![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My ammonia and nitrites test out at zero, so my bio-wheel biological filter
seems to be working well. I'd like to figure out how often to perform partial water replacements based on the nitrate levels. At what level of nitrate should I do a water change, and what level should I try to bring the nitrate down to? Thanks, Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David J. Braunegg" wrote in message ... My ammonia and nitrites test out at zero, so my bio-wheel biological filter seems to be working well. I'd like to figure out how often to perform partial water replacements based on the nitrate levels. At what level of nitrate should I do a water change, and what level should I try to bring the nitrate down to? Thanks, Dave It depends on size of tank and fish. A samll tank under 20 and large tanks with messy fish may be 30/40. The lower the better. Some fish like angels need regular water changes, 2 or 3 a week as they thrive in claen water rather than the nitrate level. I do 2 x 10/15% a week on all my tanks, as it prevents problems rather than spotting them later. In my 65g with 2 angels and 5 clown loaches they just deserve the best I can offer them, and they are all thriving and growing. Some LFS say 10% a week or 20% a fortnight, that that is a minimum/general rule and it's up to you to decide based on your fish. Mary. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary,
Thank you for the response. I can see that that the desirable nitrate level might vary by the type of fish, but the size of tank shouldn't matter. Nitrate level is nitrate level no matter how big or small the tank is. I have Platys and Corys. I've had several unexplained fish deaths and am trying to figure out what is going on. I've seen no visible signs of disease, so I am looking into water quality. I have a 10-gallon tank and, due to a busy schedule, I shifted from a 3-gallon water change (with gravel vacuum) every week to a 3-gallon water change every two weeks. I want some way of determining if I need to go back to the weekly changes. I am also starting to wonder if I've been overfeeding the fish. I am thinking that a high nitrate level would also be an indicator of that. Hence my original posting. Dave "Mary Burns" wrote in message ... "David J. Braunegg" wrote in message ... My ammonia and nitrites test out at zero, so my bio-wheel biological filter seems to be working well. I'd like to figure out how often to perform partial water replacements based on the nitrate levels. At what level of nitrate should I do a water change, and what level should I try to bring the nitrate down to? Thanks, Dave It depends on size of tank and fish. A samll tank under 20 and large tanks with messy fish may be 30/40. The lower the better. Some fish like angels need regular water changes, 2 or 3 a week as they thrive in claen water rather than the nitrate level. I do 2 x 10/15% a week on all my tanks, as it prevents problems rather than spotting them later. In my 65g with 2 angels and 5 clown loaches they just deserve the best I can offer them, and they are all thriving and growing. Some LFS say 10% a week or 20% a fortnight, that that is a minimum/general rule and it's up to you to decide based on your fish. Mary. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() David J. Braunegg wrote: Nitrate level is nitrate level no matter how big or small the tank is. While this is technically correct I think what Mary was refering to is that there is more room for error in a large tank. A high nitrate level in a large tank isn't as serious because the increased water volume is a bit more forgiving. I have a 10-gallon tank and, due to a busy schedule, I shifted from a 3-gallon water change (with gravel vacuum) every week to a 3-gallon water change every two weeks. I want some way of determining if I need to go back to the weekly changes. Unless your tank is very heavily stocked your current water changing schedule should be sufficient for the fish you have. Have you tested the water yet? If so posting some test results might be helpful. I am also starting to wonder if I've been overfeeding the fish. I am thinking that a high nitrate level would also be an indicator of that. Hence my original posting. A high nitrate level is not necessarily an indicator of overfeeding. A high rate of increase in nitrates would be though. If you want to use nitrates to determine if you are overfeeding or not then you are going to need to test the water several times between water changes to see how fast the nitrates are going up rather than just finding out how high they are now. Also check your tap water - while you might think it should test 0ppm for nitrates in many cases it does not. -Daniel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , djb@reverse-the-
er.miter.org says... I have Platys and Corys. I've had several unexplained fish deaths and am trying to figure out what is going on. Some corys (Panda for example) expire for little or no reason, never happened to me but have seen reports. -- Jim Anderson ( 8(|) To email me just pull my_finger |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-04-05, dfreas wrote:
