FishKeepingBanter.com

FishKeepingBanter.com (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/index.php)
-   General (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   taking fish pictures (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=21238)

*muffin* June 29th 05 01:44 AM

taking fish pictures
 
ok, HOW do you take pictures of the fish in the pond without getting the sun
glare on the water??? also, even with a tripod the fish are very fuzzy,,
from moving around. (too much trouble to staple their 'feet' to the floor)



kathy June 29th 05 04:26 AM


Try cloudy days and fast film, I think there is
an 800 speed out there.
You can even buy disposable cameras with
fast film now.

kathy :-)
www.blogfromthebog.com
this week ~ Mosquitoes!
Run For Your Life!

Pond 101 page for new pond keepers ~
http://hometown.aol.com/ka30p/myhomepage/garden.html


Gary Woods June 29th 05 05:20 AM

"*muffin*" wrote:

ok, HOW do you take pictures of the fish in the pond without getting the sun
glare on the water???


Polarizing filter works wonders.

Manual focus if you can do it; automatic may well focus on the surface of
the water, especially if you haven't filtered out the glare.




Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G

*muffin* June 29th 05 07:24 AM

any way of doing this with a digital camera?


"Gary Woods" wrote in message
...
"*muffin*" wrote:

ok, HOW do you take pictures of the fish in the pond without getting the

sun
glare on the water???


Polarizing filter works wonders.

Manual focus if you can do it; automatic may well focus on the surface of
the water, especially if you haven't filtered out the glare.




Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at

home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G




Derek Broughton June 29th 05 04:17 PM

*muffin* wrote:

any way of doing this with a digital camera?


"Gary Woods" wrote:
"*muffin*" wrote:

ok, HOW do you take pictures of the fish in the pond without getting the

sun
glare on the water???


Polarizing filter works wonders.

Manual focus if you can do it; automatic may well focus on the surface of
the water, especially if you haven't filtered out the glare.


Please don't top-post...

You do it with a digital camera exactly the same way as with a film camera.
Cheap cameras of any kind have no way to attach a filter or manually focus.
--
derek

*muffin* June 29th 05 08:18 PM


"Derek Broughton" wrote in message
...
Please don't top-post...



lol.. you know I really 'hate' top posting.

but it seems like you run into lots of people who HATE bottom posting & will
even refuse to read bottom posted messages.


I realllllllllllllllllllllly hate the ones where it is a long message, they
quote the WHOLE dang thing & just add "me too"
aarghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


muffin don't think you can win either way!



Reel McKoi June 29th 05 08:28 PM


"*muffin*" wrote in message
...
any way of doing this with a digital camera?

================
I have a HP digital camera and there is no way to do it without the added
expense of add-on filters. Our camera was over $200 and isn't made for
add-ons or manually focusing. Be careful what you choose when you buy these
cameras. Prepare to spend a bundle for one that manually focuses and can
take add-ons.
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
EVERYONE: "Please check people's headers for forgeries
before flushing." NAMES ARE BEING FORGED.
My Pond Page http://tinyurl.com/cuq5b
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o


San Diego Joe June 29th 05 09:07 PM

"*muffin*" wrote:


"Derek Broughton" wrote in message
...
Please don't top-post...



lol.. you know I really 'hate' top posting.

but it seems like you run into lots of people who HATE bottom posting & will
even refuse to read bottom posted messages.


I realllllllllllllllllllllly hate the ones where it is a long message, they
quote the WHOLE dang thing & just add "me too"
aarghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


muffin don't think you can win either way!



All right! So the top/bottom post debate is now happening twice yearly. I
look forward to it. ;)


San Diego Joe
4,000 - 5,000 Gallons.
Koi, Goldfish, and RES named Colombo.



*muffin* June 29th 05 11:01 PM


"San Diego Joe" wrote in message
...
"*muffin*" wrote:
"Derek Broughton" wrote in message
...
Please don't top-post...


lol.. you know I really 'hate' top posting.

but it seems like you run into lots of people who HATE bottom posting &

will
even refuse to read bottom posted messages.


muffin don't think you can win either way!



All right! So the top/bottom post debate is now happening twice yearly. I
look forward to it. ;)


San Diego Joe


lol.. in EVERY newsgroup, message board, email group ( such as
yahoogroups).that I go to . they ALL have fights over top & bottom
posting......




Derek Broughton June 30th 05 02:22 PM

Reel McKoi wrote:

I have a HP digital camera and there is no way to do it without the added
expense of add-on filters.


My photographer friend was just dissing companies like HP that think they
can make cameras. It's true that most of the internals of a digital camera
are not much different from a computer, but the most important part of any
camera is the lens. Stick to cameras from _camera_ companies - like Canon,
Minolta, etc, and you'll have a better chance of (a) good pictures; and (b)
being able to put a filter on it. Back when I was into 35mm photography we
almost never shot without a UV filter - it rarely hurts a picture, and it
protects the camera lens.
--
derek

Derek Broughton June 30th 05 02:28 PM

San Diego Joe wrote:

"Derek Broughton" wrote in message
...
Please don't top-post...


All right! So the top/bottom post debate is now happening twice yearly. I
look forward to it. ;)


I had no plan to _debate_ it :-) (and I did say please!)

And always, top or bottom, _trim_!
--
derek

Reel Mckoi June 30th 05 06:00 PM


"Derek Broughton" wrote in message
...
Reel McKoi wrote:

I have a HP digital camera and there is no way to do it without the

added
expense of add-on filters.


My photographer friend was just dissing companies like HP that think they
can make cameras. It's true that most of the internals of a digital

camera
are not much different from a computer, but the most important part of any
camera is the lens. Stick to cameras from _camera_ companies - like

Canon,
Minolta, etc, and you'll have a better chance of (a) good pictures; and

(b)
being able to put a filter on it. Back when I was into 35mm photography we
almost never shot without a UV filter - it rarely hurts a picture, and it
protects the camera lens.

=====================
Thanks Derek. We didn't realize that when we bought this camera a few years
ago. With the kids grown and gone we don't take as many pictures, so don't
want to invest a lot of money in a new camera.
--
McKoi.... the frugal ponder...
EVERYONE: "Please check people's headers for forgeries
before flushing." NAMES ARE BEING FORGED.
My Pond Page http://tinyurl.com/cuq5b
~~~ }((((o ~~~ }{{{{o ~~~ }(((((o


matrix j July 1st 05 08:16 PM





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FishKeepingBanter.com