Re: Privacy Service Or Pedo Service?

[bobandcarole[_13_]]

On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +<NP-f36>+" > wrote:
> Anonymous Sender > wrote etacolo.com:
>
> > Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
> > and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
> > pieces of ass either
>
> How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
> on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?
>
> You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
> subject:
>
> Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
> Community Sample of Normal Men
> Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
> Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
> Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
> and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
> Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694
>
> http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html
>
> The results of this study of "normal men" found that:
>
> "Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
> exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
> arousal to adult stimuli."
>
> But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
> correspond with pedophilic behavior."
>
> The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
> it to their advantage.
>
> I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
> adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
> to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
> to the vunerable juveniles.
>
> So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
> adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
> should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.
>
> TomBa NP-f36

Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible.

[bobandcarole[_13_]]

On Jul 14, 1:31?pm, bobandcarole > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +<NP-f36>+" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Anonymous Sender > wrote etacolo.com:
>
> > > Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
> > > and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
> > > pieces of ass either
>
> > How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
> > on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?
>
> > You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
> > subject:
>
> > Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
> > Community Sample of Normal Men
> > Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
> > Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
> > Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
> > and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
> > Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694
>
> >http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html
>
> > The results of this study of "normal men" found that:
>
> > "Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
> > exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
> > arousal to adult stimuli."
>
> > But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
> > correspond with pedophilic behavior."
>
> > The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
> > it to their advantage.
>
> > I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
> > adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
> > to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
> > to the vunerable juveniles.
>
> > So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
> > adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
> > should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.
>
> > TomBa NP-f36
>
Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible

[4s00th]

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:29:55 -0700, bobandcarole
> wrote:

>On Jul 14, 1:31?pm, bobandcarole > wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +<NP-f36>+" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Anonymous Sender > wrote etacolo.com:
>>
>> > > Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
>> > > and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
>> > > pieces of ass either
>>
>> > How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
>> > on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?
>>
>> > You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
>> > subject:
>>
>> > Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
>> > Community Sample of Normal Men
>> > Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
>> > Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
>> > Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
>> > and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
>> > Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694
>>
>> >http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html
>>
>> > The results of this study of "normal men" found that:
>>
>> > "Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
>> > exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
>> > arousal to adult stimuli."
>>
>> > But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
>> > correspond with pedophilic behavior."
>>
>> > The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
>> > it to their advantage.
>>
>> > I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
>> > adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
>> > to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
>> > to the vunerable juveniles.
>>
>> > So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
>> > adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
>> > should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.
>>
>> > TomBa NP-f36
>>
> Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
> crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible
>
And yet, bo0by has never provided any scientific evidence of his
claims.

4s00th

[bobandcarole[_14_]]

On Jul 14, 2:43?pm, 4s00th > wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:29:55 -0700, bobandcarole
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >On Jul 14, 1:31?pm, bobandcarole > wrote:
> >> On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +<NP-f36>+" > wrote:
>
> >> > Anonymous Sender > wrote etacolo.com:
>
> >> > > Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
> >> > > and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
> >> > > pieces of ass either
>
> >> > How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
> >> > on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?
>
> >> > You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
> >> > subject:
>
> >> > Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
> >> > Community Sample of Normal Men
> >> > Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
> >> > Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
> >> > Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
> >> > and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
> >> > Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694
>
> >> >http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html
>
> >> > The results of this study of "normal men" found that:
>
> >> > "Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
> >> > exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
> >> > arousal to adult stimuli."
>
> >> > But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
> >> > correspond with pedophilic behavior."
>
> >> > The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
> >> > it to their advantage.
>
> >> > I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
> >> > adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
> >> > to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
> >> > to the vunerable juveniles.
>
> >> > So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
> >> > adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
> >> > should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.
>
> >> > TomBa NP-f36
>
> > Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
> > crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible
>
> And yet, bo0by has never provided any scientific evidence of his
> claims.


What are the consequences of sexual abuse? What are the effects of
child abuse? What are the symptoms of child molestation?
Answer:
Note that other traumatic events can cause the same symptoms as sexual
molestation. Thus, occurence of the symptoms listed below is not proof
of sexual molestation.

