FishKeepingBanter.com

FishKeepingBanter.com (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/index.php)
-   Reefs (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Lighting cost (http://www.fishkeepingbanter.com/showthread.php?t=15436)

david October 13th 04 10:48 AM

Lighting cost
 
I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120 gallons
and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2)
24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the pumps
etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient.
In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount of
electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO or
metal halide.



Marc Levenson October 13th 04 02:31 PM

500w is 500w. Option #2 is to remove your roof and use the
sun. :)

Marc


david wrote:
I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120 gallons
and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2)
24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the pumps
etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient.
In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount of
electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO or
metal halide.



--
Personal Page:
http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist: http://www.melevsreef.com


Robert Cadieux October 13th 04 03:09 PM


"david" wrote in message
nk.net...
I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120

gallons
and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and (2)
24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the

pumps
etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more efficient.
In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount

of
electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO

or
metal halide.


500 watts is the amount of electricity, or power to be more specific, that
the bulbs are consuming to produce light. What you really want is light
output or intensity, usually measured in lumes, lux or candles. As a
comparison you're asking for a car that attain the speed of 10 MPG when you
really want to know how fast the car goes and you should be asking how many
miles per hour it can go. Generally speaking fluorescents, such as T8, T5
and VHO bulbs are somewhat more efficient than metal halide and much more
efficient than traditionnal incadescent bulbs. But the lighting is
different with fluorescents. The light is more difuse and you don't get
that shimmering effect you get with MH.

Two things you may consider. Using a combination of fluorescents and MH.
Keep half of the MH running, 250W, for about 4-5 hours a day and replace the
other with about 125 watts of actinic and T5 fluorescent lighting. That way
your peak consumption will be 375 watts for 4-5 hours and down to 125 for
the rest. Most corals do fine with this combination.

The other is that MH give off lots of heat. This may very well offset your
heating costs in the winter which means your electric bill will only really
be higher during the summer.

Robert



Cindy October 13th 04 06:59 PM



The other is that MH give off lots of heat. This may very well
offset your heating costs in the winter which means your electric
bill will only really be higher during the summer.

Robert


Hmmm, which would be a bad thing here where the air conditioning bills run
higher than the heating bills....

Cindy



J. Bednar October 16th 04 01:38 AM

Wrong, Halides are more efficient than Fluorescent bulbs. The heat in a
halide is more concentrated
so it seems more inefficient, but it's not.

jb

"Robert Cadieux" wrote in message
...

"david" wrote in message
nk.net...
I am about three months into starting my first reef tank. It is 120

gallons
and I am using an aquaspacelight with (2) 250W metal Halide bulbs and

(2)
24W Blue lights. I have noticed that these lights along with all the

pumps
etc. have almost doubled ny electric bill. Are VHOs any more

efficient.
In otherwords does anybody know whether it would require the same amount

of
electricty to produce 500 watts of light regardless of whether it is VHO

or
metal halide.


500 watts is the amount of electricity, or power to be more specific, that
the bulbs are consuming to produce light. What you really want is light
output or intensity, usually measured in lumes, lux or candles. As a
comparison you're asking for a car that attain the speed of 10 MPG when

you
really want to know how fast the car goes and you should be asking how

many
miles per hour it can go. Generally speaking fluorescents, such as T8, T5
and VHO bulbs are somewhat more efficient than metal halide and much more
efficient than traditionnal incadescent bulbs. But the lighting is
different with fluorescents. The light is more difuse and you don't get
that shimmering effect you get with MH.

Two things you may consider. Using a combination of fluorescents and MH.
Keep half of the MH running, 250W, for about 4-5 hours a day and replace

the
other with about 125 watts of actinic and T5 fluorescent lighting. That

way
your peak consumption will be 375 watts for 4-5 hours and down to 125 for
the rest. Most corals do fine with this combination.

The other is that MH give off lots of heat. This may very well offset

your
heating costs in the winter which means your electric bill will only

really
be higher during the summer.

Robert






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FishKeepingBanter.com