In article >,
DTJ > wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:49:48 -0500,
>(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>>In article . net>,
>>Skip Elliott Bowman > wrote:
>>>"Matthew Russotto" > wrote in message
...
>>>> In article .com>,
>>>> Ed Stasiak > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>But I shouldn't have look at you blue tarp wrapped castle
>>>>>sized motorhome 364 days a year when I'm trying to relax
>>>>>in my backyard.
>>>>
>>>> You, in your backyard, are an eyesore. Maybe we can ban you?
>>>
>>>People have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their backyards, no
>>>matter what they look like. That's a lot different than using the
>>>right-of-way to store a land whale; you can't help but see that.
>>
>>Right-of-way? I'm referring to restrictions on storing it on private
>>property, not on the street. Particularly restrictions based on
>>aesthetic concerns.
>
>Sorry Matt, but I disagree with you here. Although it depends on how
>far they go.
>
>For example, in an upscale neighborhood, parking a semi nearby is
>illegal. Why should lower income people have to put up with this
>****?

Far as I'm concerned, if you can fit a semi-truck on your property, it
should be perfectly legal to have it there whether you're rich or poor.