> > always seems to be answered with just the opposite. No we can't spread
> > the message to the public using the modern media instead, there's no
> > scripture that authorizes such a thing, we must do it this way because
> > that's how the early Christians did it, etc.
> >
> > That's the wonderful thing about issues that the scriptures are silent
> > about. It can be said to be either "not authorized" or "not prohibited"
> > depending on the desired conclusion.
> ============================
> I nominate this the post-of-the-week award! The GB/JWs have an answer for
> everything and it's always something self-serving and beneficial to the
WTS
> in some way.
>
> I have yet to see any proof from anyone that they were anointed or
appointed
> in any way back in 1918.
I have yet to see you post proof of ANYTHING! Where is the proof the
Clarksville
women were DF'ed?
>This was just dreamed up to make more people
> believe their rap and join their not-so-merry band of book peddlers.
Just like you dream up BS to post about JW's, with no proof atall.
> --
> Long John CH....
> How did we get here?
> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
> =================================
>