linda wrote:

> ...and Ted is right that i am not real consistent with my beliefs

Well, yeah - that's kind of the inevitable result when someone decides
on what they want the answer to be without checking things out but then
seeks only info. that supports what they've already decided the answer
to be. It goes right along with your just coming down on air bags using
those chemicals without even finding out what led to their use in the
evolution of air bag technology - there could very well be valid reasons
for their use - benefits outweigh the problems until/unless something
better is figured out maybe.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---