Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand
to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky....


"Wound Up" > wrote in message
...
> Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions
> based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe
> you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite,
> intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity.
>
> Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys,
> etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people"
> included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only.
>
> So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to
> make any sense now?
>
> Kevin DeAngelis wrote:
>> The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
>> newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He
>> (or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and
>> there have been no replies.
>>
>> I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than
>> Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still
>> do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they
>> could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the
>> days....
>>
>>
>> "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
>> n.umich.edu...
>>
>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>>>hate.
>>>>>
>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>>>of Mairca).
>>>>
>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>>>target of hatred
>>>
>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
>>
>>
>>
>