In 1918 the GB claimed they were "appointed"
 

"Charlië" wrote in message
...

"le ténébreux" wrote in message
ng.com...
"Precision" wrote:

If you can show that Jesus would have admonished his apostles to
limit the use of such technologies in favor of making personal visits
and giving congregations more autonomy then by all means please share
those scriptures.

Well the often-asked question "What's with this archaic doorknocking?"
always seems to be answered with just the opposite. No we can't spread
the message to the public using the modern media instead, there's no
scripture that authorizes such a thing, we must do it this way because
that's how the early Christians did it, etc.

That's the wonderful thing about issues that the scriptures are silent
about. It can be said to be either "not authorized" or "not prohibited"
depending on the desired conclusion.
============================
I nominate this the post-of-the-week award! The GB/JWs have an answer for
everything and it's always something self-serving and beneficial to the
WTS
in some way.

I have yet to see any proof from anyone that they were anointed or
appointed
in any way back in 1918.

I have yet to see you post proof of ANYTHING! Where is the proof the
Clarksville
women were DF'ed?

This was just dreamed up to make more people
believe their rap and join their not-so-merry band of book peddlers.

Just like you dream up BS to post about JW's, with no proof atall.

--
Long John CH....
How did we get here?
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/
=================================