Re: spring work ~ what do you need to do this year?

[~Roy~]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:44:30 CST, "Reel McKoi"
> wrote:


<<>>===================
<<>>We have to drain down both ponds to remove last summer's fry. They bred
<<>>into mid summer so the ponds are loaded with young fish. A few adults will
<<>>probably be culled out to make space as they all grow. The larger the koi
<<>>the less the ponds can hold. All look good, all look healthy and all are
<<>>eating. There are no signs of disease or health problems.
<<>>
<<>>Some water lilies need dividing which will be done soon, before they really
<<>>start to take off.
<<>>
<<>>That's about it for this spring.


I bet those young fry have an easier time of finding daddy than the
kids in the Gulley orYarrow or Witkowski family ever did! I bet
fathers day is a real hoot in Carol Gulleys household

Bit of past history on Carol from 1999....Her crap is nothing new
folks!
>On Wed, 27 Oct 1999 01:24:39 GMT, wrote:





>You miss the point, even though she's used well over four dozen aliases,
>actually (probably more). She changes them *because* she is a
>pathological liar - she posts so many untruths, contradictions,
>twistings of others' words and other deliberate obtusenesses
>habitually and continually. The changing of her alias is just another
>of her obfuscation techniques - more precisely, it's her way of making
>it more difficult for people to recall her words to prove her a liar
>from her own contradictory statements that would be easily seen in the
>deja.com record. Anyone who reads her posts for more than a few days
>clearly sees what she is.




-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!

[Reel McKoi]

"~Roy~" > wrote in message
...
> I bet those young fry have an easier time of finding daddy than the
> kids in the Gulley orYarrow or Witkowski family ever did! I bet
> fathers day is a real hoot in Carol Gulleys household
==============================

These are the kind of messages they want and welcome on the
FreshwaterAquarium Forum? This is the behavior they welcome there and see
as appropriate? How sad.........

Like one poster said "Show me your friends and I'll tell you what you are."
They can't be much better than you.
--
RM....
Frugal ponding since 1995.
rec.ponder since late 1996.
My Pond & Aquarium Pages:
http://tinyurl.com/9do58
Zone 6. USA
~~~~ }<((((*> ~~~ }<{{{{(ö>

[~Roy~]

Who the **** says its on the freshwater aquarium. You assume to much
you moron. There is certainly more than that one forum now isn't
there.........You kook..get aclue carol your dumber than dumb...You
know I do not even belong to TFA, but I know I could join and would be
welcome if I did.......More than can be said about you bitch!



On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:15:34 -0500, "Reel McKoi"
> wrote:

<<>>
<<>>"~Roy~" > wrote in message
...
<<>>> I bet those young fry have an easier time of finding daddy than the
<<>>> kids in the Gulley orYarrow or Witkowski family ever did! I bet
<<>>> fathers day is a real hoot in Carol Gulleys household
<<>>==============================
<<>>
<<>>These are the kind of messages they want and welcome on the
<<>>FreshwaterAquarium Forum? This is the behavior they welcome there and see
<<>>as appropriate? How sad.........
<<>>
<<>>Like one poster said "Show me your friends and I'll tell you what you are."
<<>>They can't be much better than you.



-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!

[Porsche Monkey For Life]

On the long hot summer day of Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:31:45 -0600, ~Roy~
dribbled:

> Who the **** says its on the freshwater aquarium. You assume to much you
> moron. There is certainly more than that one forum now isn't
> there.........You kook..get aclue carol your dumber than dumb...You know I
> do not even belong to TFA, but I know I could join and would be welcome if
> I did.......More than can be said about you bitch!

I think, if Carol quit her spamming, she'd be quite welcome in most
moderated groups. OTOH, if I had you in any group I moderated, you
wouldn't last long at all before you picked a fight and got thrown out.
Creeps like you never last.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21
The original "Henry Schmidt"
COOSN-029-06-71069

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: >

================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew

So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.

Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

Grading scale follows questions.

Have they ever :

1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.

2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.

3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*

4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".

5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.

6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.

7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.

8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.

9. Made a spelling flame. (*)

10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.

11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)

12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.

13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.

In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.

2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"

3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.

4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.

5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.

6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.

7. Defended a well known kook.

8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.

9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.

10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.

11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.

12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')

13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.

In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.

2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.

3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.

4. Mail-bombed anyone.

5. Spammed a newsgroup.

6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.

7. Lost an account due to abuse.

8. Won a kook award.

9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)

(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)

10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.

11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.

12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.

13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.

14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?

(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.

(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.

Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.

11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.

26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.

36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.

51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.

[DärFläken[_2_]]

Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:

> I think, if Carol quit her spamming, she'd be quite welcome in most
> moderated groups.

She is welcomed in moderated groups now. Look at rec.ponds.moderated
Now that she has her friends of rec.ponds back she has gone on a
rampage. Of course the board was warned about this. Now Carol flame war
that was contained to rec.ponds has spread to all the aquarium groups.

[Porsche Monkey For Life]

On the long hot summer day of Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:40:51 +0000, DärFläken
dribbled:
> Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:
>
>> I think, if Carol quit her spamming, she'd be quite welcome in most
>> moderated groups.
>
> She is welcomed in moderated groups now. Look at rec.ponds.moderated Now
> that she has her friends of rec.ponds back she has gone on a rampage. Of
> course the board was warned about this. Now Carol flame war that was
> contained to rec.ponds has spread to all the aquarium groups.

Takes two to tango, ****wit.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21
The original "Henry Schmidt"
COOSN-029-06-71069

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: >

================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew

So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.

Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

Grading scale follows questions.

Have they ever :

1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.

2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.

3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*

4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".

5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.

6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.

7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.

8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.

9. Made a spelling flame. (*)

10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.

11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)

12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.

13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.

In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.

2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"

3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.

4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.

5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.

6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.

7. Defended a well known kook.

8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.

9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.

10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.

11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.

12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')

13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.

In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.

2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.

3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.

4. Mail-bombed anyone.

5. Spammed a newsgroup.

6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.

7. Lost an account due to abuse.

8. Won a kook award.

9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)

(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)

10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.

11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.

12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.

13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.

14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?

(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.

(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.

Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.

11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.

26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.

36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.

51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.