"A campaign in France to exterminate frogs may sound like the beginning of a civil war,
but these are no ordinary frogs."
article he http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article307312.ece
k :-) www.blogfromthebog.com

And, what's this?

*Had they been a delicacy for humans, the American interlopers might have
been tolerated. Unfortunately for them, they are inedible (even their
enormous legs).*

If bullfrog legs aren't edible, just what frog leg's are used in those
dishes?

Tongue-firmly-in-cheek (not meaning to offend any of our French ponders)
isn't there some rumor about the French thinking with their stomach? They
would tolerate their native species destruction if the frogs were edible?

All I can say is good luck, they were introduced in 1969, I'd say the frog
has the upper hand. Another invasion the French allow to go on for far too
long before taking up arms. I am tickled that they blamed it on
"California" bullfrogs. K30, weren't these frogs originally brought to the
states from Europe? ~ jan


~Power to the Porg, Flow On!~