"jeff" > wrote in message
news
iNDe.13026$N91.269@trnddc08...
> Nice strawman
not a strawman. i was making the point that you can find websites to
support most any view you care to take. that doesnt make it factual.
> And stupid ****s like you refuse to look beyond the cartoon version of
> their service manual _Refrigeration_for_Dummys_.
this coming from someone arguing a point about an industry he's totally
ignorant in because of what he read on google. ha! :-)
> I *am* saying that their branding was too good and for the majority of the
> population, including the examples I provided of more than a score of
> engineering firms, Freon is a generic term.
only to the _ignorant_ which is what ive stated from the beginning. using
the term is why i called you ignorant. defending its usage as industry
terminology in the face of someone within the industry telling you otherwise
is what makes you an ignorant ****.
> I simply demonstrated the fundamental error in your statement that the
> word Freon is NEVER used as a generic term for CFCs/a Class of
> Refrigerants/a chemical compound.
i didnt say it was never used. i said it was never used within the
industry. BOTTOM LINE, you stated "freon is a compound". dictionary.com
defines freon as a trademark.
> Ok then, I am still waiting to see these puddles of freon of yours!
concentration. i know that the wind will blow it around a mix it up, but
its not going to carry it all the way to the ozone layer. do you have any
idea how short the life of chlorine is in sunlight?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com