~Roy~
March 21st 07, 10:25 PM
Charters and policy means nothing in a moderated group. They still do
what the hell they want to. rec.ponds.moderated is prime example of
letting a mod do as he sees fit in complete disregard for the charter
or policy in effect....
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:14:50 GMT, Wayne Brown >
wrote:
<<>>Aratzio > wrote:
<<>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:51:24 GMT, Wayne Brown >
<<>>> transparently proposed:
<<>>>
<<>>>>Aratzio > wrote:
<<>>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:31:56 GMT, Wayne Brown >
<<>>>>> transparently proposed:
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>>Aatu Koskensilta > wrote:
<<>>>>>>> On 2007-03-19, Aratzio wrote:
<<>>>>>>>> Which is not what you agreed to do when you signed up for the job.
<<>>>>>>>> Just like the bambi's and their self-appointment.
<<>>>>>>>> "We don't like the rules we agreed to abide by, so we will just ignore
<<>>>>>>>> them as we please and blame human error"
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>> Well, no.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>>> It is not silly, it is the job. If you do not wish to do the job that
<<>>>>>>>> you volunteered to do then you should resign and allow someone who is
<<>>>>>>>> willing to put forth the effort.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>> I do my job the best I can. In content based moderation there are always
<<>>>>>>> questions of interpretation, borderline cases, and so on, and all one can do
<<>>>>>>> is to use one's best judgment and good sense.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>>> BTW: I think you should put forth the idea that Sharon, Wayne, Bob and
<<>>>>>>>> I moderate ngp. That way EVERYONE gets to laugh.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>> That would be a hoot!
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>I can guarantee that I wouldn't approve any inappropriate articles.
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> So spam from the chairman would be out?
<<>>>>
<<>>>>Yes.
<<>>>
<<>>> Check.
<<>>>
<<>>> Forgery by the chairman?
<<>>>
<<>>> Marty's radio license?
<<>>>
<<>>> RFDs on removals until rmgroups are accepted?
<<>>>
<<>>> RFDs for moderated groups due to ongoing flame wars?
<<>>
<<>>All out.
-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!
what the hell they want to. rec.ponds.moderated is prime example of
letting a mod do as he sees fit in complete disregard for the charter
or policy in effect....
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:14:50 GMT, Wayne Brown >
wrote:
<<>>Aratzio > wrote:
<<>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:51:24 GMT, Wayne Brown >
<<>>> transparently proposed:
<<>>>
<<>>>>Aratzio > wrote:
<<>>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:31:56 GMT, Wayne Brown >
<<>>>>> transparently proposed:
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>>>Aatu Koskensilta > wrote:
<<>>>>>>> On 2007-03-19, Aratzio wrote:
<<>>>>>>>> Which is not what you agreed to do when you signed up for the job.
<<>>>>>>>> Just like the bambi's and their self-appointment.
<<>>>>>>>> "We don't like the rules we agreed to abide by, so we will just ignore
<<>>>>>>>> them as we please and blame human error"
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>> Well, no.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>>> It is not silly, it is the job. If you do not wish to do the job that
<<>>>>>>>> you volunteered to do then you should resign and allow someone who is
<<>>>>>>>> willing to put forth the effort.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>> I do my job the best I can. In content based moderation there are always
<<>>>>>>> questions of interpretation, borderline cases, and so on, and all one can do
<<>>>>>>> is to use one's best judgment and good sense.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>>> BTW: I think you should put forth the idea that Sharon, Wayne, Bob and
<<>>>>>>>> I moderate ngp. That way EVERYONE gets to laugh.
<<>>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>> That would be a hoot!
<<>>>>>>
<<>>>>>>I can guarantee that I wouldn't approve any inappropriate articles.
<<>>>>>
<<>>>>> So spam from the chairman would be out?
<<>>>>
<<>>>>Yes.
<<>>>
<<>>> Check.
<<>>>
<<>>> Forgery by the chairman?
<<>>>
<<>>> Marty's radio license?
<<>>>
<<>>> RFDs on removals until rmgroups are accepted?
<<>>>
<<>>> RFDs for moderated groups due to ongoing flame wars?
<<>>
<<>>All out.
-------
I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!