On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:14:45 -0700, PerfectReign
> wrote:

>On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:20:46 +0000, SnoMan took a five-minute break from
>flipping burgers to boot the etch-a-sketch and scribble out:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:38:51 -0700, SMS >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Yes, this is why Honda and Toyota are successfully building affordable
>>>cars in the U.S.. The styling may not be exciting, but they are
>>>reliable, fuel efficient, and relatively inexpensive. You can still get
>>>an entry-level Camry or Accord for around $16,000, and it will easily
>>>last 15 years with minimal maintenance.
>>
>>
>> THe main reason they have been successfull is QUALITY. THey are not
>> strapped with GM's labor costs and philosphy which will destroy Saturn
>> eventually. The only chance the Saturn has to servive is to split from
>> GM management on labor rules and vehicle philosphy because they are
>> abondoning the low end market they started in and focusing on higher
>> dollar and less fuel efficent model that tend to be more trouble prone
>> too.
>> -----------------
>> TheSnoMan.com
>
>
>I thought that was Saturn was designed for from the beginning.


THat was the original intent but it has been abandoned now.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com