![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a
pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. So.... thats my 2 cents on the subject. YMMV. ![]() Roark --- wouldn't know a real winter if it bit him in the rumpus! Ventura, Ca. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ kathy :-) algae primer http://hometown.aol.com/ka30p/myhomepage/garden.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are a few areas that Roark is mistaken, though his dissertation is
reasonably close. One the point of maximum density of water is at 39 degrees, so as long as the temperature is warmer than 39, the warm water is at the top, and when the temperature of the pond drops below 39 degrees, the warmest water is at the bottom. The earth does continue to warm the bottom of the pond with the heat being transported to the surface where wind, evaporation, and cold temperatures rob the heat from the surface. When the amount of heat transferred is not sufficient to keep up, then the temperature at the surface reaches 32 degree water, and through continued cooling becomes 32 degree ice. At the water ice interface, the temperature is always 32 degrees. When ice forms, it expands about 9% which is why ice floats with about 10% of the cube out of the water. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/index.html "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. So.... thats my 2 cents on the subject. YMMV. ![]() Roark --- wouldn't know a real winter if it bit him in the rumpus! Ventura, Ca. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ kathy :-) algae primer http://hometown.aol.com/ka30p/myhomepage/garden.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to
keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? "George" wrote in message .. . "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick,
The bubbler will keep a hole in the ice for quite a while and is a whole lot cheaper to run than the electric stock tank heaters. It is true that the fish don't need much oxygen in their winter stupor, and cold water holds a lot of oxygen, so the bubbler is probably not necessary for oxygen, but it does help to drive off other gasses. If the pond does completely freeze over one night, the stock tank heater can be put in and then will melt a hole and maintain the hole open until warmer weather returns. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/index.html "Rick" wrote in message ink.net... I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? "George" wrote in message .. . "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rick" wrote in message ink.net... I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? If you have large fish, or a lot of them, then yes you need to add air to the water to keep it oxygenated. I do have a de-icer, and use it when the weather gets really bad, but haven't had to use it much since I built the pond, because we've only had two really cold days in the last two years. Here is a link to the de-icer that I have: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Scroll down the page and look at the first de-icer shown. That is the one that I have. "George" wrote in message .. . "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick,
I don't have that much problem with total ice cover and according the Farmer's Almanac this winter is suppose to be mild in my region, but there have been winters with total solid ice cover. Over the years I have checked trough de-icers and they usually run 1,000 to 1,500 watts and the thermostats that some of them have turn on between 38 degrees F. to 34 degrees F. depending on the brand. Needless to say, the cost of running one can be high, so I have used airstones. The airstone may not keep a hole in the ice but it will cause an escape for the air through the ice which is what needed. One of the years when the ponds froze over sold I came out and told myself, "what a waste," because there was no hole. Upon closer inspection I found that the air was making its way up through channels created as the ice froze. One of the important things that you have to remember when using an airstone is to have the airstone just below where the thickness of the ice will accumulate, you don't want to disturb the water layers at the bottom of the pond, so keep it high in upper level of your pond. I have switched over to an air blower so my airstones this year will only be about 6 inches below the surface of the water, which for me is more than enough. Good luck with what ever technique you decide to use. HTH Tom L.L. Rick wrote: I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? "George" wrote in message .. . "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom
