View Full Version : T-5 vs. Standard Fluorescent... also T-6
September 11th 06, 03:37 PM
I read the last thread concerning CF vs. fluorescent, and I did learn a
bit. I was wondering if anybody out there has any experience &
knowledge concerning T-5 units? I've seen these suckers in action and
they seem to be much brighter than standard fluorescent, with much
lower wattage and operating temperature. I was wondering what the
advantages & disadvantages are compared to standard fluorescent bulbs
(besides current cost obviously). I was also wondering if anyone has
any experience with those quantum T-6 bulbs that can operate in a
standard fluorescent fixture?
Richard Sexton
September 11th 06, 11:55 PM
In article . com>,
> wrote:
>I read the last thread concerning CF vs. fluorescent, and I did learn a
>bit. I was wondering if anybody out there has any experience &
>knowledge concerning T-5 units? I've seen these suckers in action and
CFL ARE T5 tubes. Just in weird shapes.
>they seem to be much brighter than standard fluorescent, with much
>lower wattage and operating temperature. I was wondering what the
>advantages & disadvantages are compared to standard fluorescent bulbs
>(besides current cost obviously). I was also wondering if anyone has
>any experience with those quantum T-6 bulbs that can operate in a
>standard fluorescent fixture?
Won't work. The electrical requirements are different.
--
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
September 14th 06, 06:55 AM
Richard Sexton wrote:
> In article . com>,
> > wrote:
....
> Won't work. The electrical requirements are different.
....
Wanna bet??? I have a T6s in a fluorescent fixture meant for T8s and
T12s. One of the selling points of the bulbs was that the advertiser
said that they would work in a standard T8 fluorescent fixture. This
is why I purchased them... I already know that they work, I just wanted
to know if anybody knows about their average useful life, technical
specs, etc.
I specifically wanted to know the advantages of T5s over these.
>
>
>
> --
> Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
> Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
> 1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
> 633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
Richard Sexton
September 14th 06, 10:43 PM
In article . com>,
> wrote:
>Richard Sexton wrote:
>> In article . com>,
>> > wrote:
>> Won't work. The electrical requirements are different.
>
>Wanna bet??? I have a T6s in a fluorescent fixture meant for T8s and
>T12s. One of the selling points of the bulbs was that the advertiser
>said that they would work in a standard T8 fluorescent fixture. This
>is why I purchased them... I already know that they work, I just wanted
>to know if anybody knows about their average useful life, technical
>specs, etc.
You're lucky and have a clever ballast. It certainly isn't true of
all ballasts.
>I specifically wanted to know the advantages of T5s over these.
The advantage of t5 over t6? Check the manufacturors specs for the
tubes but I doubt you'll find much of a difference.
--
Need Mercedes parts? http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.