"Pszemol" wrote in
:

"Jaime R-S" wrote in message
...
You ask too much. Methink you have to relax, I just read about
something that happened to a person here and commented on it because
is related to what I am working on. YOU WERE NEVER MY INTEREST, nor
will be, lol. Is that too hard for you to understand?

Its a pity you do not get what a discussion forum or newsgroup is...
Try to understand I wanted to open you eyes on the fact that your
statements were worthless. You do with this gift whatever you want :-)

First, you post with a pseudonym,

What pseudonym ?
This is my name... Is this a problem for you, son ?

second you want to know more than what you can handle...

Relax son, you can't handle much!

Don't you worry about how much I can handle...
The true problem is you have nothing to say :-)
And this is why your emotional response is here...


Pszemol, you're wasting your time on this troll.
Repeat after me: plonk

Good lord!
I commented on someone's experience and now I get insulted by two (if not
the same) different persons I don't even know. Neither of both I was
talking to.

Well my friend, now that you addressed me, lol, let me tell you that the
nitrites problem had been solved and my aquarium is running at 0.15mg/L of
NO2 WITHOUT WATER CHANGE for more than a month.

Other readings to be concerned are
NH3 = 0.3 mg/L
CaCO3 = 400 mg/L
NO3 = 20 mg/L
PH = 8.3
KH = 110

all at a 78 F/ 1.024 S.G.

I had a little setback on nitrites but I figured out how to solve it.

I already said this is a prototype and the size and other specs I keep to
myself.

But, I have to say that the aquarium had been checked by possible buyers and
I already have my investment paid.

Don't fool yourself, it is possible to have an inexpensive salt water
aquarium without the extraordinary cost of today's maintenance.

You guys are just ****ed because someone came up with an idea you CAN'T
UNDERSTAND. Next time you go to buy salr or sal****er, lol, think of me...

jrs

"Mark Cooper" wrote in message
.. .
"Pszemol" wrote in
:

"Jaime R-S" wrote in message
...
You ask too much. Methink you have to relax, I just read about
something that happened to a person here and commented on it because
is related to what I am working on. YOU WERE NEVER MY INTEREST, nor
will be, lol. Is that too hard for you to understand?

Its a pity you do not get what a discussion forum or newsgroup is...
Try to understand I wanted to open you eyes on the fact that your
statements were worthless. You do with this gift whatever you want :-)

First, you post with a pseudonym,

What pseudonym ?
This is my name... Is this a problem for you, son ?

second you want to know more than what you can handle...

Relax son, you can't handle much!

Don't you worry about how much I can handle...
The true problem is you have nothing to say :-)
And this is why your emotional response is here...


Pszemol, you're wasting your time on this troll.
Repeat after me: plonk

"Jaime R-S" wrote in message ...
Good lord!
I commented on someone's experience and now I get insulted by two (if not
the same) different persons I don't even know. Neither of both I was
talking to.

Remember: you are writing to the whole newsgroup.
Whole group of people reading you and have equal right to respond.
This is the whole idea of a newsgroup. If you were ment to send
a private message to a particular group member, send e-mail only
to him, not to the whole newsgroup or dont be surprised that
someone has a comment to your comment :-))

Well my friend, now that you addressed me, lol, let me tell you that the
nitrites problem had been solved and my aquarium is running at 0.15mg/L of
NO2 WITHOUT WATER CHANGE for more than a month.

WOW... Whole month without a water change ? That is impressive! LOL :-)))))
BTW - that is quite sad you still detect nitrites after a month...

Other readings to be concerned are
NH3 = 0.3 mg/L
CaCO3 = 400 mg/L
NO3 = 20 mg/L
PH = 8.3
KH = 110

all at a 78 F/ 1.024 S.G.

I had a little setback on nitrites but I figured out how to solve it.

Yeah... wait for the cycle to end ? :-)

I already said this is a prototype and the size and other specs I keep to
myself.

You said enough to make me laugh :-)

But, I have to say that the aquarium had been checked by possible
buyers and I already have my investment paid.

:-)))

Don't fool yourself, it is possible to have an inexpensive salt water
aquarium without the extraordinary cost of today's maintenance.

You guys are just ****ed because someone came up with an idea you CAN'T
UNDERSTAND. Next time you go to buy salr or sal****er, lol, think of me...

My friend, you do not understand the nitrogen cycle in a fish tank...
You never need to change water because of ammonia or nitrites :-)
These are neutralized with biological filtration, and there is something
seriously wrong with your tank if ammonia and nitrites are still
detectable after a month of cycling with live rock and sand...
BTW - one month without water change is NOTHING SPECIAL OR UNUSUAL.
It is even recomended that during fish tank cycling you do not change
water for a month or two, to not disturb the cycle... But cycling
with live rock is usually flat if you use live rock cured already...

