Atlanta Jack
January 16th 07, 03:59 AM
Obsession with granny Carol duly noted Roy "Tristan" Hauer. Shes not leaving
and neither am I so deal with it.
"Tristan" > wrote in message
...
> So in the case in rec.poinds.moderated its easier to post erroneoous
> crap thana go head to head in a discussion which evidently is not
> allowed since your butting heads with another so it in fact is just
> passing on pityfully wrong info, especially when it comes from CArol
> herself.......
>
> yet another perfect example of dictatorship and being controlled by a
> moderated group intent on being the ultimate authority on may post
> made no matter what the content is.
>
> So will it be a requirement to say Seig Heil Seig Heil Seig Heil?
>
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:02:39 -0500, Galen Hekhuis
> > wrote:
>
> <<>>PondMeister wrote:
> <<>>
> <<>>> Carol is setting the stage. She want to make sure that her
plagerized
> <<>>> and many time incorrect information can get posted, and not get
called
> <<>>> on it.
> <<>>>
> <<>>> By simply posting: "Carol your info is incorrect" will send her off
on
> <<>>> a frenzy and thus accusing of others at snipping or bad mouthing
her.
> <<>>
> <<>>Someone posting "Carol your info is incorrect" is really not too
helpful.
> <<>>It does nothing to further discussion and gives no information as to
why
> <<>>the information was incorrect. If that is all it contains, I'm pretty
> <<>>certain the post would be returned. If it went on to detail the
reasons
> <<>>the information was incorrect, that would go a long way to
legitimizing the
> <<>>post, but I would still be struck by the words "Carol your info is
> <<>>incorrect." Much better would to say something like: "The above info
is
> <<>>incorrect" and avoid naming names. If such a post were made
explaining why
> <<>>the information was incorrect, possibly even providing "correct"
> <<>>information I have little doubt that it would be approved.
> <<>>
> <<>>> You guys as moderators have to really think about this. You are
setting
> <<>>> up a moderated group to basiclly moderate one person. Carol and her
> <<>>> sockpuppets. All of your discussion on moderation is how to moderate
> <<>>> Carol. All your energy and attention will be focused on
> <<>>>
> <<>>> ...Carol...
> <<>>>
> <<>>> And this is what she wants. Remember what the Rutherford Sheriff
dept
> <<>>> detectives mentioned.
> <<>>> She a 66 yr old Woman with the brain of an infant. She does no work,
> <<>>> sit behind her computer all day on the internet. Trust me, she has
the
> <<>>> time to make your moderation team waste theirs.
> <<>>
> <<>>I'm a 56 3/4 yr old man that some say doesn't even have a brain, let
alone
> <<>>that of an infant. I do no work (in that I'm retired on disability).
> <<>>There are those who must be convinced that I do nothing but sit behind
my
> <<>>computer all day on the Internet. Trust me, I have the time to waste,
and
> <<>>if there is one thing I am skilled at, it is wasting time.
> <<>>
> <<>>> You have already read what many of the Big-8 board memebrs and NGP
> <<>>> moderators said about her attitude. Even Jayne pulled away from her
> <<>>> support, because she can't keep her mouth shut. How many AFN list
> <<>>> members has counseled her on killfiles and filters, and she ignored
all
> <<>>> their advice?
> <<>>
> <<>>One thing about rpm, everybody will get to start with a "clean slate."
Past
> <<>>history, old flame wars, reputations and the like won't count at all.
> <<>>
> <<>>> Do you really want to waste your time? Do you guys want to talk
about
> <<>>> ponds; or how to deal with Carol?
> <<>>>
> <<>>> The answer is obvious.
>
>
>
> -------
> I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!
and neither am I so deal with it.
"Tristan" > wrote in message
...
> So in the case in rec.poinds.moderated its easier to post erroneoous
> crap thana go head to head in a discussion which evidently is not
> allowed since your butting heads with another so it in fact is just
> passing on pityfully wrong info, especially when it comes from CArol
> herself.......
>
> yet another perfect example of dictatorship and being controlled by a
> moderated group intent on being the ultimate authority on may post
> made no matter what the content is.
>
> So will it be a requirement to say Seig Heil Seig Heil Seig Heil?
>
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:02:39 -0500, Galen Hekhuis
> > wrote:
>
> <<>>PondMeister wrote:
> <<>>
> <<>>> Carol is setting the stage. She want to make sure that her
plagerized
> <<>>> and many time incorrect information can get posted, and not get
called
> <<>>> on it.
> <<>>>
> <<>>> By simply posting: "Carol your info is incorrect" will send her off
on
> <<>>> a frenzy and thus accusing of others at snipping or bad mouthing
her.
> <<>>
> <<>>Someone posting "Carol your info is incorrect" is really not too
helpful.
> <<>>It does nothing to further discussion and gives no information as to
why
> <<>>the information was incorrect. If that is all it contains, I'm pretty
> <<>>certain the post would be returned. If it went on to detail the
reasons
> <<>>the information was incorrect, that would go a long way to
legitimizing the
> <<>>post, but I would still be struck by the words "Carol your info is
> <<>>incorrect." Much better would to say something like: "The above info
is
> <<>>incorrect" and avoid naming names. If such a post were made
explaining why
> <<>>the information was incorrect, possibly even providing "correct"
> <<>>information I have little doubt that it would be approved.
> <<>>
> <<>>> You guys as moderators have to really think about this. You are
setting
> <<>>> up a moderated group to basiclly moderate one person. Carol and her
> <<>>> sockpuppets. All of your discussion on moderation is how to moderate
> <<>>> Carol. All your energy and attention will be focused on
> <<>>>
> <<>>> ...Carol...
> <<>>>
> <<>>> And this is what she wants. Remember what the Rutherford Sheriff
dept
> <<>>> detectives mentioned.
> <<>>> She a 66 yr old Woman with the brain of an infant. She does no work,
> <<>>> sit behind her computer all day on the internet. Trust me, she has
the
> <<>>> time to make your moderation team waste theirs.
> <<>>
> <<>>I'm a 56 3/4 yr old man that some say doesn't even have a brain, let
alone
> <<>>that of an infant. I do no work (in that I'm retired on disability).
> <<>>There are those who must be convinced that I do nothing but sit behind
my
> <<>>computer all day on the Internet. Trust me, I have the time to waste,
and
> <<>>if there is one thing I am skilled at, it is wasting time.
> <<>>
> <<>>> You have already read what many of the Big-8 board memebrs and NGP
> <<>>> moderators said about her attitude. Even Jayne pulled away from her
> <<>>> support, because she can't keep her mouth shut. How many AFN list
> <<>>> members has counseled her on killfiles and filters, and she ignored
all
> <<>>> their advice?
> <<>>
> <<>>One thing about rpm, everybody will get to start with a "clean slate."
Past
> <<>>history, old flame wars, reputations and the like won't count at all.
> <<>>
> <<>>> Do you really want to waste your time? Do you guys want to talk
about
> <<>>> ponds; or how to deal with Carol?
> <<>>>
> <<>>> The answer is obvious.
>
>
>
> -------
> I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!