FishKeepingBanter.com

FishKeepingBanter.com (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/index.php)
-   General (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Danios: Behaviour and appearance questions (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=24975)

FishNoob September 17th 05 10:17 AM

Danios: Behaviour and appearance questions
 
So now we have four danios (never go into a pet shop with three
children and the intention to buy two fish). Two are zebra, two are
leopard. They were put into the tank yesterday afternoon.

As of this morning, two of them - one zebra, one leopard - appear
very yellow in colour. I found a photo on-line which showed zebra
danios in both black-and-white and black-and-yellow tones, so
presumably the colouring itself is normal, but is it usual for them
to change colour? They weren't noticeably yellow yesterday. The other
two fish look just the same as yesterday.

Two of them - again, one of each, but not the same pair - seem very
aggressive towards the others, chasing and seeming to nip at them. Is
this normal behaviour?

The non-yellow leopard danio looks fat - would it be noticeable if it
was pregnant? (This is one of the less agressive two, it also seems
to be moving a bit slower than the others, and less interested in
shoaling.)

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.

--
FishNoob

Gill Passman September 17th 05 10:40 AM

FishNoob wrote:
So now we have four danios (never go into a pet shop with three
children and the intention to buy two fish). Two are zebra, two are
leopard. They were put into the tank yesterday afternoon.

As of this morning, two of them - one zebra, one leopard - appear
very yellow in colour. I found a photo on-line which showed zebra
danios in both black-and-white and black-and-yellow tones, so
presumably the colouring itself is normal, but is it usual for them
to change colour? They weren't noticeably yellow yesterday. The other
two fish look just the same as yesterday.

Two of them - again, one of each, but not the same pair - seem very
aggressive towards the others, chasing and seeming to nip at them. Is
this normal behaviour?

The non-yellow leopard danio looks fat - would it be noticeable if it
was pregnant? (This is one of the less agressive two, it also seems
to be moving a bit slower than the others, and less interested in
shoaling.)

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.

Your pH sounds a little bit low to me. What is it out of the tap? You
might need to take some action on this if this is the tap water - others
will be better qualified to advise on this.

Gill

Mean_Chlorine September 17th 05 12:10 PM

Thusly FishNoob Spake Unto All:

As of this morning, two of them - one zebra, one leopard - appear
very yellow in colour. I found a photo on-line which showed zebra
danios in both black-and-white and black-and-yellow tones, so
presumably the colouring itself is normal, but is it usual for them
to change colour? They weren't noticeably yellow yesterday. The other
two fish look just the same as yesterday.


This:
http://mikes-machine.mine.nu/specime...o_DSC_0324.jpg
is what a zebra danio looks like.
Leopard danio is believed (it is not certain) to be a breed of zebra
danio, and has much the same base coloration.
Neither are ever, AFAIK, white.

Two of them - again, one of each, but not the same pair - seem very
aggressive towards the others, chasing and seeming to nip at them. Is
this normal behaviour?


Yes. Males are somewhat territorial.

The non-yellow leopard danio looks fat - would it be noticeable if it
was pregnant?


Yes, females are much plumper than males.

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.


That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons,
you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones
in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5). Now, 5
isn't lethally low, but many fish will have problems reproducing at
that pH, and at 4.5 some fish will start to die. You also can not keep
snails or shrimp at a pH under 6.



Guido September 17th 05 05:11 PM

Mean_Chlorine wrote:

This:
http://mikes-machine.mine.nu/specime...o_DSC_0324.jpg
is what a zebra danio looks like.


That's a great picture! I've never had my long-fin zebras stay still
long enough to get a shot like that!

Elaine T September 17th 05 08:13 PM

FishNoob wrote:
So now we have four danios (never go into a pet shop with three
children and the intention to buy two fish). Two are zebra, two are
leopard. They were put into the tank yesterday afternoon.


ROFL! My BF is like that in fish stores. You'll be fine with four danios.

