Steve wrote:
> It ****ES me off to see ignoramuses who don't know a
> snap-ring from a bellville spring continue to verbally
> smear crap on a piece of engineering over 10 years after
> the problems have been resolved to the point that the
> CURRENT product has an industry-leading (or near it)
> reliability rate.
How can it have an industry-leading reliability rate when Consumer
Reports' surveys show the following?
Ave. Chrysler Honda Toyota
1998....B.......D........B....=AD..B
1999....B.......F........D....=AD..B
2000....B.......F........B....=AD..B
2001....B.......B........C....=AD..A
2002....B.......C........C....=AD..A
2003....A.......B........A....=AD..A
2004....A.......A........A....=AD..A
If the problems had been solved ten years ago, how do you explain the
low reliability rates for the 1999-2000 Chrysler automatic
transmissions?
|