How big of a bubbler do I get? Looked a Wally Word and the biggest one is for a 40 to 60 gal tank. my pond is give or take 1200 gal. "Tom L. La Bron" wrote in message ... Rick, I don't have that much problem with total ice cover and according the Farmer's Almanac this winter is suppose to be mild in my region, but there have been winters with total solid ice cover. Over the years I have checked trough de-icers and they usually run 1,000 to 1,500 watts and the thermostats that some of them have turn on between 38 degrees F. to 34 degrees F. depending on the brand. Needless to say, the cost of running one can be high, so I have used airstones. The airstone may not keep a hole in the ice but it will cause an escape for the air through the ice which is what needed. One of the years when the ponds froze over sold I came out and told myself, "what a waste," because there was no hole. Upon closer inspection I found that the air was making its way up through channels created as the ice froze. One of the important things that you have to remember when using an airstone is to have the airstone just below where the thickness of the ice will accumulate, you don't want to disturb the water layers at the bottom of the pond, so keep it high in upper level of your pond. I have switched over to an air blower so my airstones this year will only be about 6 inches below the surface of the water, which for me is more than enough. Good luck with what ever technique you decide to use. HTH Tom L.L. Rick wrote: I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? "George" wrote in message .. . "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick,
One year I did buy a Luft pump from drsfostersmith.com which is pretty powerful, but other air pumps I get I usually get from Wally-World, and I buy the $9.95 unit. I also use a T-connector and bring both of the outlets into one hose and add my airstone. Tom L.L. ------------------------------------------- Rick wrote: Tom How big of a bubbler do I get? Looked a Wally Word and the biggest one is for a 40 to 60 gal tank. my pond is give or take 1200 gal. "Tom L. La Bron" wrote in message ... Rick, I don't have that much problem with total ice cover and according the Farmer's Almanac this winter is suppose to be mild in my region, but there have been winters with total solid ice cover. Over the years I have checked trough de-icers and they usually run 1,000 to 1,500 watts and the thermostats that some of them have turn on between 38 degrees F. to 34 degrees F. depending on the brand. Needless to say, the cost of running one can be high, so I have used airstones. The airstone may not keep a hole in the ice but it will cause an escape for the air through the ice which is what needed. One of the years when the ponds froze over sold I came out and told myself, "what a waste," because there was no hole. Upon closer inspection I found that the air was making its way up through channels created as the ice froze. One of the important things that you have to remember when using an airstone is to have the airstone just below where the thickness of the ice will accumulate, you don't want to disturb the water layers at the bottom of the pond, so keep it high in upper level of your pond. I have switched over to an air blower so my airstones this year will only be about 6 inches below the surface of the water, which for me is more than enough. Good luck with what ever technique you decide to use. HTH Tom L.L. Rick wrote: I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? "George" wrote in message t... "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is not the size of the bubbler that is important. You are not trying to
achieve filtration by air driven under gravel filters, you are trying to keep the top surface of the water disturbed to prevent freezing over. Any of the pumps will work, just put a big airstone on the line, suspend the airstone a few inches from the top, and let it do the work of a heater. -- RichToyBox http://www.geocities.com/richtoybox/index.html "Rick" wrote in message ink.net... Tom How big of a bubbler do I get? Looked a Wally Word and the biggest one is for a 40 to 60 gal tank. my pond is give or take 1200 gal. "Tom L. La Bron" wrote in message ... Rick, I don't have that much problem with total ice cover and according the Farmer's Almanac this winter is suppose to be mild in my region, but there have been winters with total solid ice cover. Over the years I have checked trough de-icers and they usually run 1,000 to 1,500 watts and the thermostats that some of them have turn on between 38 degrees F. to 34 degrees F. depending on the brand. Needless to say, the cost of running one can be high, so I have used airstones. The airstone may not keep a hole in the ice but it will cause an escape for the air through the ice which is what needed. One of the years when the ponds froze over sold I came out and told myself, "what a waste," because there was no hole. Upon closer inspection I found that the air was making its way up through channels created as the ice froze. One of the important things that you have to remember when using an airstone is to have the airstone just below where the thickness of the ice will accumulate, you don't want to disturb the water layers at the bottom of the pond, so keep it high in upper level of your pond. I have switched over to an air blower so my airstones this year will only be about 6 inches below the surface of the water, which for me is more than enough. Good luck with what ever technique you decide to use. HTH Tom L.L. Rick wrote: I have bin told to just put one of those heaters that the farmers use to keep fresh water for there cattle from freezing in to my pond. They have a built in thermostat and only turn on when the water reaches 33 or 34 degrees. I have also bin told that you should not let the pond freeze over because of the gas build up and not the lake of oxygen. Are you saying that I sill should put in a Bubbler? "George" wrote in message .. . "Ka30P" wrote in message ... Roark did a bit on water and winter in response to a question and it makes a pretty interesting read. