![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it possible to have to much bio-load? I currently have a 55 gal
setup using 2 ehiems (2015) 1 is complety full of media and the 2nd half full of media and mesh filter. I'm also using a Bac-Pack II skimmer which also uses some mesh in the resivor? The best part is my test results for ammonia 0% Nitrate 0% Nitrite 0%. I have had 0% nitrate for going on almost 3 weeks now. Thats a good thing. What I want to do now is put maybe 15-20 lbs live rock, would this be over kill on the bio-load? I would think is all a good thing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The bio media is designed to hold becteria for nitrogen cycling (well, not
complete but from ammonia-nitrite-nitrate). Bacteria housed in live rock is designed to do the same thing. Some will claim the bio-media will end acting as a nitrate factory. This kind of confuses me because that is what they are designed to do (convert ammonia to nitrate) and when they are releasing nitrate into the water they blame the bio-media (?) If you want to look at completing the nitrogen cycle (nitrate-nitrogen/oxygen), you would be looking at adding a deep sand bed (DSB). I have recently learned this topic is up for debate as well. I don't believe the debate is about whether or not the DSB will complete the nitrogen cycle, but more about things like how deep it should be, whether it should be fine sand or coarse aragonite and things of that nature. Anyway, IMO I don't think you can have too much bio-media, just as you can't have too much live rock (I myself use the berlin method of just LR and protien skimming). The becteria will only churn out as much nitrates as it has fuel (or ammonia or nitrites) to produce it from. If you have too little bio-media and you add a bunch of fish or other ammonia producing critters and your bio-media can't keep up, then that would be bad, exposing your tank inhabitants to high levels of ammonia and most likley killing them. Of course this is from all the research I had done back in the late 90's and I haven't looked into any new practices since then. I have just been applying what I have learned and it seems to work for me. I am curious to see what the view points of today are. Greg "Rick" wrote in message om... Is it possible to have to much bio-load? I currently have a 55 gal setup using 2 ehiems (2015) 1 is complety full of media and the 2nd half full of media and mesh filter. I'm also using a Bac-Pack II skimmer which also uses some mesh in the resivor? The best part is my test results for ammonia 0% Nitrate 0% Nitrite 0%. I have had 0% nitrate for going on almost 3 weeks now. Thats a good thing. What I want to do now is put maybe 15-20 lbs live rock, would this be over kill on the bio-load? I would think is all a good thing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rick" wrote in message om... Is it possible to have to much bio-load? I currently have a 55 gal setup using 2 ehiems (2015) 1 is complety full of media and the 2nd half full of media and mesh filter. I'm also using a Bac-Pack II skimmer which also uses some mesh in the resivor? The best part is my test results for ammonia 0% Nitrate 0% Nitrite 0%. I have had 0% nitrate for going on almost 3 weeks now. Thats a good thing. What I want to do now is put maybe 15-20 lbs live rock, would this be over kill on the bio-load? I would think is all a good thing. No nitrate, humm... Very interesting. When you say "Bios-Load", do you mean fish / inhibitant or as in filtering? If you refer to fish or addition inhabitant to your existing community, then you will check if your filtering can or able to remove waste or nutrient from your new addition. If it still reading near 0%, then it is ok. Add slowly and monitor the water chemistry / parameter. Adding more LR to your already stable tank, you will need to check if the LR does not have any die-off. Putting in a holding tank or a QT and measure the chemistry for any bad reading. CapFusion,... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No nitrate, humm... Very interesting. When you say "Bios-Load", do you mean
fish / inhibitant or as in filtering? I was refering to filtering, my tank has gone thru the complete nitrate cycle. I have 2 ehiems because I somtimes overload with to many fish so by having an additional canister this will keep everything better balanced. I have not lost 1 fish. I first put in 3 damels and a few hermits along with some nitromax start the cycle after 40-50 days the nitrites had peeked and the nitrates was on the rise. Once the nitrates peeked(50-100ppm) I checked daily after I saw that the nitrates begain to drop I then did a 50% water change, after 3-4 days from the water change my nitrates drop to 0ppm. Currently I have 1 huma huma-1 yellow tang-1puffer- 1 maroon clown 3damels and want to add a blue tang- Just how many fish can a 55 gal hold with the bio-load I have? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was refering to filtering, my tank has gone thru the complete
nitrate cycle. I have 2 ehiems because I somtimes overload with to many fish so by having an additional canister this will keep everything better balanced. its important to note that bio-load is the measure of waste produced by life in your tank alone it has nothing to do with the filters, your filters dont have a bio-load instead they handle a bio-load. Currently I have 1 huma huma-1 yellow tang-1puffer- 1 maroon clown 3damels and want to add a blue tang- Just how many fish can a 55 gal hold with the bio-load I have? assuming now that you know whats what, the question should be "how much bio-load will my filters handle?", and the problem is you wont overload the filters, but you will overload the tank, congradulations you have already done that. neigher of the tangs alone *shouldnt* go in a 55( i wont argue it much but the yellow *could* be ok in a 55, its been done before ) you dont say which puffer, but there is a good *almost certain* chance that itll grow to at least 12" requiring a 100gal + tank the maroon clowns and damsels are fine as long as you can keep teritorial issues down (good luck) and the huma huma gets to like 10" and requires about 100gals also -- Richard Reynolds |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and the problem is you wont overload the filters, but you will overload