How do you feel re-inventing the wheel ? :-)))

In a well setup tank the only reason to do a water change is to replace
trace elements, i usually go months without a water change
nitrate/nitrite/ammonia are 0...

Pszemol wrote:
"Jaime R-S" wrote in message
...

Good lord!
I commented on someone's experience and now I get insulted by two (if
not the same) different persons I don't even know. Neither of both I
was talking to.


Remember: you are writing to the whole newsgroup.
Whole group of people reading you and have equal right to respond.
This is the whole idea of a newsgroup. If you were ment to send
a private message to a particular group member, send e-mail only
to him, not to the whole newsgroup or dont be surprised that
someone has a comment to your comment :-))

Well my friend, now that you addressed me, lol, let me tell you that
the nitrites problem had been solved and my aquarium is running at
0.15mg/L of NO2 WITHOUT WATER CHANGE for more than a month.


WOW... Whole month without a water change ? That is impressive! LOL :-)))))
BTW - that is quite sad you still detect nitrites after a month...

Other readings to be concerned are
NH3 = 0.3 mg/L
CaCO3 = 400 mg/L
NO3 = 20 mg/L
PH = 8.3
KH = 110

all at a 78 F/ 1.024 S.G.

I had a little setback on nitrites but I figured out how to solve it.


Yeah... wait for the cycle to end ? :-)

I already said this is a prototype and the size and other specs I keep
to myself.


You said enough to make me laugh :-)

But, I have to say that the aquarium had been checked by possible
buyers and I already have my investment paid.


:-)))

Don't fool yourself, it is possible to have an inexpensive salt water
aquarium without the extraordinary cost of today's maintenance.

You guys are just ****ed because someone came up with an idea you
CAN'T UNDERSTAND. Next time you go to buy salr or sal****er, lol,
think of me...


My friend, you do not understand the nitrogen cycle in a fish tank...
You never need to change water because of ammonia or nitrites :-)
These are neutralized with biological filtration, and there is something
seriously wrong with your tank if ammonia and nitrites are still
detectable after a month of cycling with live rock and sand...
BTW - one month without water change is NOTHING SPECIAL OR UNUSUAL.
It is even recomended that during fish tank cycling you do not change
water for a month or two, to not disturb the cycle... But cycling
with live rock is usually flat if you use live rock cured already...

How do you feel re-inventing the wheel ? :-)))

"Chris" wrote in message ...
In a well setup tank the only reason to do a water change is to replace
trace elements, i usually go months without a water change
nitrate/nitrite/ammonia are 0...

And this is a norm, nothing unusuall.
Of course, all these are not actual 0, they are just
not detectable with aquarium grade color drop tests.

That is good to know
The only difference is that I am getting those numbers on an innexpensive
system.
The systems that I have seen that have the same diversity of fish, size and
light cost 3X more.
You see, is not that I am doing something new...
Is that my system is doing the same thing for much less!
BTW, is not just a month, the month started after the nitrogen cycle was
established.
Again, it is too much to tell but little motivation.
Is my system going to fail in a few more weeks?
probably!
I already have plans and counterplans to overcome every single setback
possible.

My first maintenance only cost me $20! and will only be necessary every
month.

Is there going to be water changes? I hope not but if it comes to it, I
already have an alternate plan.

You see, I am not starting now with this. I had been working in different
systems since my college years and after 10 years putting papers together, I
came out with something that was supposed to be for a wetland's sewage
treatment system.

Well, just keep asking and commenting but keep the insults to yourselves

Jaime
"Chris" wrote in message
...
In a well setup tank the only reason to do a water change is to replace
trace elements, i usually go months without a water change
nitrate/nitrite/ammonia are 0...

Pszemol wrote:
"Jaime R-S" wrote in message
...

Good lord!
I commented on someone's experience and now I get insulted by two (if
not the same) different persons I don't even know. Neither of both I
was talking to.


Remember: you are writing to the whole newsgroup.
Whole group of people reading you and have equal right to respond.
This is the whole idea of a newsgroup. If you were ment to send
a private message to a particular group member, send e-mail only
to him, not to the whole newsgroup or dont be surprised that
someone has a comment to your comment :-))

Well my friend, now that you addressed me, lol, let me tell you that the
nitrites problem had been solved and my aquarium is running at 0.15mg/L
of NO2 WITHOUT WATER CHANGE for more than a month.


WOW... Whole month without a water change ? That is impressive! LOL
:-)))))
BTW - that is quite sad you still detect nitrites after a month...

