I posed comments to various unmoderated support groups about the
negative aspects of evolution, and the ramification and legal issues
that could be risen from such. The T.O moderator put a block on all
support groups from their on. He claims that their was a protest from
these group that ask for such a filter. But he never presented any.
most of the complaints came from inside the talk.origins NG, in
particular from an individual named Boikat. Who tried to run me off
internet because of comments.
when this failed, the famous JABFILTER went into effect. It is not in
perview from the charter to moderate unmoderated support groups in this
fashion. At that time he demostrated to be biased, and my participation
in the NG went down to practicly zero. which was his intent, I send a
post there from time to time to remind the newbies of the bias and
content moderation. But I personally lost interest in a group that
practice content moderation and censorship.

John Vreeland wrote:
wrote:
Just like Talk.origins. Even if a charter is devised, a moderator
does
not need to follow it. that particular group moderator practice
content
moderation. In all, that is his universe and the moderator rules.
simple
they can even moderate un moderated groups by filtering out and
blocking replies to certain specified group.

Why that is outrageous. I won't stand for it. So what did you try
to
post that got rejected by the software but did not violate the
cross-posting rules? If you are right we'll have to replace the
script
with one that can actually count.