NanK wrote:
wrote:


The thing is that there isn't so much an absence of evidence, but
simply a lack of consensus in the intepretations of the possible
evidence.


Haven't you noticed that RC hasn't commented on any of the scientific
links I've sent, nor has he supplied links (from reputable sources)
which support his (rudely) expressed position? Instead, he gets his
undies in a bunch and calls anyone receptive to dialog vulgar names.

Methinks it's time to save intelligent conversation for people
interested in exploring the topic instead of responding to his temper
tantrums.

n

His beliefs and statements are questionable in my view, even though he
believes they are not, and I am curious as to where he comes up with
such ideas. I am capable of going past the name calling, even though
Rudy hasn't.

The links you have sent do not raise such questions in my mind that I
want to explore in a simple and unsufficient medium like the internet.