Depending on the seriousness, the duration and the sort of abuse, some
of those who were abused in their childhood, or recently retain
certain problems due to this trauma. These can be divided into
psychological, social, sexual and physical problems.

Psychological problems:

Fears, panic attacks, sleeping problems, nightmares, irritability,
outbursts of anger and sudden shock reactions when being touched.

Little confidence, and self-respect and respect for one's own body may
change.

Behavior that harms the body: addiction to alcohol and other
substances, excessive work or sports, depression, self-destruction and
prostitution.

Social problems:

Have little confidence in other people.

Fear of loss of control in relationships.

Sexual problem:

While making love problems often occur. The partner may be confused by
a certain remark, touch or behavior that brings back memories of the
abuse.

Patients sometimes don't want to make love at all anymore or make love
less.

Sexual relation problems may occur, together whit pain while making
love, not wanting to make love and problems in getting aroused.
Problems with the orgasm and coming also occur.

Physical complaints:

Abdominal pain, pain while making love, menstrual pain, intestinal
complaints, stomach ache, nausea, headache, back pain, painful
shoulders, in short all kinds of chronic pain may occur. The pain is
often inexplicable.

Eating disorders often occur in sexually abused people. More.

When the patients, in reaction to a harmful event, disordered for more
than a month in such a way that they can't go to school, can't work,
isolate themselves or experience other negative consequences, one can
talk about a posttraumatic stress syndrome More information . This
disorder originates in reaction to a very harmful event and has three
characteristic symptoms:

Denial and repression
alternating with re-experiencing,
and they are always over irritated.
Denial and repression ; they deny or repress the harmful event(s):
they don't want to talk about or avoid certain situations. At an older
age, memory of sexual abuse is often completely suppressed, but can
sometimes be recovered in psychotherapy.

It is, however, difficult to determine if such recovered memories are
memories of real experiences of memories of dreams or imagined events.
This difficulty can be a problem if you want to prosecute the abuser,
but it is not a problem for treatment using modern psychotherapeutic
methods.

Re-experiencing ; they experience the event(s) again; unintentionally
they are confronted with memories of the abuse, for example through
nightmares, sudden memories or unexplainable physical problems.

Over irritation ; they are easily affected, hot-tempered, jumpy,
excessively alert and don't fall asleep easily.



4s00th is a very sick ****.

"I cannot, in good conscience, claim that none of the posts contain
child pornography as I did not download the entire group, only a few
random samples -- all of which did NOT contain any pornographic
content or any illegal content. There was, indeed, nudity -- but we
all know that nudity does not equal pornography"--pedophile "4s00th"
admits he downloaded pictures of nude boys.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/b1706f807a0ffc6e?


Every decent person that reads it's vile confessions wants to vomit.
Not to mention rearrange "4s00th's" face :-) Anonymous pedophile
"4s00th" is a pathetic cripple that most likely lives alone, fondling
itself while dreaming about sodomizing innocent children. How utterly
humiliating for sick pedophile ******* "4s00th"


Only the sickest of deviants would even THINK about sodomizing young
boys and "4s00th" freely admits his perverted thoughts and even has
the gall to whine for acceptance because it confessed. "4s00th" is
evil
in its purest incarnation and definately not fit to be around
innocent
boys, or ANY decent person for that matter. "4s00th" belongs in a
cage.


"Yes, I've thought about giving little boys blow jobs, and the
fantasies have been very thrilling and exciting to me"--humiliated
pedophile 4s00th

"I am a pedophile -- someone who is sexually attracted to children; I
won't quibble about pre-adolescent or post-adolescent because I like
them all. That does not make me a threat to children"--humiliated
pedophile 4s00th



http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/d768e45a1077ee84?&hl=en

Oh, and he's modest too!!


"I have on occasion been known to humiliate myself -- but then, I'm
one of the few people with sufficient intelligence to humiliate me"
--humiliated pedophile 4s00th

..http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.boy-lovers/msg/
1139306e6ea99ff3?&hl=en


Would you allow anonymous pedophile "4s00th" to babysit your
children? After all, he says he's "not a threat to children"...