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ From: Roark7 Subject: Bubbling bottoms and super cooling Date: 1997/10/31 David Swarbrick wrote: Bubblers are recommended for maintaining an ice free portion of a pond over winter, and maintaining good oxygen levels. I have also seen it suggested here that it should not be placed on the bottom of the pond, but raised so that the circulation it induces does not disturb the water at the every bottom because this merely results in the very cold water by the ice being distributed all over. I question this. Yep... And I don't blame you one bit. I had the same doubts and voiced the same arguments that you shortly share because it *is* counter-intuitive... until you start looking hard. Actually, if your pond is deep, like mine (45 inches or more), the circulation, which goes from bottom to top, will draw the residual warmth in the ground below the frost line to the upper levels of the pond, and moderate the water temperature. I ran a bubbler from the bottom all winter last year and only had ice two days (less than 1/8 inch thick, at that, and only on one end). First, warm water rises, and cold water sinks. The water at the bottom will always circulate if there is a temperature difference. Frozen water floats. I suppose there must be a point just before water freezes where the situation turns on its head, but I assume also that this is only at the point very near freezing. I had major questions about the physics aspect of this whole "winter pond" thingy as well. I did some asking and a bit of research and came up with three things which cause the inverse stratification effect. These are, in ascending order of importance: - The native heat of the earth - The physics of water going from a liquid to a solid - Surface cooling due to winds and cold air. I'll rattle through each contributing effect in detail below: - Heat of the Earth: It turns out that the earthern bottom of a 4-foot deep pond stays right around 34-38 degrees even though the outside air temperature drops much lower. The simple reason for this is the Earth is slightly exothermic. As you dig down you hit a point where more heat is being released by the earth than can be pulled-away by wind, night sky, etc. This is why you bury water pipes below the "frost line". This heating effect is small in ponds, but it *is* there. The earth *is* pumping a bit of heat energy into it all the time. The other effects (below) tend to magnify this effect into something useful by keeping this slightly warmer water on the bottom. I will add here that the residual heat of the earth is called the geothermal gradient, and varies from place to place, and increases with depth. But at shallow depth, it is affected by surface temperatureand wind chill. For instance, at the latitude where I live (38 degrees), the air in a cave stays in the vicinity of 54 degrees F, depending on air currents within the cave, which depend on the connectivity of cave passages, and the number of surface entrances, all of which can affect the transfer the heat to the surface,and visa versa. Travel north of this latitude, and the temperature is lower. Travel south of this latitude and the temperature is higher. With regard to ponds, the surface temperature has an effect on the soil, but only to within a certain depth. That depth is called the frost line. Below that depth, the soil will not freeze, but will retain it's residual warmth, and increase with increasing depth. The frost line varies with latitude. At my latitude, the frost line is at 22 inches. In order to keep buried utilities from freezing (such as water lines), the local building codes required the utilities to be buried six inches below the frost line, at 28 inches. If you live at 38 Degrees north latitude, and your pond is 45 inches deep, then the bottom 17 inches will not freeze (unless, of course, you have an abnormally cold winter, in which case, your pond can actually freeze solid, but this is rare in most cases). Lat year my pond only had a small surface crust for two days, and then stayed ice free the rest of the winter. - Physics of Water: It turns out that water doesn't move upwards because it is "warm" nor sink when it becomes "cold". A little thought reveals this behavior is strictly a function of density. Warmer water *tends* to be less dense so it rises... but this isn't gospel. An interesting kink in the water density -vs- temperature curve shows-up just prior to 32 degrees F. At the pre-freezing point (32.8 F), water undergoes a major density change. As it cools it becomes *less* dense than water which is just a fraction of a degree warmer. This difference is fairly large. Being lighter than the surrounding water, near-freezing water *rises*. (This is one reason frozen pipes tend to burst. The density of the water decreases, the mass stays the same, so the result is volumetric expansion which splits pipes with ease.) The degree of final bouyancy is controlled to a large part by the dissolved oxygen content of the water. The more dissolved O2, the