On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:31:01 -0400, "Johnny"
wrote:


"Daniel T." wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Johnny" wrote:

"Daniel T." wrote in message
news

Conceptions due to rape are non-consensual, so abortion would be
allowed,
even mandated with restitution being paid to the woman who was
raped
by
the
rapist.

You wish to *mandate* the murder of a human being simply because of
the
illegal actions of his father?

What right does that man have to the child he created via rape?

So a child is simply the man's property,

How is it the rapist's property if the rapist sowed in ground that was
unwilling to allow such action upon it?
Do you not understand what trespass against another person entails?
A rapist takes another person's property, in this case their body, and
uses
it without permission.
There is no legal right to preserve a child that is created by rape,
because
it was created via usuriousness and thievery.
The rapist is required to pay restitution, and that is with the child he
created and with money to compensate the woman who he wronged.

I'm having some trouble understanding you, and I think the disconnect
comes from you not answering my question above. Do you believe it is
moral to murder a human being simply because of the actions of his/her
father?

If this is not what
you mean, then I'm not sure how to interpret the word 'have' in your
question above.

Who are the parents of such a child?
Do you really want to bring rape babies into the world?

What if the mother wants to raise the kid, do you still think it should
be murdered?

Why should we employ sexist provisions in this?

You did not answer the question. If abortion is "not allowed", what
should be done to stop it from happening?

I DID answer the question.
I told you quite specifically what I would do.
I would allow the people to vote on this issue and settle it via
Constitutional means.
If you think Constitutional government is radical then maybe you could
conform and not be cited for treason.

The above doesn't answer the question. Let's assume that the people
vote
and decide that abortion is not allowed... What should be done to stop
it from happening?

Execute the people who perform them.

So a woman can have as many abortions as she wants, she is never held
accountable?

Sure thing.
Doesn't bother me.
She wouldn't find someone willing to abort her child nearly as easily if the
person who performs the illegal abortion is executed.
You think people are so stupid that they would abort a woman's child if they
knew they would be executed for doing so?


Of course they could, just as you can hire some one to kill some one
for you. Doctors can easily perform abortions, by diagnosing an
infection, and doing a D&C, a slightly more risky procedure than an
abortion.