As of this morning, two of them - one zebra, one leopard - appear
very yellow in colour. I found a photo on-line which showed zebra
danios in both black-and-white and black-and-yellow tones, so
presumably the colouring itself is normal, but is it usual for them
to change colour? They weren't noticeably yellow yesterday. The other
two fish look just the same as yesterday.


Fish like danios subtly change colors all the time. They tend to go
pale when stressed and darken when they're content. Some fish will show
or lose stripes as well. If a bunch of fish in your tank suddenly go
pale and still, they're "telling" you that something is amiss.

Two of them - again, one of each, but not the same pair - seem very
aggressive towards the others, chasing and seeming to nip at them. Is
this normal behaviour?

The non-yellow leopard danio looks fat - would it be noticeable if it
was pregnant? (This is one of the less agressive two, it also seems
to be moving a bit slower than the others, and less interested in
shoaling.)


It's either carrying eggs or unwell. In many small, shoaling species,
male fish are thinner than females and often have slightly deeper color.
If the fat fish's scales start to stick out from its body, it is sick
with a disease called "dropsy." Let's hope that's not the case.

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.


Your water must be very soft. There IS an advantage to having a low pH
while your tank cycles. Ammonia is much less toxic at low pH. However,
bacteria don't grow very well below pH 5.5. If there is not much
ammonia yet, I'd try to gently raise the pH to around 7.

In the short term, since there's no ammonia, add 1/4 US tsp (there's
about 5 ml of volume in a US teaspoon; I don't know how many grams) of
predissolved baking soda (sodium bicarbonate, bicarbonate of soda,
bicarb) to your tank today. The pH and KH will rise and then fall again
over the next 24 hours.

Test pH and ammonia again tomorrow. If pH isn't up to 7 or higher and
ammonia stays below 0.5 ppm (it should since you have some nitrite but
you never know), add another 1/4 tsp of baking soda. This *should* be
enough baking soda, but you can repeat this for two more days if necessary.

In the long term, you have a couple of options. For a planted tank, use
a buffer like Seqchem's Equilibrium when you change water. It's
designed to set the pH at 7.0 and supply essential nutrients for plants.

Another easy, natural way to control pH is to put a form of calcium
carbonate in the tank or filter. It will slowly dissolve and increase
both the general hardness and pH (carbonate hardness, to be more
precise) with no fiddling on your part. Seashells, crushed coral, or
limestone all work. The more you add, the higher the pH will go, up to
a maximum of 8.4. Livebearers in particular appreciate water that's
been hardened with limestone.

Finally, you can keep using baking soda, adding more when you change
water. You can do this if you end up choosing a tank full of soft water
fish and don't need a buffer like Equilibrium.

--
Elaine T __
http://eethomp.com/fish.html '__
rec.aquaria.* FAQ http://faq.thekrib.com

Mean_Chlorine September 17th 05 09:02 PM

Thusly Guido Spake Unto All:

This:
http://mikes-machine.mine.nu/specime...o_DSC_0324.jpg
is what a zebra danio looks like.


That's a great picture! I've never had my long-fin zebras stay still
long enough to get a shot like that!


Glad you like it; zebras are so hyperactive it took me ages to get a
decent shot, and it's still not as good as I'd like.

It came as a surprise to at least me that zebras have so much blue on
them.


FishNoob September 18th 05 05:36 PM

In article ,
says...
PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.


That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons,
you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones
in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5).


So it's okay to put some limestone in? I read some websites that said
that rocks were okay to add as long as they *weren't* limestone, so
we collected some rocks and tested them. We set aside those that
contained limestone, but there are a couple of great ones (the kids
particularly like the one that looks like a fossil of an alien's head
G), so if we *can* use them...

I also read somewhere (thought it was here, but can't find it here
now) that placing some seashells in the tank will increase the ph. I
can find a few websites that offer that advice - eg
http://www.fishtanksandponds.net/set...tank_decor.htm -
but other websites that say "under no circumstances". Opinions
please...

(Hoping that it's okay, because after I read it and before I read not
to do it, we went off seashell-collecting today LOL. If it *is* okay,
how many seashells are we talking? Most of those we've got are an
inch across or less. We also got some that look like snail-shells -
empty ones! - is it the same for them?)

