Rec.ponds.moderated moderation policy - to ban or not

[Lo©ust-101]

"Tristan" > wrote in message
...
> Its amazing. It took those from Big 8 less than a month to see right
> through Carol as being an cancer on usenet, yet there are those in the

Oh such a hero..such obsession.... he terrorose old women! What a brave man,
takes candy from little babys to, eh Tristan?

> aquaria groups stil thinks she is a wholesome individual.........I
> bet the Big 8 tell those mods they need to put a muzzle on that bitch
> and put her under control with or without a charter or they are not
> going to make a new moderated group for those whiners. The unwritten
> word I hear is CArols days and posting ability is fixing to be
> severely crimped almost to the point of it being non existent. Way to
> go CArol....you worked hard at getting what you get in return.
>
>
> Oh just incase you missed it in the other posts.....bye bye carol, bye
> bye!
>
>
>
>
> On 10 Jan 2007 14:28:59 -0800, "Zëbulon" > wrote:
>
> <<>>
> <<>>Gill Passman wrote:
> <<>>> I've been lurking for a while and reading the ongoing discussions
> and it
> <<>>> appears to me one of the major hiccups is whether the moderatoration
> <<>>> team adopts a policy of banning offenders....so I thought it might
> be
> <<>>> appropriate to open a topic exclusively devoted to this.....my
> thoughts:_
> <<>>>
> <<>>>a nutshell, I think a banning or suspension policy would be a great
> <<>>> burden on a moderation team
> <<>>
> <<>>Simple. Exclude Carol from posting.
> <<>>
> <<>>The Big-8 has iidentified her as the root cause of Rec.ponds demise.
>
>
>
> -------
> I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!