A. Paul. Ing
June 25th 07, 08:51 PM
Lies lies and more lies.......typical though from a moderator of
rpm.....they do not block they follow the charter....yea right and
folks in hell get ice cream and cold beer on a daily basis too. What
do you expect though for a group founded by a hipocrite of a preacher
man that has goals like Rev. Jim Jones did......
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:52:56 -0500, Galen Hekhuis
> wrote:
<<>>Early on, before we even got around to the first draft of the RFD, the
<<>>subject of "blacklisting" or blocking posters based on IP number, nym, or
<<>>any of a number of different criteria. The suggestion was met with a
<<>>resounding "NO." Even if someone were to hold hostage and threaten to kill
<<>>a cute kitten unless we "blacklisted" someone, we still wouldn't block a
<<>>poster. We aren't even looking at ways to do it, so we may not even be
<<>>able to do it even if we wanted to. If a post is civil and about ponds,
<<>>there is little doubt that it would be approved, no matter who submitted
<<>>it. Let me make it perfectly clear, we will allow anyone to post no matter
<<>>how many cute kittens someone threatens to kill. There are NO plans to
<<>>moderate RPM on anything other than content. Of course, if someone
<<>>threatens cute bunnies we may have to rethink that...
rpm.....they do not block they follow the charter....yea right and
folks in hell get ice cream and cold beer on a daily basis too. What
do you expect though for a group founded by a hipocrite of a preacher
man that has goals like Rev. Jim Jones did......
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:52:56 -0500, Galen Hekhuis
> wrote:
<<>>Early on, before we even got around to the first draft of the RFD, the
<<>>subject of "blacklisting" or blocking posters based on IP number, nym, or
<<>>any of a number of different criteria. The suggestion was met with a
<<>>resounding "NO." Even if someone were to hold hostage and threaten to kill
<<>>a cute kitten unless we "blacklisted" someone, we still wouldn't block a
<<>>poster. We aren't even looking at ways to do it, so we may not even be
<<>>able to do it even if we wanted to. If a post is civil and about ponds,
<<>>there is little doubt that it would be approved, no matter who submitted
<<>>it. Let me make it perfectly clear, we will allow anyone to post no matter
<<>>how many cute kittens someone threatens to kill. There are NO plans to
<<>>moderate RPM on anything other than content. Of course, if someone
<<>>threatens cute bunnies we may have to rethink that...