This is a really good interest for someone who loves to learn LOL

--
FishNoob

Mean_Chlorine September 18th 05 06:57 PM

Thusly FishNoob Spake Unto All:

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.


That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons,
you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones
in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5).


So it's okay to put some limestone in? I read some websites that said
that rocks were okay to add as long as they *weren't* limestone


Yeah, that's because most websites don't know anything at all about
water chemistry, and simply quote eachother and/or books by authors
who don't know anything about water chemistry either, therby
perpetuating a whole range of myths.
Limestone in water will neutralize acid, and raise pH. Most of our
fishes come from water with a pH of about 6 - 8. This much everyone
know. What the websites etc miss is that the dissolution of calcium
carbonate has an endpoint at 8.3 (which, incidentally, is a 100% safe
pH), and that the process speed decreases the closer you get to 8.3,
so the actual pH in an aquarium filled with limestone will stabilize
around 7.5. That is, you _can not_ kill your fish by raising pH with
limestone. You will never reach dangerously high pH's. Ever.

Then there's the issue of "the right pH". The importance of, and the
sensitivity of fish to, pH is monstrously exaggerated in aquaristics.
Fact of the matter is, pH 7.5 is _perfect_ for every freshwater fish
on this earth EXCEPT if you're breeding (and I do mean breeding, not
just keeping) blackwater fish like neons or if you're a high-tech
plant aquarist who want maximum amount of free CO2 in the water. The
reason you may need to lower pH when breeding blackwater fish is
because the fish may use low pH as a trigger for spawning, or the egg
membranes may become impermeable to the sperm. The adult fish' health
is completely unaffected.

Every fish on earth, including the marine ones, will also greatly
prefer a stable pH over a fluctuating one, and the limestone will make
the pH stable.

In your case, with your very low pH, a limestone (or shells etc) may
actually be a lifesaver for your fish.

I also read somewhere (thought it was here, but can't find it here
now) that placing some seashells in the tank will increase the ph. I


Yes, anything that's made of calcium carbonate: shells, fossils,
limestone, chalk, even eggshells, but NOT blackboard chalk (that's
calcium SULPHATE, aka gypsum, and will not buffer pH at all).



Steve September 18th 05 07:34 PM

FishNoob wrote:
In article ,
says...

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite

is 0.1.


That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons,
you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones
in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5).



So it's okay to put some limestone in? I read some websites that said
that rocks were okay to add as long as they *weren't* limestone, so
we collected some rocks and tested them. We set aside those that
contained limestone, but there are a couple of great ones (the kids
particularly like the one that looks like a fossil of an alien's head
G), so if we *can* use them...


I keep a small bag of "crushed coral" - i.e. limestone - in each of my
filters. It's to add some alkalinity (carbonate hardness) and buffer pH.
That's because my city water is soft, about 35 ppm (total hardness or
carbonate hardness - the test kit is not clear which it measures). The
crushed coral/ limestone gives me about 80 ppm "hardness" and a pH of
7.1 to 7.3, so I can be confident there will be not pH "crashes" toward
acidity.

Using carbonate in the filter is recommended by several aquarium books
I've read. Using pieces of limestone should be pefectly all right,
unless you want low hardness and acid conditions.

I think that rocks to be avoided are those containing sulphide or
arsenide minerals (pyrite, arsenopyrite...), and perhaps sulphates (gypsum).

I hope you keep having fun with the aquarium!

Steve

Elaine T September 18th 05 08:50 PM

Mean_Chlorine wrote:
Thusly FishNoob Spake Unto All:


PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite

is 0.1.

That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons,
you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones
in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5).


