duke wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 03:32:46 GMT, "Mike Painter"
wrote:


ie, artificial.
See what I mean? I knew Earl would do this so I specifically
pointed out the "AND" part.
You're dreaming about your greatness, mikey. Apparently you can't
relate to the non-procreative periods in a woman's cycle as being
valid and unitive in purpose.

It's the church that makes these statements, not me.

The reference is to your fallible interpretation.
I quoted and made no interpretation.

The sexual act is unitive even when it isn't procreative. God made
it that way. Artificial contraception reduces the unitive to
pleasure for the satisfaction of other than procreative and/or
unitive.

Irrelevant to what the RCC says.

You mean what you're dreaming it says.

Then show direct quotes from your catechism that contradicts what I quoted
from your catechism.



You can bs your little atheist buddies, mikey, but I'm too smart for
you.
I guess Earl is so used to getting just an egg when he orders "ham
and eggs" that he never will understand
Gotcha.
Sure Earl, enjoy your egg.

I do, I do.