![]() |
|
wrote in message ... Dick wrote: Just a personal bias, I prefer more frequent changes and less percentage. I go twice a week at 20%. The bacteria that are established during the first "cycling" are what maintain the tank's health. I know I have read others that make large changes, I just am more comfortable to leave a larger percentage of "old" water and the bacteria in that water. Bacteria client the surfaces in your tank / filter. Water changes won't remove your beneficial bacteria. Agreed. My LFS guy (whom I trust) has told me that there is a very small percentage of bacteria in the water, but not enough to be significant. Changing a filter mat would be a much more significant change. Bill |
wrote in message ... Dick wrote: Just a personal bias, I prefer more frequent changes and less percentage. I go twice a week at 20%. The bacteria that are established during the first "cycling" are what maintain the tank's health. I know I have read others that make large changes, I just am more comfortable to leave a larger percentage of "old" water and the bacteria in that water. Bacteria client the surfaces in your tank / filter. Water changes won't remove your beneficial bacteria. I can vouch for this: two days ago I added a 1M length of clear pipe to the outlet of my main filter to do a small experiment with water movement. The experiment finished today and I removed the pipe - the pipe was slippery slimy - that was the bacteria in the water column - amazing really ;) Oz -- My Aquatic web Blog is at http://members.optusnet.com.au/ivan.smith |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FishKeepingBanter.com