Rudy Canoza wrote:
Dogs clearly do not have the next three.


And you have no evidence that they don't.

Not my burden of proof, dumbo. If you assert that
something is so, it is up to you to support your claim.

Get busy.


Yes Rudy, get busy supporting your claim. I have done my part already.

You've done ****ing nothing. You've made an assertion
- "dogs are self aware" - and you have done nothing to
support it. Stop lying.

It is impermissible in debate for you to make a claim,
then say that because no one else has disproved it, the
claim must be true. That is not a proof of the truth
of your claim. If you weren't an ignorant ****, you'd
know that.

Where have I said that dogs are self-aware? Please, quote me where I
have said that. If you could control your language and temper, and
actually take the time to read and understand, you would realise that
never have I claimed that dogs are self-aware, and that YOU are
repeatedly claiming that they are not self-aware without anything to
support your claim. At this point, it is safe to assume that you have
nothing to support your claim that dogs are not self-aware, and
whatever you post comes out of nothing else but your simple little
mind. You already showed me that you make up things, like claiming that
I declared dogs have self-awareness.