FishKeepingBanter.com

FishKeepingBanter.com (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/index.php)
-   General (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Advice Please (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=16651)

Pat December 6th 04 07:07 AM

Advice Please
 
Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby and need some advice.
I am undecided between a 2ft of 4ft tank. Is the smaller tank worth while?
I would like to have several fish to make it visually stimulating etc.
Advice PLEASE

Cheers

Pat



Jon Pike December 6th 04 09:31 AM

"Pat" wrote in
:

Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby and need some advice.
I am undecided between a 2ft of 4ft tank. Is the smaller tank worth
while? I would like to have several fish to make it visually
stimulating etc. Advice PLEASE


Depends on what kind of fish you want, how much money you want to spend,
how much effort you want to put in, etc...

--
http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet

Pat December 6th 04 10:37 AM

I have the prices on the tanks, heaters, filter etc. No Problem
No ideas on fish yet. That will be the next question.
I am worried that a 2ft would not be adequate to have a variety of fish etc.

Pat

"Jon Pike" wrote in message
. 159...
"Pat" wrote in
:

Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby and need some advice.
I am undecided between a 2ft of 4ft tank. Is the smaller tank worth
while? I would like to have several fish to make it visually
stimulating etc. Advice PLEASE


Depends on what kind of fish you want, how much money you want to spend,
how much effort you want to put in, etc...

--
http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet




[email protected] December 6th 04 12:04 PM

http://www.ardice.com/Regional/Ocean...es/A/Adelaide/


Margolis December 6th 04 02:53 PM

"Pat" wrote in message
...
I have the prices on the tanks, heaters, filter etc. No Problem
No ideas on fish yet. That will be the next question.
I am worried that a 2ft would not be adequate to have a variety of fish

etc.

Pat



bigger tank is always better. More stable and healthier for the fish. But
I hope you know what you are getting into. Tanks require a lot of regular
maintenance to keep them healthy and looking good. Are you going to be able
to do all the work required with a baby?

--

Margolis
http://web.archive.org/web/200302152...qs/AGQ2FAQ.htm
http://www.unrealtower.org/faq






Donegal Paul December 6th 04 06:28 PM


"Pat" said
Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby


Most people buy cots to be honest :-)
--
Donegal Paul - On the mend
Lambretta Li186 - crashed and bashed
Vespa T5 Millenium - intact
www.thepilgrimssc.co.uk
www.a4c.co.uk - What are YOU doing?



Pat December 6th 04 08:05 PM

Ha Ha.........
"Donegal Paul" wrote in message
...

"Pat" said
Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby


Most people buy cots to be honest :-)
--
Donegal Paul - On the mend
Lambretta Li186 - crashed and bashed
Vespa T5 Millenium - intact
www.thepilgrimssc.co.uk
www.a4c.co.uk - What are YOU doing?





Tom Randy December 7th 04 12:17 AM

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:07:30 +1100, Pat wrote:

Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby and need some advice.
I am undecided between a 2ft of 4ft tank. Is the smaller tank worth while?
I would like to have several fish to make it visually stimulating etc.
Advice PLEASE

Cheers

Pat



Please, get the baby a crib.


Go with the bigger tank. Make sure to cycle it properly BEFORE adding fish
or you'll have dead fish soon...

Do a google search of fishless cycling...



Dick December 7th 04 10:30 AM

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:07:30 +1100, "Pat"
wrote:

Hi,
I am looking at getting a fish tank for my baby and need some advice.
I am undecided between a 2ft of 4ft tank. Is the smaller tank worth while?
I would like to have several fish to make it visually stimulating etc.
Advice PLEASE

Cheers

Pat

I would buy a tank with at least 20 gallons, better even larger. I
have 3 tens, one 29 and one 75. The ten gallon tanks are much harder
to enjoy and take as much work. The larger tanks can hold larger fish
and more fish. Some of my favorites such as the Clown Loach, Siamese
Algae Eaters and Plecos, don't do well in small tanks. Also pay
attention to the lighting. The hoods that come with the tanks usually
limit you to "low light" plants. For more varieties get a tank hood
that provides more than 3 watts per gallon. I have nothing but low
light tanks. While the plant selection is limited, those that I have
are doing well and have spread to fill the tank.

You really don't want the tank for your baby do you? By all means get
the larger tank if you do. Strange!

dick



Mark Stone December 7th 04 01:03 PM

Pat wrote:
I have the prices on the tanks, heaters, filter etc. No Problem No ideas
on fish yet. That will be the next question. I am worried that a 2ft
would not be adequate to have a variety of fish etc.


All else being the same, I would go with the four foot -- as a rule of
thumb, the larger the aquarium (to a point), the easier the
maintenance! --Mark



--
Posted via CichlidFish.com
http://www.cichlidfish.com/portal/forums

Geezer From The Freezer December 9th 04 05:53 PM



Tom Randy wrote:

Please, get the baby a crib.

Go with the bigger tank. Make sure to cycle it properly BEFORE adding fish
or you'll have dead fish soon...

Do a google search of fishless cycling...



Not necessarily - just don't go stupid and put 5 fish in, in one go!!!
Ease the fish in and let the cycle catch up...nice mild cycle then.

Geezer From The Freezer December 9th 04 05:55 PM



Dick wrote:

I would buy a tank with at least 20 gallons, better even larger. I
have 3 tens, one 29 and one 75. The ten gallon tanks are much harder
to enjoy and take as much work. The larger tanks can hold larger fish
and more fish. Some of my favorites such as the Clown Loach, Siamese
Algae Eaters and Plecos, don't do well in small tanks. Also pay
attention to the lighting. The hoods that come with the tanks usually
limit you to "low light" plants. For more varieties get a tank hood
that provides more than 3 watts per gallon. I have nothing but low
light tanks. While the plant selection is limited, those that I have
are doing well and have spread to fill the tank.


I agree, bigger tanks are easier to maintain to be honest!
I have a 63 and a 15, the 63 is much easier to look after (Especially
as I have no gravel in it)

Dr Engelbert Buxbaum December 12th 04 01:39 PM

Mark Stone wrote:


All else being the same, I would go with the four foot -- as a rule of
thumb, the larger the aquarium (to a point), the easier the
maintenance! --Mark


I once helped with the maintainance of a commercial show-aquarium,
because at a depth of 8 m (20 ft or so) the owners relied on the local
scuba community to do the work for them. In exchange we had the
opportunity to dive in several million l of filtered, crystal-clear sea
water, brightly illuminated and with plenty of exotic species (including
a pack of 4 sand tiger sharks), with air provided at no cost.

So maintainance can be quite easy, even for LARGE tanks ;-)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FishKeepingBanter.com