In article ,
"Johnny" wrote:

"Daniel T." wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Johnny" wrote:

"Daniel T." wrote in message
news In article ,
"Johnny" wrote:

I see no reason to allow an abortion in cases where the fetus would
live

What do you think the government should do to stop it from happening?
What would you do if you were king?

Allow the people to vote like they are doing in the same-sex marriage
issue.
I have seen the "all persons born..." phrase in the Constitution which
attributes citizenship to persons of the United States.
If they would change that phrase to read all persons conceived, then
maybe
there would be a quicker, more well-defined solution to the abortion
dilemma.
Which fetuses should be exempted from being aborted is pretty much the
question that needs to be answered, imo.
Conceptions due to rape are non-consensual, so abortion would be allowed,
even mandated with restitution being paid to the woman who was raped by
the
rapist.

You wish to *mandate* the murder of a human being simply because of the
illegal actions of his father?

What right does that man have to the child he created via rape?

So a child is simply the man's property, and can be destroyed if the
government determines that he acquired it illegally? If this is not what
you mean, then I'm not sure how to interpret the word 'have' in your
question above.

You did not answer the question. If abortion is "not allowed", what
should be done to stop it from happening?

I DID answer the question.
I told you quite specifically what I would do.
I would allow the people to vote on this issue and settle it via
Constitutional means.
If you think Constitutional government is radical then maybe you could
conform and not be cited for treason.

The above doesn't answer the question. Let's assume that the people vote
and decide that abortion is not allowed... What should be done to stop
it from happening?