Other readings to be concerned are
NH3 = 0.3 mg/L
CaCO3 = 400 mg/L
NO3 = 20 mg/L
PH = 8.3
KH = 110

all at a 78 F/ 1.024 S.G.

I had a little setback on nitrites but I figured out how to solve it.


Yeah... wait for the cycle to end ? :-)

I already said this is a prototype and the size and other specs I keep
to myself.


You said enough to make me laugh :-)

But, I have to say that the aquarium had been checked by possible
buyers and I already have my investment paid.


:-)))

Don't fool yourself, it is possible to have an inexpensive salt water
aquarium without the extraordinary cost of today's maintenance.

You guys are just ****ed because someone came up with an idea you CAN'T
UNDERSTAND. Next time you go to buy salr or sal****er, lol, think of
me...


My friend, you do not understand the nitrogen cycle in a fish tank...
You never need to change water because of ammonia or nitrites :-)
These are neutralized with biological filtration, and there is something
seriously wrong with your tank if ammonia and nitrites are still
detectable after a month of cycling with live rock and sand...
BTW - one month without water change is NOTHING SPECIAL OR UNUSUAL.
It is even recomended that during fish tank cycling you do not change
water for a month or two, to not disturb the cycle... But cycling
with live rock is usually flat if you use live rock cured already...

How do you feel re-inventing the wheel ? :-)))

LOL this is just tooo funny :-)

Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets



Jaime R-S wrote:
That is good to know
The only difference is that I am getting those numbers on an innexpensive
system.
The systems that I have seen that have the same diversity of fish, size and
light cost 3X more.
You see, is not that I am doing something new...
Is that my system is doing the same thing for much less!
BTW, is not just a month, the month started after the nitrogen cycle was
established.
Again, it is too much to tell but little motivation.
Is my system going to fail in a few more weeks?
probably!
I already have plans and counterplans to overcome every single setback
possible.

My first maintenance only cost me $20! and will only be necessary every
month.

Is there going to be water changes? I hope not but if it comes to it, I
already have an alternate plan.

You see, I am not starting now with this. I had been working in different
systems since my college years and after 10 years putting papers together, I
came out with something that was supposed to be for a wetland's sewage
treatment system.

Well, just keep asking and commenting but keep the insults to yourselves

Jaime
"Chris" wrote in message
...

In a well setup tank the only reason to do a water change is to replace
trace elements, i usually go months without a water change
nitrate/nitrite/ammonia are 0...

Pszemol wrote:

"Jaime R-S" wrote in message
. ..


Good lord!
I commented on someone's experience and now I get insulted by two (if
not the same) different persons I don't even know. Neither of both I
was talking to.


Remember: you are writing to the whole newsgroup.
Whole group of people reading you and have equal right to respond.
This is the whole idea of a newsgroup. If you were ment to send
a private message to a particular group member, send e-mail only
to him, not to the whole newsgroup or dont be surprised that
someone has a comment to your comment :-))


Well my friend, now that you addressed me, lol, let me tell you that the
nitrites problem had been solved and my aquarium is running at 0.15mg/L
of NO2 WITHOUT WATER CHANGE for more than a month.


WOW... Whole month without a water change ? That is impressive! LOL
:-)))))
BTW - that is quite sad you still detect nitrites after a month...


Other readings to be concerned are
NH3 = 0.3 mg/L
CaCO3 = 400 mg/L
NO3 = 20 mg/L
PH = 8.3
KH = 110

all at a 78 F/ 1.024 S.G.

I had a little setback on nitrites but I figured out how to solve it.


Yeah... wait for the cycle to end ? :-)


I already said this is a prototype and the size and other specs I keep
to myself.


You said enough to make me laugh :-)


But, I have to say that the aquarium had been checked by possible
buyers and I already have my investment paid.


:-)))


Don't fool yourself, it is possible to have an inexpensive salt water
aquarium without the extraordinary cost of today's maintenance.

You guys are just ****ed because someone came up with an idea you CAN'T
UNDERSTAND. Next time you go to buy salr or sal****er, lol, think of
me...


My friend, you do not understand the nitrogen cycle in a fish tank...
You never need to change water because of ammonia or nitrites :-)
These are neutralized with biological filtration, and there is something
seriously wrong with your tank if ammonia and nitrites are still
detectable after a month of cycling with live rock and sand...
BTW - one month without water change is NOTHING SPECIAL OR UNUSUAL.
It is even recomended that during fish tank cycling you do not change
water for a month or two, to not disturb the cycle... But cycling
with live rock is usually flat if you use live rock cured already...

How do you feel re-inventing the wheel ? :-)))

"Wayne Sallee" wrote in message link.net...
LOL this is just tooo funny :-)

For the long time I was sure he must be joking...
Now, sadly, I discovered he was serious...