While this is technically correct I think what Mary was refering to is that there is more room for error in a large tank. A high nitrate level in a large tank isn't as serious because the increased water volume is a bit more forgiving. I'm not sure it is... It's harder to change a larger mass, but when you test, you're testing the average, not a one time spike. That is, overfeeding similarly stocked 20G and 55G tanks won't change the water parameters in the 55G as much as the 20G. But, since the units of measurement is ppm or g/mL, then the volume has been normalized. It's that many ppm regardless of the size of the tank. To answer the original question, the nitrate levels depend on what you are keeping. Some fish can stand higher levels, others can't. Plant tanks need higher levels to feed the plants. If you don't have plants, ideally, you probably want nitrates to be as low as possible, 10ppm or less, maybe? My favorite trick is to use terrestrial plants to suck out the nitrates in a tank. Devil's ivy is particularly good for this. Let the leaves hang outside of the tank, and immerse the root and root stubs in the water. Something else to try is to find some aquatic plants that are nitrates sponges like anacharis, duckweed, indian fern, etc. -- "I have to decide between two equally frightening options. If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David J. Braunegg" wrote in message ... My ammonia and nitrites test out at zero, so my bio-wheel biological filter seems to be working well. I'd like to figure out how often to perform partial water replacements based on the nitrate levels. At what level of nitrate should I do a water change, and what level should I try to bring the nitrate down to? Thanks, Dave Platies are good eaters, pecking plants during the day, eating the micro (something) that feed on algae on plants. They do produce a lot of poo. In my 10g, I am raising 10 male redwags platy fry for LFS. All are now 1", and will have to be 1.25" before they are ready. It is fully stocked, but I hoover gravel 25% a week and change 10% a day. Nitrate is 12.5% and tap water is 15%. Plants bring it down very well. In my 25g, I have 30+ platy fry, all about 1/2" . As platies eat everything from the top, middle, bottom you have to increase the water changes. It is hard to get food past platies for your cories as they will eat it first, before the cories come out. My platies love tossing an algae wafer around, meant for someone else, etc. Even so, platies are very hardy with nitrate levels, but your cories are not.I have over 60 platies and 10 cories in various tanks at moment so I do understand them a little. Mary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() js1 wrote: I'm not sure it is... It's harder to change a larger mass, but when you test, you're testing the average, not a one time spike. That is, overfeeding similarly stocked 20G and 55G tanks won't change the water parameters in the 55G as much as the 20G. But, since the units of measurement is ppm or g/mL, then the volume has been normalized. It's that many ppm regardless of the size of the tank. It isn't the nitrate levels directly that kill fish - nitrate levels only stress them except at extreme levels (beyond the range of store bought kits) where they can sometimes be lethal. In common practice it is never the nitrates that kill a fish, the nitrates only stress them and weaken them so they are more prone to disease. In a ten gallon tank this is more dangerous than in a 100 gallon tank because the fish are in closer quarters and disease will spread faster and more completely giving a higher chance of killing the fish. So yes, high nitrate levels are more dangerous in a small tank than in a large one. Normalization of the volume has nothing to do with it. pH fluctuations would also be more dangerous in a small tank - as would wide temperature variations. Both of these are normalized parameters. Neither of them however will kill fish directly except in extreme circumstances, it is the stress they cause that weakens fish to attacks from other dangers. Stress of any kind is in general a bigger risk in a smaller tank. Plant tanks need higher levels to feed the plants. This isn't true. If the nitrate levels aren't zero then the plants have plenty of nitrates. My tanks never get above 10ppm and they are heavily planted - in fact I have successfully kept planted tanks with less than 5ppm (lower than the detectable range of the test kit) nitrates with no problems whatsoever. The amount of nitrates that plants require is very low and if nitrates aren't zero then the plants aren't using all of the available nitrates and thus aren't starving. -Daniel |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , js1
wrote: On 2005-04-05, dfreas wrote: While this is technically correct I think what Mary was refering to is that there is more room for error in a large tank. A high nitrate level in a large tank isn't as serious because the increased water volume is a bit more forgiving. I'm not sure it is... It's harder to change a larger mass, but when you test, you're testing the average, not a one time spike. That is, overfeeding similarly stocked 20G and 55G tanks won't change the water parameters in the 55G as much as the 20G. But, since the units of measurement is ppm or g/mL, then the volume has been normalized. It's that many ppm regardless of the size of the tank. Agreed, although a ppm is a mg/L ... if you had g/mL levels of nitrate in your tank, the water would be pretty sludgy!! (Saturated NaCl is about 0.35 g/mL) The flip side is that the volume of water needed to reduce nitrate levels through water changes is slightly more than double for a 55g versus a 20g tank - much more work unless you have everything plumbed right in. I have a 130g tank here, and a 10-20% water change is a BIG job! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David C. Stone" wrote: The flip side is that the volume of water needed to reduce nitrate levels through water changes is slightly more than double for a 55g versus a 20g tank - much more work unless you have everything plumbed right in. I have a 130g tank here, and a 10-20% water change is a BIG job! Get a python water remover/replacer - its a doddle! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|