aarcuda69062 wrote:
> In article >,
> Bill Putney > wrote:
>
>
>>Yes - I knew that - *BUT* for the purposes of preventing vapor lock in
>>the engine area, it does no good, don't you think? The recirc in the
>>tank consist of the pressure regulator (at the tank) dumping excess fuel
>>back to the tank from the pressure relief valve - not the same thing as
>>recirc'ing all the way from the fuel rail. With under hood temperatures
>>rising over the years, that's one of the reasons they had to abandon the
>>engine-mounted fuel pump and recirc the fuel. I guess the Chrysler
>>engineers forgot about that lesson learned.
>
>
> Less chance of vapor lock with the return less system since the
> fuel does not pick up engine heat (the whole point of the return
> less system).

What?


Matt