DTJ wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:52:31 -0700, "Bernard Farquart"
> > wrote:
>
> >> Just look at the DemocRATs;they are rabid socialists.
> >> Dean,their chosen leader,is assuredly rabid.
> >>
> >You can not even spell the party name without making it a smear,
> >yet you call others "rabid"?
> >
> >Funny, that.
>
> While I see your point, sometimes people get so upset over the
> radicals in the other party that they stoop to the same low level that
> the radicals do.

That does not make it acceptable. It's an excuse - a way to avoid
being responsible for one's actions.

> I hate liberalism.

All that means is that you *hate.*

Nothing more. If liberalism were everything ascribed to it by it's
enemies, then it would have seen the dustbin of history long ago. Yet
radical ideas find slow acceptance, and soon enough, the Earth is no
longer the center of the universe, men no longer own other men in a
free society, and people of color may vote.

> I know a lot of democrats I like and respect.

"Some of my best friends are black."

> The fact is that anyone who wants to look at the situation objectively
> will know which party is better, or less evil.

Except that's just your bias. We know which one *you* think is less
evil - but that doesn't mean you arrived at that conclusion using pure
logic.

Other reasonable people come to just the opposite conclusion. But in
your mind, they serve evil, while you serve good.

That's just plain bigotry, and has nothing to do with logic or reason.

E.P.