the tank, I couldnt agree more.. The way we set uptanks now days, (good skimmers good LR and DSB) we will have stress problems due to the amount of fish, way before any biol;ogical filtration problems Rod Buehler www.asplashoflife.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You Wrote:
its important to note that bio-load is the measure of waste produced by life in your tank alone it has nothing to do with the filters, your filters dont have a bio-load instead they handle a bio-load. Thats well knowin and understood, THKS assuming now that you know whats what, the question should be "how much bio-load will my filters handle?", and the problem is you wont overload the filters, but you will overload the tank, congradulations you have already done that. I dont think so, I think I can even follow the add 1 more rule. LOL isnt it always just add 1 more? No i'm not going to fall for that one. F.Y.I with the current load on my tank, I have never had a rise with nitrates and do reg monthly water changes even though the nitrares are not even measurable doing a water changes is just like doing oil changes on my cars. DO IT REGULAR Actually I dont get nitrate or ammonia readings and I have tested on several different test kits. Thats what I find so amazing is that with all the fish I have why dont I get these readings? WHY? because of the Dual Ehiems Plus the Bac-Pak II skimmer. This setup turned out to be better then what a wet/dry system would do for this size tank. Dont get me wrong a sump is the way to go but on larger tanks. Each of these ehiems are rated for 60+ gal tanks so one is all I ever needed. I bet if I took one off the ehiems for a month and tested the water on the day my next water change is due, I would get a measurable nitrate reading, but why ruin a good thing. The old rule "if it's not broken dont fix it". Yes I agree that these fish need a larger tank and I will go to a larger tank before they out grow this one. My goal at the begining of setting this one up was to 1.Educate my kids (6 & 11 Years old) Great hobbie for them 2.To get my wife hooked on the hobbie. 3.Try the hobbie again for myself and make sure I like it just as I always have before. I did not want to jump into spending the big bucks on what I really want right away. Now that the family is hooked they can see its justifiable to set up the mothership tank. (my plan worked) At the beginning my wife did not understand why I would spend $1000's on a big fish tank. I had to sell her first, Now she is hooked more then me and has made several trips to lFS trying to keep pushing me to buy the larger tank right away. As I'm not in a rush to get one but, as time goes on all the current fish will be move into a larger 120 gal 48x24x24 FO tank and the 55 gal will be coverted into the reef tank. Rick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seem like your tank are doing good the way you are, especially no nitrate
reading. If you are planning to get a bigger tank for those tang, puffer and other, then you are in the right path. Just making a note - Nitrate can be consume or absorb by algae, not just anoxic bacteria. Maybe that the reason why you do not detect by your test kit. From any filter [canister / W/D / HOT] will create nitrate as a finish product from those bacteria living on those media. So there no way nitrate will be low or non-detectable if nothing else other than DSB / Algae to consume it. Doing schedule water change simple just diluting but should still have nitrate present. CapFusion,... "Rick" wrote in message om... I think I can even follow the add 1 more rule. LOL isnt it always just add 1 more? No i'm not going to fall for that one. F.Y.I with the current load on my tank, I have never had a rise with nitrates and do reg monthly water changes even though the nitrares are not even measurable doing a water changes is just like doing oil changes on my cars. DO IT REGULAR Actually I dont get nitrate or ammonia readings and I have tested on several different test kits. Thats what I find so amazing is that with all the fish I have why dont I get these readings? WHY? because of the Dual Ehiems Plus the Bac-Pak II skimmer. This setup turned out to be better then what a wet/dry system would do for this size tank. Dont get me wrong a sump is the way to go but on larger tanks. Each of these ehiems are rated for 60+ gal tanks so one is all I ever needed. I bet if I took one off the ehiems for a month and tested the water on the day my next water change is due, I would get a measurable nitrate reading, but why ruin a good thing. The old rule "if it's not broken dont fix it". Yes I agree that these fish need a larger tank and I will go to a larger tank before they out grow this one. My goal at the begining of setting this one up was to 1.Educate my kids (6 & 11 Years old) Great hobbie for them 2.To get my wife hooked on the hobbie. 3.Try the hobbie again for myself and make sure I like it just as I always have before. I did not want to jump into spending the big bucks on what I really want right away. Now that the family is hooked they can see its justifiable to set up the mothership tank. (my plan worked) At the beginning my wife did not understand why I would spend $1000's on a big fish tank. I had to sell her first, Now she is hooked more then me and has made several trips to lFS trying to keep pushing me to buy the larger tank right away. As I'm not in a rush to get one but, as time goes on all the current fish will be move into a larger 120 gal 48x24x24 FO tank and the 55 gal will be coverted into the reef tank. Rick |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't forget that the amount of waste produced your fish and invertebrates is
not the only factor in determining how many fish one can have in the aquarium. Other factors to consider are the eventual size of the fish, their behavior (are they territorial?), and how active the fish are. I do know that damsels (with the exception of chromis) are very territoral as are maroon clowns. They may not be very large fish but take up alot of room because they are so territorial (aggressive). The puffer and trigger will get pretty large and the yellow tang is very active. I don't think a blue tang would be advisable until you get a bigger tank ( at least 85 to 90 gallons). reefman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Throttle a pump harmful? | Ross Bagley | Reefs | 38 | March 11th 04 05:11 PM |
Electricity measurments - toying around with a meter... ;-) | Pszemol | Reefs | 11 | February 6th 04 07:30 PM |