So it's okay to put some limestone in? I read some websites that said
that rocks were okay to add as long as they *weren't* limestone



Yeah, that's because most websites don't know anything at all about
water chemistry, and simply quote eachother and/or books by authors
who don't know anything about water chemistry either, therby
perpetuating a whole range of myths.
Limestone in water will neutralize acid, and raise pH. Most of our
fishes come from water with a pH of about 6 - 8. This much everyone
know. What the websites etc miss is that the dissolution of calcium
carbonate has an endpoint at 8.3 (which, incidentally, is a 100% safe
pH), and that the process speed decreases the closer you get to 8.3,
so the actual pH in an aquarium filled with limestone will stabilize
around 7.5. That is, you _can not_ kill your fish by raising pH with
limestone. You will never reach dangerously high pH's. Ever.


You've got me curious because I've not seen pH stabilize around 7.5 when
I fill a tank calcium carbonate. I've always had hard, high pH
tapwater, though. When I stuff a tank with carbonates, it's usually for
marine fish or Tanganyikan cichlids and with hard water to start with,
the pH generally ends up above 8.0. If you have time to elaborate on
the equilibrium chemistry for soft water or have a link, I'd enjoy
taking a look.

--
Elaine T __
http://eethomp.com/fish.html '__
rec.aquaria.* FAQ http://faq.thekrib.com

Mean_Chlorine September 19th 05 12:11 AM

Thusly Elaine T Spake Unto All:

You've got me curious because I've not seen pH stabilize around 7.5 when
I fill a tank calcium carbonate. I've always had hard, high pH
tapwater, though. When I stuff a tank with carbonates, it's usually for
marine fish or Tanganyikan cichlids and with hard water to start with,
the pH generally ends up above 8.0. If you have time to elaborate on
the equilibrium chemistry for soft water or have a link, I'd enjoy
taking a look.


If you start with very hard water, it'll take very long for the acids
and CO2 produced by your fish & plants to drive pH down to where the
limestone will start reacting; quite possibly it'll never happen if
you top up with hard water or do regular water changes - the buffering
capacity of the water itself is such that the buffering capacity of
the limestone never comes in to play.

That is, you start with so hard water that it doesn't matter what
rocks you put in. If you start with very soft water, you'll tend to
end up around 7.5.

Very hard natural water will at equilibrium have a pH of 8.3. This is
the highest pH you can get with bicarbonate (the product of limestone
dissolution and chief buffering component of natural waters).
Natural waters with a pH significantly higher than that (e.g.
Tanganyika, with a pH of 9 - 9.2) get that pH either because 'soda'
(hydroxide) is leaching into the water from the surrounding sediments,
or because there is so heavy plant growth that bicarbonate becomes
depleted (the CO2 content of the water is not at equilibrium with the
atmosphere).

Also, and don't take this the wrong way, but unless you're using a
recently calibrated electronic pH meter, ie you use
drip-titration-kits or, worse, pH paper or multisticks, you don't
actually know your pH with greater accuracy than +/- 0.5 to 1 unit,
regardless of what it says on the box.



Elaine T September 19th 05 04:11 AM

Mean_Chlorine wrote:
Thusly Elaine T Spake Unto All:


You've got me curious because I've not seen pH stabilize around 7.5 when
I fill a tank calcium carbonate. I've always had hard, high pH
tapwater, though. When I stuff a tank with carbonates, it's usually for
marine fish or Tanganyikan cichlids and with hard water to start with,
the pH generally ends up above 8.0. If you have time to elaborate on
the equilibrium chemistry for soft water or have a link, I'd enjoy
taking a look.



If you start with very hard water, it'll take very long for the acids
and CO2 produced by your fish & plants to drive pH down to where the
limestone will start reacting; quite possibly it'll never happen if
you top up with hard water or do regular water changes - the buffering
capacity of the water itself is such that the buffering capacity of
the limestone never comes in to play.

That is, you start with so hard water that it doesn't matter what
rocks you put in. If you start with very soft water, you'll tend to
end up around 7.5.

Very hard natural water will at equilibrium have a pH of 8.3. This is
the highest pH you can get with bicarbonate (the product of limestone
dissolution and chief buffering component of natural waters).
Natural waters with a pH significantly higher than that (e.g.
Tanganyika, with a pH of 9 - 9.2) get that pH either because 'soda'
(hydroxide) is leaching into the water from the surrounding sediments,
or because there is so heavy plant growth that bicarbonate becomes
depleted (the CO2 content of the water is not at equilibrium with the
atmosphere).

