On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:28:35 +1000, "Clayton Doesn't Believe In Sex Before
Rigor-Mortis" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...


Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On 30 Jun 2005 15:02:29 -0000, wrote:


Another thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer
is: What was the origin of life? How did the first simple form of
life-from which we are all supposed to have descended-come into
existence? Centuries ago, this would not have appeared to be a
problem. Most people then thought that flies could develop from
decaying meat and that a pile of old rags could spontaneously produce
mice. But, more than a hundred years ago, the French chemist Louis
Pasteur clearly demonstrated that life can come only from preexisting
life.

Are you really this stupid, or just being dishonest?

1. There is no such thing as an "evolutionist".

There is no mafia neither ;-)


2. Evolution has nothing to say on the origins of life.

Without an Origin of life, evolution can not be discussed.

3. Abiogenesis research has discovered more than you realise.


And it still can't be done in a test tube.


What....is there a fourth grade outing on the Usenet today? You don't seem
to have the most fundamental understanding of either science or logic....so
you're pretty much making a fool of yourself!

But isn't making fools of themselves what creationists do best?