You think a '51 Chrysler Hemi's not old technology?
http://www.billhughes.com/pomonaDrags.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O


c wrote:
>
> Bill, I've come to the conclusion that you just don't get it. Let me break
> it down for you, and I will type REALLLLLLLL SLOOOOOWWWW so you can
> understand what I said. I will try to emphasize the important words so that
> you can see this clearly.
>
> "Now, I'm sure _"IF"_ someone built an unlimited jet car based on the
> newest jet technology, it _"MIGHT"_ be a different story"
>
> Neither one of us knows what a jet car WOULD be capable of using whatever
> the most powerful jet engine is out there. I don't know what it is, and I
> don't really care either. I was trying to make a point that the jets used in
> these cars are USUALLY some older technology. I mean, for **** sakes, I
> pasted a link in a previous post that showed a TF car .3 seconds quicker
> than a jet car, and then did the math to show that the TF car would be about
> 132 feet ahead of the jet car based on a speed of 300MPH (just for ease of
> calculation, but I will figure it out for whatever speed and ET difference
> you would like), and yet because you're in such a hurry to make it look like
> you know everything about everything, you argued with me, even though I was
> agreeing with you. Me thinks that you just like to argue, and personally I
> have better things to do with my time than argue with someone like you.
> Chris