Also, and don't take this the wrong way, but unless you're using a
recently calibrated electronic pH meter, ie you use
drip-titration-kits or, worse, pH paper or multisticks, you don't
actually know your pH with greater accuracy than +/- 0.5 to 1 unit,
regardless of what it says on the box.

Thanks - that makes sense. Basically you're saying that bicarbonate
from calcium carbonate only reaches its 8.3 pKa in natural waters where
the amount of limestone is huge and the water has years of slow contact,
right?

I mostly use liquid bromthymol or bromphenol blue for measuring pH
around neutral. I'm not sure what the indicator is for my liquid high
range kit. However, you reminded me of the classic science lab
experiment where you put a drop of BTB in distilled water. Gently blow
on it for a bit and it goes yellow. Shake hard for a little while and
it goes blue. Similarly, it's wickedly hard to get a reproducible pH
measurement on a CO2 injected plant tank with a liquid kit.

I actualy don't have too much trouble with my liqid kits getting
reproducible measurements within a given day in my hardwater non-CO2
tanks (I've tried this), but you're correct that I don't know the accuracy.

--
Elaine T __
http://eethomp.com/fish.html '__
rec.aquaria.* FAQ http://faq.thekrib.com

[email protected] September 19th 05 06:27 AM

On the coloration of your Zebras... the males have a silver tone to
them while females have a golden tone between the black lines. You will
notice as they get larger, the females will become increasingly
aggressive towards the males and they will become more gold in color
and very wide. Sometimes they can be double the size of the males. A
larger group will cut down on the aggression.

On your leopards, there is a gold variety, a regular variety and a blue
variety. There is also a long finned variety, just like in Zebras. If
your fish are more gold then silver, you probably have gold leopard
danios.

Leopards (brachydanio frankei) and Zebras (brachydanio rerio) are two
different species, so they will not breed. Although, I am sure there
are hybrids; they will be more likely to breed with their own species
first. Golden zebra danios, long finned golden zebras, long finned
zebras, and short finned zebras, can all breed together since they are
the same species... just different fancy strains created from specific
breeding. Same goes for the leopard color varieties and tails listed in
the second paragraph.


Mean_Chlorine September 19th 05 10:19 AM

Thusly Elaine T Spake Unto All:

Thanks - that makes sense. Basically you're saying that bicarbonate
from calcium carbonate only reaches its 8.3 pKa in natural waters where
the amount of limestone is huge and the water has years of slow contact,
right?


Pretty much, although in most cases you'll never actually reach 8.3.
Even in areas where the bedrock is limestone, natural surface waters
usually have a pH of 7.5 - 7.7-ish.

I actualy don't have too much trouble with my liqid kits getting
reproducible measurements within a given day in my hardwater non-CO2
tanks (I've tried this), but you're correct that I don't know the accuracy.


The liquid kits usually aren't bad, and for normal aquarium use you
don't need to know the pH with greater accuracy than 0.5 - 1 unit; pH
is simply not that critical unless you have a specialty aquarium (e.g.
high-tech plant tank or maintain a pH below 6 or above 9). The pH
papers and multisticks, however, are atrocious. Maybe they're OK when
they're fresh from the factory, but after a year or so on the shelf
they're usually so wildly off that one IME is better off without them.



Mean_Chlorine September 19th 05 10:19 AM

Thusly " Spake
Unto All:

Leopards (brachydanio frankei) and Zebras (brachydanio rerio) are two
different species, so they will not breed.


AFA is known that is not true. The leopard has never, despite
considerable effort, been found in nature, and is now believed to be a
captive-bred strain of zebra danio, and /Danio frankei/ is today
considered a synonym of /Danio rerio/, with which it will also
interbreed. However, the leopard danio has reduced fertility, which
*might* indicate that it itself is a hybrid between /D. rerio/ and
some other species of /Danio/.

