Thread
:
underwater gravel
View Single Post
#
2
December 20th 06, 01:34 AM posted to rec.aquaria.freshwater.goldfish
carlrs
external usenet poster
Posts: 227
underwater gravel
amosf © Tim Fairchild wrote:
wrote:
http://weloveteaching.com/puregold/c...re1.htm#GRAVEL
GRAVEL
Gravel is not recommended for keeping goldfish.
Interesting opinion, but...
1. Gravel is the leading cause of sudden death when gravel gets stuck in
their throat.
Possible perhaps, but never seen it actually happen.
2. Food drifts down into gravel and rots. Goldfish will sift and work
thru the
gravel looking for food. Rotting food is toxic for goldfish.
I imagine rotting food is potentially bad for all fish, but then that's why
you clean the gravel. Mind you I notice fish tend not to eat 'rotting
food'. They tend to be a little selective.
3. Gravel creates "dead" spots where anaerobic bacteria thrive and secrete
toxic gases.
Toxic gasses? Ammonia perhaps. Of course that's why you clean gravel.
4. Organic compounds contribute to the waste in the tank, driving up
nitrate levels. High organic loads in gravel can easily equal the waste
output of an extra fish for two which drastically lowers the "carrying
capacity" of the tank (1 gf per 10 gallons).
Nitrate factory, sure. That's why you clean the gravel. Nitrates can be
great, but we know about plants and goldfish
5. Organic compounds are acidic and can lower the pH to the point that it
kills off the biobugs. The nitrite converting bacteria are the first to
die, which causes a
nitrous acid spike. This will cause a sudden crash that kills the entire
biofilter. Unlike cycling, where the keeper knows and is checking for
wastes and changing water, sudden crashes are not detected until the fish
are showing severe symptoms.
That's why you clean the gravel. And of course with correct kH the pH is not
going to crash on you... And we all check the parameters now and then,
right
6. It is more work to clean gravel and do water changes. Any gravel or
rocks on the bottom require a bell of some kinds to suck up debris that
gets caught under the items. In a bare bottom tank, the circulation of the
water in the tank means all the crud and wastes are sucked out by the
filter intake. There is no siphoning required.
If you want to save work maybe, but I like the look of gravel and it gives
you somewhere to stick plants (anubias with gf of course - as well as some
salad for them to snack on). But even in a bare bottom you have to clean up
wastes. The crap still sits all over the bottom anyway.
7. Fish can be sucked up into a siphon bell and be maimed or killed every
time the
gravel is cleaned. When there is no gravel to clean, a nylon sockie can
be put over the siphon and even fry wont get sucked out with the waste
water.
This is the silliest one. The whole idea of the bell siphon is to reduce the
suction so that the gravel isn't sucked out. Fish don't get sucked into the
siphon. And fry? In a goldfish tank? Yum!
Not great reasons to go to a bare bottom. Point 6 to make vacuuming easier
maybe.
But this was about UGF, and with UGF you change many of the points above in
that there is circulation in the gravel and so it's not "anaerobic"...
All great points!! Especially the final one. I was typing my answer
while doing other computer work and answering calls (which took a
while), so I appolgize for any similar answer.
Carl
carlrs
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by carlrs
Find all threads started by carlrs