greater the expansion once the freezing point has been reached. Since water at the *top* of the pond tends to have a greater O2 concentration, this further contributes to stratification. Near-freezing water moves toward the surface, and then, having reached the surface, freezes completely. Unless, of course, you draw warmer water up from below, which is why I place the air stone at the bottom in the winter. Some have suggested that drawing the warmer water from the bottom to the top will cause the temperature of the water at the bottom to drop. But that doesn't happen if the pond is below the frost line because the surrounding soil will release it's residual heat into the water as the warmer water is drawn towards the surface. Of course, if your air supply is outside, and the temperature gets very cold, pumping that cold air into the water could affect the water temperature. The overall temperture of the pond may drop slightly, but usually not enough to adversely affect the fish unless the air temperatuere stays below freezing for a long period of time (in which case, you might consider keeping your air pump indoors and running the hose out to the pond. I know a guy who has installed a buried air hose to his pond from his basement, where his air pump is located. So in the winter, he is actually pumping heated air into the pond). - Surface Cooling Effects This one is pretty obvious, but its worth restating to put it in context. Given a sub-freezing day and a brisk wind, its a simple matter to pull more heat from the top layer of water than can be replaced by natural convection. Once the top starts to freeze, heat loss to ambient and basic water physics insures the top will *stay* cooler than the bottom. If this wasn't true, you'd never see a thin coat of ice.... the pond would instead just hit a point where the entire thing suddenly became a solid chunk of ice. It seems to me that if the air being pumped in is warmer anyway (in my case, from inside an unheated shed), then the balance will be about right. Your idea about pumping warm air into the water isn't a bad one, but it will take a lot of warm air to make a dent in the ponds temperature.... far more than you could reasonably produce. That is true. However, as I stated above, pumping cold air into the water can adversely affect the water temperature. So, the warm air won't heat the water, but will simply prevent it from making the water colder than cold air will. Pumping a large amount of air in would also create currents which the fish would need to fight or at least adjust for. Hibernating fish are in no position to do this and forcing them into this situation uses energy they will need during the rest of the winter. For keeping a hole in the ice however, you could likely use this warm-air idea to your benefit. Put an airstone a foot under the water and run warm air to it. Bear in mind that you will lose lots of heat in just a short run between your shed and the airstone. An alternative would be to purchase an electric deicer for about $50-$60: http://www.pondsolutions.com/pond-heaters.htm Also if the problem with water under ice is the lack of oxygen and build up of waste products under the ice, then the more chance the bubbler has to oxygenate the water and take away the foul water the better. Whether you use a de-icer or not, it is always a good idea to add air to the pond in the winter time for the reasons you state above. The oxygen demands of fish near the freezing point are very, very low. This is a good thing because I've got a feeling there isn't much oxygen available once you near the peak of winter. Fortunately, decay and decomposition of wastes by bacteria has nearly stopped as well which relieves a decent portion of the oxygen load. Very little oxygen is needed in a winter pond. Unless it freezes over, in which case, there is no oxygen exchange, and the fish could die. During a really *cold* winter, I think the idea of a full-blown bubble system would tend to upset a natural balance which Nature clearly went out of her way to establish. Having said that however, I can see a very definite *benefit* to using such a system as the air temp starts to push into the upper 30's and 40's. By introducing additional air and inducing water motion, you'd be putting lots of needed oxygen into the water as well as helping the pond to absorb ambient heat. Fish coming out of their winter sleep wouldn't be oxygen-stressed as well as being thin, worn and badly in need in of a shower. ![]() during the actual *wintering*... its the *transition* from hibernation to normal metabolism which gets them. Your bubbler could be a great tool during that transition period. It is also important to transition your fish to food that is easier to digest when preparing the pond for winter as the microbes in their gut that helps in digestion will eventually go dormant. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Distilled/RO water? | Nitesbane | General | 13 | July 4th 04 10:35 PM |
stuck in the cycle | Chris Palma | General | 4 | February 20th 04 07:03 AM |
RO recycle of waste water | Mark Breithaupt | Reefs | 14 | February 5th 04 04:19 AM |
No Better RO/DI Anywhere!!! | Pat Hogan | General | 0 | November 14th 03 05:57 PM |
Bleach in a fountain? | Rob | General | 16 | July 14th 03 03:28 AM |