Thread
:
Science/Chemistry question:
View Single Post
#
5
March 14th 07, 01:09 AM posted to rec.aquaria.marine.reefs
Wayne Sallee
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,181
Science/Chemistry question:
Actually the only thing that you are accomplishing,
is that you are waisting less RO water. That's the
only thing that you are accomplishing.
If you do a 15% water change, then you are still
doing a 15% water change even if the water is more
concentrated.
If you add 30 gallons worth of sea water strength
water, or it's equivalent value of diluted strength,
you are still only removing from your tank a 30
gallon equivalent of phosphate.
Wayne Sallee
Wayne's Pets
KurtG wrote on 3/13/2007 11:51 AM:
George Patterson wrote:
drain my
tank down to a specific point on the glass (ie. 25 gallons low),
Yep, it's less efficient, but it does enable the mark on the tank
technique which seems to be more or less standard based on every book
I've read.
I opted against this for two reasons:
1- less efficient at removing waste as you're diluting your tank before
draining a percentage.
2- what if you over drain by accident? If you have enough extra salt
water, you're in luck; otherwise, you're mixing up more salt water.
3- you're limited to draining only xx%. What if you want to do lower
cleaning and/or more siphon cleaning?
I'd rather keep it a bucket and use it for make up (if needed) after the
silt settles a bit. If you do that, there's no advantage to the mark on
the tank technique and a few disadvantages.
I guess it's less of a big deal now as I keep my evaporative makeup at
less then a gallon.
--Kurt
Wayne Sallee
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Wayne Sallee
Find all threads started by Wayne Sallee