View Single Post
  #22  
Old July 22nd 05, 01:36 AM
reggie white
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

you're all losers

Darus wrote:
> Well, Larry....no as a matter of fact, YOU did. If you take the time to
> look at the progression of the thread, it's plain for all to see that
> "Byron Forbes" and I traded numerous posts with some of the content
> relating to GTR and his "problems" with it.
>
> Example: "Byron Forbes Jul 15, 1:19 pm
>
> On my GTR box it is clearly marked - "Distributed by Electronic Arts".
> It's all the same arseholes......."
>
> You replied with:
>
> "Larry Jul 15, 4:48 pm
>
> I think it's forgotten that Each version of NRx, once patched, had NO
> SHOWSTOPPERS.
>
> You can't say that about any of the EA Games.
>
> -Larry"
>
> Now, I type out a reply to "Byron Forbes". (Bear in mind that in my
> hatred of all things Microsoft, I don't use OE to read usenet posts, I
> use Google Groups. It's a little slow, but since I only read R.A.S.,
> it's not a big deal). My reply:
>
> "Darus Jul 15, 5:26 pm
>
> I'm not sure where the hate mail for GTR came from, as this WAS a
> NSR/NR2003 thread, but I have no problem with GTR. What's
> yours?........"
>
> I then check for for new messages and see that your message about
> "SHOWSTOPPERS" and have no idea what you are talking about. I replied
> with my succinct post of "HUH?".
>
> As the thread moves along, I understand that you are referring to a
> "showstopper" as a <negative> aspect of either NSR or NRxxxx. I take
> that term to mean the opposite. Simple misunderstanding.
>
> Mssr. Forbes and I then traded 3 three more posts and then state that
> you never referred to GTR in your post. "I" never said that you did.
>
> Hopefully you can see that it was not I that erred by replying to the
> wrong post. Your post ended up in the middle of an exchange with Forbes
> and I and you ASSUMED that my reply "I'm not sure where the hate mail
> for GTR came from..." was intended for you. It was not.
>

Ads