FishKeepingBanter.com

FishKeepingBanter.com (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Reefs (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   New Tank (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=2594)

Dragon Slayer December 10th 03 04:13 PM

New Tank
 

"plaguebeast" wrote in message
.. .


are there any real, documented cases of this happening ?




eyeroll No, I took the shark out of the tank just before he nipped the
last of his fins off.


geesh
kc



plaguebeast December 11th 03 12:51 AM

New Tank
 

"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...

"plaguebeast" wrote in message
.. .


are there any real, documented cases of this happening ?




eyeroll No, I took the shark out of the tank just before he nipped the
last of his fins off.


geesh
kc



how many gallons do you need to keep a 20' shark ?



Dragon Slayer December 11th 03 05:22 AM

New Tank
 
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of the
shark and the damsel.

kc



Richard Reynolds December 11th 03 05:55 AM

New Tank
 
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of the
shark and the damsel.


now remeber to take into acount that the damsel will eat the shark once that occurs you
will only need about 30 gallons.


kc


:)
--
Richard Reynolds




Dragon Slayer December 11th 03 06:49 AM

New Tank
 
well the damsel is now confined to a compartment with way less then 30g but
has a nice flow through it to keep him plenty of 'fresh' water.

kc

"Richard Reynolds" wrote in message
news:1GTBb.64$kB6.14@fed1read05...
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of the
shark and the damsel.


now remeber to take into acount that the damsel will eat the shark once

that occurs you
will only need about 30 gallons.


kc


:)
--
Richard Reynolds






plaguebeast December 11th 03 04:01 PM

New Tank
 

"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of the
shark and the damsel.

kc



that is incredibly inhumane (insharkly maybe) he would have hardly enough
room to turn around.



Dragon Slayer December 11th 03 05:49 PM

New Tank
 
after the Damsel nipped most of his fin's off he was able to turn around
quite easily. guess it was a "Give/Take" relationship they developed.
eyeroll

kc

"plaguebeast" wrote in message
...

"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of the
shark and the damsel.

kc



that is incredibly inhumane (insharkly maybe) he would have hardly enough
room to turn around.





John B December 11th 03 07:45 PM

New Tank
 
lol
this whole thread is awesome, lol

John

"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...
after the Damsel nipped most of his fin's off he was able to turn around
quite easily. guess it was a "Give/Take" relationship they developed.
eyeroll

kc

"plaguebeast" wrote in message
...

"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of

the
shark and the damsel.

kc



that is incredibly inhumane (insharkly maybe) he would have hardly

enough
room to turn around.







plaguebeast December 11th 03 08:32 PM

New Tank
 
Seems like he would have just sunk to the bottom.


"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...
after the Damsel nipped most of his fin's off he was able to turn around
quite easily. guess it was a "Give/Take" relationship they developed.
eyeroll

kc

"plaguebeast" wrote in message
...

"Dragon Slayer" wrote in message
...
one thousand two hundred sixty three. less for the displacment of

the
shark and the damsel.

kc



that is incredibly inhumane (insharkly maybe) he would have hardly

enough
room to turn around.







Dragon Slayer December 12th 03 03:58 PM

New Tank
 
most likely would have if not for the 10x Tunze Stream 6100's pushing 3175
gph ea. to keep him afloat.

felling like a true troll now

kc




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FishKeepingBanter.com