[David Simpson]

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:31:57 -0700, bobandcarole
> typed:

>On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +<NP-f36>+" > wrote:
>> Anonymous Sender > wrote etacolo.com:
>>
>> > Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
>> > and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
>> > pieces of ass either
>>
>> How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
>> on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?
>>
>> You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
>> subject:
>>
>> Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
>> Community Sample of Normal Men
>> Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
>> Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
>> Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
>> and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
>> Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694
>>
>> http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html
>>
>> The results of this study of "normal men" found that:
>>
>> "Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
>> exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
>> arousal to adult stimuli."
>>
>> But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
>> correspond with pedophilic behavior."
>>
>> The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
>> it to their advantage.
>>
>> I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
>> adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
>> to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
>> to the vunerable juveniles.
>>
>> So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
>> adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
>> should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.
>>
>> TomBa NP-f36
>
>Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
>crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible.

Perhaps you should read some of the references. Of course that would
involve you in thinking, not one of your strong suits, and would
confuse you with facts because your mind, such as it is, is already
set like concrete.
--
Regards
David
fundamentalism (n.): fund = give cash to; amentalism = brainlessness

[David Simpson]

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:30:57 GMT, Mike LaLonde
> typed:

>bobandcarole wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 2:43?pm, 4s00th > wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:29:55 -0700, bobandcarole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>>> On Jul 14, 1:31?pm, bobandcarole > wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 14, 12:36 pm, "TomBa +<NP-f36>+" > wrote:
>>>>>> Anonymous Sender > wrote etacolo.com:
>>>>>>> Normal adults aren't "turned on" by naked kids,
>>>>>>> and the world doesn't share your abnormal infatuation with prepubescent
>>>>>>> pieces of ass either
>>>>>> How many "normal adults" have you surveyed to determine what "turns them
>>>>>> on?" What definitions and criteria did your survey employ?
>>>>>> You might be interested in reading an actual scientific survey on this
>>>>>> subject:
>>>>>> Title: Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a
>>>>>> Community Sample of Normal Men
>>>>>> Author(s): Gordon C. Nagayama Hall, Richard Hirschman, and Lori L. Oliver
>>>>>> Affiliation: Kent State University, Ohio
>>>>>> Citation: Hall, G.C.N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L.L., "Sexual Arousal
>>>>>> and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal
>>>>>> Men," Behavior Therapy, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 681-694
>>>>>> http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html
>>>>>> The results of this study of "normal men" found that:
>>>>>> "Over 1/4 of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest or
>>>>>> exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded
>>>>>> arousal to adult stimuli."
>>>>>> But noted that "arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily
>>>>>> correspond with pedophilic behavior."
>>>>>> The advertisement and entertainment industries recognize this and employ
>>>>>> it to their advantage.
>>>>>> I lack citations, but numerous anthropolists have noted prevelance of
>>>>>> adult-juvenile sexual attraction across cultures and species. It serves
>>>>>> to increase the survival of the species when extra attention is provided
>>>>>> to the vunerable juveniles.
>>>>>> So, unless all of the above are wrong, your contention that "normal
>>>>>> adults aren't turned on by naked kids" seems to be mistaken. Perhaps you
>>>>>> should examine your definitions, and/or identify your source of guilt.
>>>>>> TomBa NP-f36
>>>> Anonymous pedophile "tomba" has been posting his pseudo scientific
>>>> crapola for years and still he defends the indefensible
>>> And yet, bo0by has never provided any scientific evidence of his
>>> claims.
>>
>>
>
>**CUT AND PASTE REMOVED***
>
>Why can't YOU explain the effects? Don't you know them without having
>to look at a website?

Bo0by explain! In his own words! ROFL. You're talking about an
impossibility. He doesn't have an original thought in his head ... Oh
.... Sorry, that's not a head it's a handicap.

--
Regards
David
fundamentalism (n.): fund = give cash to; amentalism = brainlessness