View Single Post
  #8  
Old January 4th 07, 10:56 PM posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
kim gross
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Watts per gallon rule


Wayne,

Someday you need to learn how to read. There is a good measurement that
will give usable info PAR or PUR, the only problem is that the tool to
measure it is to expensive for most hobbiests.

Watts per gallon is meaningless.


Let me give you an example. I setup a 125 gallon tank for a friend of
mine that has 150 watts of light on it. What corals can he keep in that
tank?




Wayne Sallee wrote:
While the watts per gallon rule is not perfect, I find it interesting
when people knock it as being of no value, and then they can't even come
up with anything better.

Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets



kim gross wrote on 12/30/2006 5:51 AM:
RubenD wrote:
Watts per gallon is the worst measurement for light just because of the
reasons you list. It does not take into account the depth of the tank
or where in the tank you are putting the creatures.

What is the best measurement for lighting then?


There is no good measurement for hobbiests. If you had the equipment
you could measure the par in different places in your tank and then
see if the coral you were looking at would survive with that amount of
par.


I supposed the coral under the bulb is the winner regardless of the
watts/gallon rule or the size of the tank, but how much light would be
acceptable? If I place the coral under the 30watts bulb, he'll be
getting
not 6w but 30w, right?


Close but not quite. If the light was a point light source, with a
perfect reflector then yes the coral would be getting all 30watts of
light


The best thing I can say is post on here what size of a tank you are
setting up and what specific corals you want to keep and where at in
the tank you want to keep them.




What you think?




Kim