What if the Nazis were nice?
Ditto, like my new.cox.net server did to the original.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Jeff Strickland wrote: > > Sorry, I shoulda trimmed the groups. > > Having said that, I woulda trimmed this group and left the others. |
"Rich Hampel" > wrote in message ... > Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE nazis..... > Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control > ..... so therefore by todays definition 'nazis' would be closer to far > left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other > philosophy than their own. Intolerance is found on both sides of the aisle. Whether it comes from the left or right depends on the philosophy. Nazi-style Fascism is for the most part a conservative philosophy, as opposed to Communism, which is for the most part a liberal philosophy. Historically, both philosphies played from the same political gamebook, however. |
Matt, I agree with what you're saying. It's commonly believed that the
Nazis were far right, and in some ways they were, but they were actually into socialism of which few today are aware of... which is what the far left also believes in. So the Nazis did have more in common with today's far-left than few know or would suspect. The Nazi party did espouse socialsim, just in a different manner than Marxism did. Nazi is actually an abbreviation for Nationalsozialismus which translates to "National Socialism". Today's "right" certainly has no beliefs in socliasm as the Nazi party did, the 'right' and the Nazis are as far apart from each other in their core ideologies as they could possibly be. Oh, does the term " National Socialist German Workers Party" which is the proper name for the Nazi party remind anyone of anything on the Left? If it doesn't, zone in on the "Workers Party" part. ;) Jerry Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > "Rich Hampel" > wrote in message > ... > >>Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE nazis..... >>Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control >>..... so therefore by todays definition 'nazis' would be closer to far >>left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other >>philosophy than their own. > > > Intolerance is found on both sides of the aisle. Whether it comes from the > left or right depends on the philosophy. Nazi-style Fascism is for the most > part a conservative philosophy, as opposed to Communism, which is for the > most part a liberal philosophy. Historically, both philosphies played from > the same political gamebook, however. > > -- Jerry Bransford PP-ASEL N6TAY See the Geezer Jeep at http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ |
Yup, that's why Hitler made the People's Car. And took the right of
the people to own firearms. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Intolerance is found on both sides of the aisle. Whether it comes from the > left or right depends on the philosophy. Nazi-style Fascism is for the most > part a conservative philosophy, as opposed to Communism, which is for the > most part a liberal philosophy. Historically, both philosphies played from > the same political gamebook, however. |
Bill, permit me to correct thing you said. The Weimar Republic actually
launched firearm registration and confiscation in hopes the keep firearms out of the hands of the Fascists, Communists and the FreeKorps. When the National Socialists came to power in 1933, the registration lists were used to confiscate the few remaining private firearms. Norm "L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message ... Yup, that's why Hitler made the People's Car. And took the right of the people to own firearms. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Intolerance is found on both sides of the aisle. Whether it comes from the > left or right depends on the philosophy. Nazi-style Fascism is for the > most > part a conservative philosophy, as opposed to Communism, which is for the > most part a liberal philosophy. Historically, both philosphies played from > the same political gamebook, however. |
So Hitler gave his people the right to own firearms, back to them?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Norm & Debbie wrote: > > Bill, permit me to correct thing you said. The Weimar Republic actually > launched firearm registration and confiscation in hopes the keep firearms > out of the hands of the Fascists, Communists and the FreeKorps. When the > National Socialists came to power in 1933, the registration lists were used > to confiscate the few remaining private firearms. > > Norm |
That's not what I said - you were half right. The process of depriving the
right to own firearms started under the Weimar Republic. Norm "L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message ... So Hitler gave his people the right to own firearms, back to them? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Norm & Debbie wrote: > > Bill, permit me to correct thing you said. The Weimar Republic actually > launched firearm registration and confiscation in hopes the keep firearms > out of the hands of the Fascists, Communists and the FreeKorps. When the > National Socialists came to power in 1933, the registration lists were > used > to confiscate the few remaining private firearms. > > Norm |
Half right? Another f**king bleeding heart liberal with no
reasoning ability! God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Norm & Debbie wrote: > > That's not what I said - you were half right. The process of depriving the > right to own firearms started under the Weimar Republic. > > Norm |
Bill, I will not insulted by being labeled as liberal. I politely tried to
add to your comment by correcting you. I tried to give the historical view to that period in Germany that gave rise to National Socialism. Please read your history and don't so quick to insult people who want to help you. Norm "L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message ... Half right? Another f**king bleeding heart liberal with no reasoning ability! God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Norm & Debbie wrote: > > That's not what I said - you were half right. The process of depriving > the > right to own firearms started under the Weimar Republic. > > Norm |
Socialism??????
"This year will go down in history. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future." -- A. Hitler 1935 -- God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ Norm & Debbie wrote: > > Bill, I will not insulted by being labeled as liberal. I politely tried to > add to your comment by correcting you. I tried to give the historical view > to that period in Germany that gave rise to National Socialism. Please read > your history and don't so quick to insult people who want to help you. > > Norm > > "L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message > ... > Half right? Another f**king bleeding heart liberal with no > reasoning ability! > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > http://www.billhughes.com/ > > Norm & Debbie wrote: > > > > That's not what I said - you were half right. The process of depriving > > the > > right to own firearms started under the Weimar Republic. > > > > Norm |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com