The genus /Brachydanio/ is today considered a synonym of /Danio/,
comprising most of the small species of danios, whereas the genus
/Devario/ comprises most of the big species (e.g. /Devario
aequipinnatus/, the common giant danio).

Also, FWIW, I do not recall ever having seen a silver or blue strain
of leopard danio or zebra danio. I have seen albinos & partial
albinos, though.


NetMax September 20th 05 03:32 AM

"Steve" wrote in message
...
FishNoob wrote:
In article ,
says...

PH is between 5.0 and 6.0 (bit closer to 6), ammonia is 0 and nitrite
is 0.1.

That's a low pH. Unless you are breeding sof****er fish like neons,
you'd have greater margin of safety if you put a couple of limestones
in the tank (which'll buffer the water and give a pH of 7.5).



So it's okay to put some limestone in? I read some websites that said
that rocks were okay to add as long as they *weren't* limestone, so we
collected some rocks and tested them. We set aside those that contained
limestone, but there are a couple of great ones (the kids particularly
like the one that looks like a fossil of an alien's head G), so if we
*can* use them...


I keep a small bag of "crushed coral" - i.e. limestone - in each of my
filters. It's to add some alkalinity (carbonate hardness) and buffer pH.
That's because my city water is soft, about 35 ppm (total hardness or
carbonate hardness - the test kit is not clear which it measures). The
crushed coral/ limestone gives me about 80 ppm "hardness" and a pH of 7.1
to 7.3, so I can be confident there will be not pH "crashes" toward
acidity.

Using carbonate in the filter is recommended by several aquarium books
I've read. Using pieces of limestone should be pefectly all right, unless
you want low hardness and acid conditions.

I think that rocks to be avoided are those containing sulphide or arsenide
minerals (pyrite, arsenopyrite...), and perhaps sulphates (gypsum).

I hope you keep having fun with the aquarium!

Steve


I don't have any experience using limestone, but I've been told that because
of its composition, it leeches very slowly. Depending on application, this
can be advantageous, or you might find it ineffective. I usually used
crushed coral in medium sized chunks (about 1" pieces). With bigger pieces,
the surface area is decreased (slower leeching) and with smaller pieces, the
water flow around them decreases (again slower leeching) unless they are in
a filter. However, despite often reading the recommendation to use crushed
coral in a filter, I've found it to be only mildly effective there. The
water flow is great, but the quantity which you can put into a filter is
usually too small to really be as effective as I would usually prefer to
have. If you take an extra canister filter and fill it entirely, you'll get
better results (if you need it).
--
www.NetMax.tk



2pods September 20th 05 01:42 PM


If you start with very hard water, it'll take very long for the acids
and CO2 produced by your fish & plants to drive pH down to where the
limestone will start reacting; quite possibly it'll never happen if
you top up with hard water or do regular water changes - the buffering
capacity of the water itself is such that the buffering capacity of
the limestone never comes in to play.
That is, you start with so hard water that it doesn't matter what
rocks you put in. If you start with very soft water, you'll tend to
end up around 7.5.

Very hard natural water will at equilibrium have a pH of 8.3. This is
the highest pH you can get with bicarbonate (the product of limestone
dissolution and chief buffering component of natural waters).
Natural waters with a pH significantly higher than that (e.g.
Tanganyika, with a pH of 9 - 9.2) get that pH either because 'soda'
(hydroxide) is leaching into the water from the surrounding sediments,
or because there is so heavy plant growth that bicarbonate becomes
depleted (the CO2 content of the water is not at equilibrium with the
atmosphere).


This is very helpful to me as both my Juwel tanks ( 400ltr and 60ltr) ph
drops all the time.

Liqiud API test kit says 6.0, but I'm not so sure, as even after a 20% water
change it only goes up to 6.4.

So assuming I want to use crushed coral or limestone (any online UK sources
? ), how much would I need for each tank ?

Also, the 400ltr has a Rena XP3 external with a bio compartment.
Would I be better putting the coral inside the filter ?

Thanks,

Peter



Mean_Chlorine September 20th 05 03:18 PM

Thusly "2pods" Spake Unto All:

This is very helpful to me as both my Juwel tanks ( 400ltr and 60ltr) ph
drops all the time.


That is possible, but unlikely. If you have, say, very large amounts
of driftwood or peat, or add CO2 to the tank, or you only use RO/DI
water, then you can get very low pH. Otherwise it is almost impossible
to get a pH unsuitable for fish in aquaria; pH is really a non-issue
in aquaria except for advanced aquarists, and then only because those
screw around with water parameters a lot (and usually unnecessarily).
Limestone is good because it smoothes out fluctuations and steadies
the pH at a nice level, but even without you are unlikely to see
dangerously low pH's unless, as I said, you're an advanced aquarist.

Liqiud API test kit says 6.0, but I'm not so sure, as even after a 20% water
change it only goes up to 6.4.


Have you tested your tap-water?
What does your waterworks say the pH of your tapwater should be?

So assuming I want to use crushed coral or limestone (any online UK sources
? ), how much would I need for each tank ?


It's impossible to say, but the beauty of it is that you can't hurt
your fish by overdosing. Put some shells or something in, see if it
helps, if not, add more.
But I suspect your real problem is with your pH test kit - in most
cases when people measure really low or really high pH in their tanks,
it's really a case of inaccurate or aged test kits.

Also, the 400ltr has a Rena XP3 external with a bio compartment.
Would I be better putting the coral inside the filter ?


You'll get faster/bigger effect the more finely ground the limestone
is, and the more water flows past it, but the effect will never really
be either fast or big. Limestone simply reacts slowly at pH's around
neutral.

A quicker way is to directly modify the alkalinity of the water
through adding bikarbonate, but when it comes to pH quick changes are
not always a good idea, and I normally suggest using limestone
instead.


2pods September 20th 05 03:40 PM


"Mean_Chlorine" wrote in message
...
Thusly "2pods" Spake Unto All:

This is very helpful to me as both my Juwel tanks ( 400ltr and 60ltr) ph
drops all the time.


That is possible, but unlikely. If you have, say, very large amounts
of driftwood or peat, or add CO2 to the tank, or you only use RO/DI
water, then you can get very low pH. Otherwise it is almost impossible
to get a pH unsuitable for fish in aquaria; pH is really a non-issue
in aquaria except for advanced aquarists, and then only because those
screw around with water parameters a lot (and usually unnecessarily).
Limestone is good because it smoothes out fluctuations and steadies
the pH at a nice level, but even without you are unlikely to see
dangerously low pH's unless, as I said, you're an advanced aquarist
Liqiud API test kit says 6.0, but I'm not so sure, as even after a 20%
water

change it only goes up to 6.4.


Have you tested your tap-water?


Yes, it's dead on 7.0

What does your waterworks say the pH of your tapwater should be?


7.0

So assuming I want to use crushed coral or limestone (any online UK
sources
? ), how much would I need for each tank ?


It's impossible to say, but the beauty of it is that you can't hurt
your fish by overdosing. Put some shells or something in, see if it
helps, if not, add more.
But I suspect your real problem is with your pH test kit - in most
cases when people measure really low or really high pH in their tanks,
it's really a case of inaccurate or aged test kits.


All three test kits, of different brands ?

The only difference between the affected tanks (400 and 60 ltr) and the
unaffected tank (240ltr) is the fact that the plants in the low pH tanks
(Cabomba, Watersprite, Hygrophillia) are growing well, while the "normal pH
tank (6.8 - 7.0) has less plants and has lots of algae.

All three tanks have gravel and use the same dechlor with a weekly water
change.

Also, the 400ltr has a Rena XP3 external with a bio compartment.
Would I be better putting the coral inside the filter ?


You'll get faster/bigger effect the more finely ground the limestone
is, and the more water flows past it, but the effect will never really
be either fast or big. Limestone simply reacts slowly at pH's around
neutral.
A quicker way is to directly modify the alkalinity of the water
through adding bikarbonate, but when it comes to pH quick changes are
not always a good idea, and I normally suggest using limestone
instead.

quick = bad for fish

Peter




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FishKeepingBanter.com